-
The scintillator detector is one of the most important detectors in the field of radiation detection and radiation physics. The characteristics and performance of scintillator that is a core part of the measurement system, are widely studied. Especially, the nonlinearity of scintillators under high excitation density has received more attention because of its direct influence on the measurement results. In this paper, physical modeling and experimental research on this problem are carried out in-depth. First, the second-order quenching effect of excitons on the scintillator luminescence process is quantitatively analyzed based on the carrier dynamic equation. The luminescence attenuation curves of scintillator under different initial carrier concentrations generated by different excitation densities are obtained. The relationship of the light yield and the efficiency of scintillator with the initial carrier concentration is analyzed, and the results show that with the increase of the initial carrier concentration, the light yield tends to be saturated and the light efficiency decreases. Then CeF3 scintillator is studied in the Z-scan photoluminescence experiment. The relationship between the light yield and the excitation density is obtained, and the experimental data can be fitted by the carrier quenching model well, which verifies the physical model. At the same time, the energy density threshold corresponding to the 10% nonlinearity of CeF3 scintillator is obtained.The physical model established in this paper can be used to predict and explain the nonlinear luminescence of various scintillation materials according to different parameters of crystal materials, which is important to understand and solve the nonlinearity problem of scintillators under high excitation density in practical application of radiation detection. -
Keywords:
- scintillator nonlinearity /
- carrier quenching /
- photoluminescence
[1] Moses W W, BizarriG A, WilliamsR T, Payne S A, Vasil'ev A N, Singh J, Li Q, Grim J Q, Choong W S 2012 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 59 2038
Google Scholar
[2] Khodyuk I V, Dorenbos P 2012 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 59 3320
Google Scholar
[3] Moses W W, PayneS A, ChoongW S, Hull G, Reutter B W 2008 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 55 1049
Google Scholar
[4] Siengsanoh K, LimkitjaroenpornP, Sustini E, Kaewkhao J 2018 Mater. Today Proc. 5 15024
Google Scholar
[5] Limkitjaroenporn P, Hongtong W, Chaiphaksa W, Kang S J, Kaewkhao J, Siengsanoh K 2018 Mater. Today Proc. 5 15110
Google Scholar
[6] Klamra W, Balcerzyk M, Czarnacki W, Kozlov V, Mosynski M, Syntfeld-Kazuch A, Szczesniak T 2009 J. Instrum. 4 05006
Google Scholar
[7] Swiderski L, Marcinkowski R, Szawłowski M, Mosynski M, CzarnackiW, Syntfeld-Kazuch A, Szczesniak T, Pausch G, Plettner C, Roemer K 2012 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 59 222
Google Scholar
