-
A monolayer bend waveguide is designed based on the features of Rayleigh-Bloch (RB) mode wave in one-dimensional diffraction grating. The feasibility that the RB mode wave can transmit along the bend waveguide is demonstrated by the time-domain and frequency-domain finite element method, respectively. The results show that two different modes of transmission wave exist because of employing the circled unit cells. They possess different acoustical energy localization positions. In mode-1, the energy is localized between unit cells. In mode-2, the energy is localized in the center of unit cell, therefore, acoustic wave transmits with nearly no loss. Modulated sinusoidal wave and Gaussian pulse wave are used in the time-domain investigation. Because only RB mode waves can transmit and different modes have different energy distributions, the bend waveguide acts as an acoustic filter for the broadband waves. This study is conducive to the acoustic wave directional transmission, acoustic signal detection and identification.
-
Keywords:
- Rayleigh-Bloch mode wave /
- bend waveguide /
- no-loss transmission /
- acoustic detection
[1] Khelif A, Choujaa A, Benchabane S, Djafari-Rouhani B, Laude V 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 4400Google Scholar
[2] Wu L Y, Chiang R Y, Tsai C N, Wu M L, Chen L W 2012 Appl. Phys. A 109 523Google Scholar
[3] Liu F M, Huang X Q, Chang C T 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 071911Google Scholar
[4] 王一鹤, 张志旺, 程营, 刘晓峻 2019 68 227805Google Scholar
Wang Y H, Zhang Z W, Cheng Y, Liu X J 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 227805Google Scholar
[5] Gulyaev Y V, Plesski V P 1989 Sov. Phys. Usp. 32 51Google Scholar
[6] Evans D V, Porter R 1999 J. Engine Math. 35 149Google Scholar
[7] Thompson I, Linton C M 2010 SIAM J. Appl. Math. 70 2975Google Scholar
[8] Evans D V, Porter R 2002 Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 55 481Google Scholar
[9] Linton C M, McIver M 2002 J. Fluid Mech. 470 85Google Scholar
[10] Bennetts L G, Peter M A, Montiel F 2017 J. Fluid Mech. 813 508Google Scholar
[11] Evans D V, Linton C M 1993 Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 46 643Google Scholar
[12] Atalar A, Koymen H, Oguz H K 2014 IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 61 2139Google Scholar
[13] Colquitt D J, Craster R V, Antonakakis T, Guenneau S 2015 Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 471 20140465Google Scholar
[14] Hurd R A 1954 Can. J. Phys. 32 727Google Scholar
[15] Li C H, Ke M Z, Zhang S W, Peng S S, Qiu C Y, Liu Z Y 2016 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 49 125304Google Scholar
[16] Zhao D G, Liu Z Y, Qiu C Y, He Z J, Cai F Y, Ke M Z 2007 Phys. Rev. B 76 144301Google Scholar
[17] Chaplain G J, Makwana M P, Craster R V 2019 Wave Motion 86 162Google Scholar
[18] Perter M A, Meylan M H 2007 J. Fluid Mech. 575 473Google Scholar
[19] Porter R, Evans D V 2005 Wave Motion 43 29Google Scholar
[20] Berry M V 1975 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 8 1952Google Scholar
[21] Boutin C, Rallu A, Hans S 2014 J. Mech. Phys. Solids 70 362Google Scholar
[22] Antonakakis T, Craster R V 2012 Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 468 1408Google Scholar
[23] Craster R V, Kaplunov J, Pichugin A V 2010 Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 466 2341Google Scholar
[24] Peng Y G, Qin C Z, Zhao D G, Shen Y X, Xu X Y, Bao M, Jia H, Zhu X F 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 13368Google Scholar
[25] Peng Y G, Shen Y X, Zhao D G, Zhu X F 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 110 173505Google Scholar
[26] Peng Y G, Shen Y X, Geng Z G, Li P Q, Zhu J, Zhu X F 2020 Sci. Bull. 65 1022Google Scholar
-
表 1 散射体簇几何参数(单位: mm)
Table 1. Geometrical parameters of the scattering cluster (Unit: mm).
rc R' R θ 单元个数N 10 22.5 2700/π π/90 46 -
[1] Khelif A, Choujaa A, Benchabane S, Djafari-Rouhani B, Laude V 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 4400Google Scholar
[2] Wu L Y, Chiang R Y, Tsai C N, Wu M L, Chen L W 2012 Appl. Phys. A 109 523Google Scholar
[3] Liu F M, Huang X Q, Chang C T 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 071911Google Scholar
[4] 王一鹤, 张志旺, 程营, 刘晓峻 2019 68 227805Google Scholar
Wang Y H, Zhang Z W, Cheng Y, Liu X J 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 227805Google Scholar
[5] Gulyaev Y V, Plesski V P 1989 Sov. Phys. Usp. 32 51Google Scholar
[6] Evans D V, Porter R 1999 J. Engine Math. 35 149Google Scholar
[7] Thompson I, Linton C M 2010 SIAM J. Appl. Math. 70 2975Google Scholar
[8] Evans D V, Porter R 2002 Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 55 481Google Scholar
[9] Linton C M, McIver M 2002 J. Fluid Mech. 470 85Google Scholar
[10] Bennetts L G, Peter M A, Montiel F 2017 J. Fluid Mech. 813 508Google Scholar
[11] Evans D V, Linton C M 1993 Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 46 643Google Scholar
[12] Atalar A, Koymen H, Oguz H K 2014 IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 61 2139Google Scholar
[13] Colquitt D J, Craster R V, Antonakakis T, Guenneau S 2015 Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 471 20140465Google Scholar
[14] Hurd R A 1954 Can. J. Phys. 32 727Google Scholar
[15] Li C H, Ke M Z, Zhang S W, Peng S S, Qiu C Y, Liu Z Y 2016 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 49 125304Google Scholar
[16] Zhao D G, Liu Z Y, Qiu C Y, He Z J, Cai F Y, Ke M Z 2007 Phys. Rev. B 76 144301Google Scholar
[17] Chaplain G J, Makwana M P, Craster R V 2019 Wave Motion 86 162Google Scholar
[18] Perter M A, Meylan M H 2007 J. Fluid Mech. 575 473Google Scholar
[19] Porter R, Evans D V 2005 Wave Motion 43 29Google Scholar
[20] Berry M V 1975 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 8 1952Google Scholar
[21] Boutin C, Rallu A, Hans S 2014 J. Mech. Phys. Solids 70 362Google Scholar
[22] Antonakakis T, Craster R V 2012 Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 468 1408Google Scholar
[23] Craster R V, Kaplunov J, Pichugin A V 2010 Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 466 2341Google Scholar
[24] Peng Y G, Qin C Z, Zhao D G, Shen Y X, Xu X Y, Bao M, Jia H, Zhu X F 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 13368Google Scholar
[25] Peng Y G, Shen Y X, Zhao D G, Zhu X F 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 110 173505Google Scholar
[26] Peng Y G, Shen Y X, Geng Z G, Li P Q, Zhu J, Zhu X F 2020 Sci. Bull. 65 1022Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 5475
- PDF Downloads: 75
- Cited By: 0