[8] Chen X, Han H T, Li G 2017 Radiat. Meas. 97 42
Google Scholar
[9] 管兴胤, 张子川, 张文钰 2009 原子能科学与技术 43 942
Google Scholar
Guan X Y, Zhang Z C, Zhang W Y 2009 Atomic Energy Sci. Tech 43 942
Google Scholar
[10] 宋朝晖, 李刚, 王奎禄, 胡华四, 代秋声 2004 核电子学与探测技术 24 461
Google Scholar
Song Z H, Li G, Wang K L, Hu H S, Dai Q S 2004 Nuclear Electron. Detection Tech. 24 461
Google Scholar
[11] Spassky D, Vasil'ev A, Belsky A, Fedorov N, Martin P, Markov S, Buzanov O, Kozlova N, Shlegel V 2019 Opt. Mater. 90 7
Google Scholar
[12] Grim J Q, Ucer K B, Burger A, BhattacharyaP, Tupitsyn E, Rowe E, Buliga V M, Trefilova L, Gektin A, Bizarri G A, Moses W W, Williams R T 2013 Phys. Rev. B 87 125117
Google Scholar
[13] Williams R T, GrimJ Q, Li Q, Ucer K B, Bizarri G A, Kerisit S, Gao F, Bhattacharya P, Tupitsyn E, Rowe E, Buliga V M, Burger A 2013 Proc. SPIE 8852 88520J
Google Scholar
[14] 鲍杰, 陈永浩, 张显鹏, 等 2019 68 080101
Google Scholar
Bao J, Chen Y H, Zhang X P, et al. 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 080101
Google Scholar
[15] 任杰, 阮锡超, 陈永浩, 等 2020 69 172901
Google Scholar
Ren J, Ruan X C, Chen Y H, et al. 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 172901
Google Scholar
[16] Krzywinski J, Andrejczuk A, Bionta R M, Burian T, Chalupsky J, Jurek M, Krim M, Nagirnyi V, Sobierajski R, Tiedtke K, Vielhauer S, Juha L 2017 Opt. Mater. Express 7 665
Google Scholar
[17] Vielhauer S, Babina V, De Graziab M, Feldach E, Kirm M, Nagirnyi V, Vasil'ev A 2009 Proc. SPIE 7361 73610R
Google Scholar
[18] Vielhauer S, Babin V, De Grazia M, Feldbach E, Kirm M, Nagirnyi V, Vasil'ev A 2008 Phys. Solid State 50 1789
Google Scholar
[19] Kirm M, Andrejczuk A, Krzywinski J, Sobierajski R 2005 Phys. Stat. Sol.(c) 2 649
Google Scholar
[20] Förster T H 1948 Ann. Phys. 55 437
[21] Clegg R M, Herman B 1995 Methods Enzymol. 6 1
Google Scholar
[22] Wu P G, Brand L 1994 Anal. Biochem. 218 1
Google Scholar
[23] Belsky A N, Kamenskikh I A, Mikhailin V V, Pedrini C, Vasil'ev A N 1998 Radiat. Eff. Defect. S. 150 1
Google Scholar
[24] 施朝淑, 陈永虎, 张国斌, 许小亮, 汤洪高 2002 发光学报 23 217
Google Scholar
Shi C S, Chen Y H, Zhang G B, Xu X L, Tang H G 2002 Chin. J. Lumin. 23 217
Google Scholar
[25] Nagirnyi V, Dolgov S, Grigonis R, Kirm M, Nagornaya L L, Savikhin F, Sirutkaitis V, Vielhauer S, A. Vasil'ev A 2010 IEEE Trans Nucl. Sci. 57 1182
Google Scholar
-
图 1 不同初始载流子浓度下的归一化荧光衰减曲线
Figure 1. Normalized luminescence attenuation curves at different initial carrier concentrations.
图 2 光产额与初始载流子浓度的关系
Figure 2. Relationship between luminescence yield and initial carrier concentration.
图 3 光效率与初始载流子浓度的关系
Figure 3. Relationship between luminescence efficiency and initial carrier concentration.
图 4 Z扫描实验设置示意图
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of Z scan experiment settings
图 5 CeF3晶体不同Z处的荧光波形曲线
Figure 5. Luminescence waveform curves at different Z of CeF3 crystal.
图 6 CeF3的Z扫描实验数据及拟合曲线
Figure 6. Z-scan experimental data and fitting curve of CeF3.
-
[1] Moses W W, BizarriG A, WilliamsR T, Payne S A, Vasil'ev A N, Singh J, Li Q, Grim J Q, Choong W S 2012 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 59 2038
Google Scholar
[2] Khodyuk I V, Dorenbos P 2012 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 59 3320
Google Scholar
[3] Moses W W, PayneS A, ChoongW S, Hull G, Reutter B W 2008 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 55 1049
Google Scholar
[4] Siengsanoh K, LimkitjaroenpornP, Sustini E, Kaewkhao J 2018 Mater. Today Proc. 5 15024
Google Scholar
[5] Limkitjaroenporn P, Hongtong W, Chaiphaksa W, Kang S J, Kaewkhao J, Siengsanoh K 2018 Mater. Today Proc. 5 15110
Google Scholar
[6] Klamra W, Balcerzyk M, Czarnacki W, Kozlov V, Mosynski M, Syntfeld-Kazuch A, Szczesniak T 2009 J. Instrum. 4 05006
Google Scholar
[7] Swiderski L, Marcinkowski R, Szawłowski M, Mosynski M, CzarnackiW, Syntfeld-Kazuch A, Szczesniak T, Pausch G, Plettner C, Roemer K 2012 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 59 222
Google Scholar
[8] Chen X, Han H T, Li G 2017 Radiat. Meas. 97 42
Google Scholar
[9] 管兴胤, 张子川, 张文钰 2009 原子能科学与技术 43 942
Google Scholar
Guan X Y, Zhang Z C, Zhang W Y 2009 Atomic Energy Sci. Tech 43 942
Google Scholar
[10] 宋朝晖, 李刚, 王奎禄, 胡华四, 代秋声 2004 核电子学与探测技术 24 461
Google Scholar
Song Z H, Li G, Wang K L, Hu H S, Dai Q S 2004 Nuclear Electron. Detection Tech. 24 461
Google Scholar
[11] Spassky D, Vasil'ev A, Belsky A, Fedorov N, Martin P, Markov S, Buzanov O, Kozlova N, Shlegel V 2019 Opt. Mater. 90 7
Google Scholar
[12] Grim J Q, Ucer K B, Burger A, BhattacharyaP, Tupitsyn E, Rowe E, Buliga V M, Trefilova L, Gektin A, Bizarri G A, Moses W W, Williams R T 2013 Phys. Rev. B 87 125117
Google Scholar
[13] Williams R T, GrimJ Q, Li Q, Ucer K B, Bizarri G A, Kerisit S, Gao F, Bhattacharya P, Tupitsyn E, Rowe E, Buliga V M, Burger A 2013 Proc. SPIE 8852 88520J
Google Scholar
[14] 鲍杰, 陈永浩, 张显鹏, 等 2019 68 080101
Google Scholar
Bao J, Chen Y H, Zhang X P, et al. 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 080101
Google Scholar
[15] 任杰, 阮锡超, 陈永浩, 等 2020 69 172901
Google Scholar
Ren J, Ruan X C, Chen Y H, et al. 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 172901
Google Scholar
[16] Krzywinski J, Andrejczuk A, Bionta R M, Burian T, Chalupsky J, Jurek M, Krim M, Nagirnyi V, Sobierajski R, Tiedtke K, Vielhauer S, Juha L 2017 Opt. Mater. Express 7 665
Google Scholar
[17] Vielhauer S, Babina V, De Graziab M, Feldach E, Kirm M, Nagirnyi V, Vasil'ev A 2009 Proc. SPIE 7361 73610R
Google Scholar
[18] Vielhauer S, Babin V, De Grazia M, Feldbach E, Kirm M, Nagirnyi V, Vasil'ev A 2008 Phys. Solid State 50 1789
Google Scholar
[19] Kirm M, Andrejczuk A, Krzywinski J, Sobierajski R 2005 Phys. Stat. Sol.(c) 2 649
Google Scholar
[20] Förster T H 1948 Ann. Phys. 55 437
[21] Clegg R M, Herman B 1995 Methods Enzymol. 6 1
Google Scholar
[22] Wu P G, Brand L 1994 Anal. Biochem. 218 1
Google Scholar
[23] Belsky A N, Kamenskikh I A, Mikhailin V V, Pedrini C, Vasil'ev A N 1998 Radiat. Eff. Defect. S. 150 1
Google Scholar
[24] 施朝淑, 陈永虎, 张国斌, 许小亮, 汤洪高 2002 发光学报 23 217
Google Scholar
Shi C S, Chen Y H, Zhang G B, Xu X L, Tang H G 2002 Chin. J. Lumin. 23 217
Google Scholar
[25] Nagirnyi V, Dolgov S, Grigonis R, Kirm M, Nagornaya L L, Savikhin F, Sirutkaitis V, Vielhauer S, A. Vasil'ev A 2010 IEEE Trans Nucl. Sci. 57 1182
Google Scholar
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 5081
- PDF Downloads: 113
- Cited By: 0
