-
Pentamode metamaterial (PM) is a kind of artificial microstructure extremum material with solid morphology and fluid properties proposed by Milton and Cherkaey. By decoupling the compression and the shear waves, the periodic structure is difficult to be compressed, but the shear deformation occurs easily. Theoretically, acoustic metamaterials consisting of such periodic arrangement of structural units can achieve complete matching with water. Therefore, the characteristics of adjustable modulus anisotropy, small stuffing rate and broadband endow the PMs with excellent acoustic control ability, which has attracted more attention of researchers. In this paper, the narrow-diameter intersection point P (0.25a, 0.25a, 0.25a) of an isotropic three-dimensional PM selected as the reference point in four different directions (X-axis, Y-axis, Z-axis and body diagonal). When the P-point moves, the farther the P-point is, the greater the degree of anisotropy is. The introduction of anisotropy will cause the structural bifurcation of the three-dimensional PM to change structural parameters, and the structural parameters are important factors affecting the band characteristics of the three-dimensional PM of Bragg scattering. In order to study the influence of anisotropy on the band structure and pentamode properties of three-dimensional asymmetric double-cone PMs, we use the finite element simulation software COMSOL to calculate the primitive-cell of three-dimensional anisotropic PMs under Bloch boundary conditions. By adjusting the position of P point, four different types of three-dimensional anisotropic asymmetric double-cone PMs are constructed. Since the anisotropy changes in different directions have different effects on the parameters of the asymmetric double-cone structure, the band characteristics and the pentamode characteristics will also receive different degrees of influence. In this paper, the relationship between the degree of anisotropy and the band gap characteristics, single-mode region and figure of merit (FOM) are given, and the result can provide guidance for the design of asymmetric double-cone PM acoustic device. Compared with the isotropic double-cone PMs, the relative bandwidth of the first band gap of the anisotropic double-cone PMs can be broadened to 123%, and the FOM can be increased to 6.9 times. Due to the introduction of anisotropy, Due to the introduction of anisotropy, the structure of three-dimensional asymmetric double-cone PMs are more complex, the demand for sample fabrication is further improved, and the stability of PMs also reduced. Therefore, PMs with high stability and easy to be fabricated still needs further research and exploration. -
Keywords:
- pentamode metamaterial /
- anisotropy /
- phononic band gap /
- broadband
[1] Milton G W, Cherkaev A V 1995 J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 117 483Google Scholar
[2] Kadic M, Bückmann T, Stenger N, Thiel M, Wegener M 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 191901Google Scholar
[3] 陈毅, 刘晓宁, 向平, 胡更开 2016 力学进展 46 201609Google Scholar
Chen Y, Liu X N, Xiang P, Hu G K 2016 Adv. Mech. 46 201609Google Scholar
[4] 王兆宏, 蔡成欣, 楚杨阳, 刘广顺 2017 光电工程 44 34Google Scholar
Wang Z H, Cai C X, Chu Y Y, Liu G S 2017 Opto-Electron. Eng. 44 34Google Scholar
[5] Milton G W, Briane M, Wills J R 2006 New J. Phys. 8 248Google Scholar
[6] Norris A N 2008 Proc. R. Soc. A 464 2411Google Scholar
[7] Scandrett L C, Boisvert J E, Howarth T R 2010 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127 2856Google Scholar
[8] Scandrett L C, Boisvert J E, Howarth T R 2011 Wave Motion 48 505Google Scholar
[9] Boisvert J E, Scandrett L C, Howarth T R 2016 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 139 3404Google Scholar
[10] Schittny R, Bückmann T, Kadic M, Wegener M 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 231905Google Scholar
[11] Gokhale N H, Cipolla J L, Norris A N 2012 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132 4
[12] Kadic M, Buckmann T, Schittny R, Gumbsch P, Wegener M 2014 Phys. Rev. Appl. 2 054007Google Scholar
[13] Cai C X, Wang Z H, Li Q W, Xu Z, Tian X G 2015 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 48 175103Google Scholar
[14] Huang Y, Lu X G, Liang G Y, Xu Z 2016 Phys. Lett. A 380 1334Google Scholar
[15] Wang G, Jin L, Zhang L, Xu Z 2017 AIP Adv. 7 025309Google Scholar
[16] Tian Y, Wei Q, Cheng Y, Xu Z, Liu X J 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 107 221906Google Scholar
[17] Sun Z Y, Jia H, Chen Y, Wang Z, Yang J 2018 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 143 1029Google Scholar
[18] Chen Y, Liu X N, Hu G K 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 15745Google Scholar
[19] Chen J G, Liu J H, Liu X Z 2018 AIP Adv. 8 085024Google Scholar
[20] 张向东, 陈虹, 王磊, 赵志高, 赵爱国 2015 64 134303Google Scholar
Zhang X D, Chen H, Wang L, Zhao Z G, Zhao A G 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 134303Google Scholar
[21] 陆智淼, 蔡力, 温激鸿, 温熙森 2016 65 174301Google Scholar
Lu Z M, Cai L, Wen J H, Wen X S 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 174301Google Scholar
[22] Chen H Y, Chan C T 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 183518Google Scholar
[23] Chen H Y, Chan C T 2010 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 43 113001Google Scholar
[24] Cai C X, Han C, Wu J F, Wang Z H, Zhang Q H 2019 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 52 045601Google Scholar
[25] Wang Z H, Cai C X, Li Q W, Li J, Xu Z 2016 J. Appl. Phys. 120 024903Google Scholar
[26] Bückmann T, Schittny R, Thiel M, Kadic M, Milton G W, Wegener M 2014 New J. Phys. 16 033032Google Scholar
-
-
[1] Milton G W, Cherkaev A V 1995 J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 117 483Google Scholar
[2] Kadic M, Bückmann T, Stenger N, Thiel M, Wegener M 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 191901Google Scholar
[3] 陈毅, 刘晓宁, 向平, 胡更开 2016 力学进展 46 201609Google Scholar
Chen Y, Liu X N, Xiang P, Hu G K 2016 Adv. Mech. 46 201609Google Scholar
[4] 王兆宏, 蔡成欣, 楚杨阳, 刘广顺 2017 光电工程 44 34Google Scholar
Wang Z H, Cai C X, Chu Y Y, Liu G S 2017 Opto-Electron. Eng. 44 34Google Scholar
[5] Milton G W, Briane M, Wills J R 2006 New J. Phys. 8 248Google Scholar
[6] Norris A N 2008 Proc. R. Soc. A 464 2411Google Scholar
[7] Scandrett L C, Boisvert J E, Howarth T R 2010 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127 2856Google Scholar
[8] Scandrett L C, Boisvert J E, Howarth T R 2011 Wave Motion 48 505Google Scholar
[9] Boisvert J E, Scandrett L C, Howarth T R 2016 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 139 3404Google Scholar
[10] Schittny R, Bückmann T, Kadic M, Wegener M 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 231905Google Scholar
[11] Gokhale N H, Cipolla J L, Norris A N 2012 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132 4
[12] Kadic M, Buckmann T, Schittny R, Gumbsch P, Wegener M 2014 Phys. Rev. Appl. 2 054007Google Scholar
[13] Cai C X, Wang Z H, Li Q W, Xu Z, Tian X G 2015 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 48 175103Google Scholar
[14] Huang Y, Lu X G, Liang G Y, Xu Z 2016 Phys. Lett. A 380 1334Google Scholar
[15] Wang G, Jin L, Zhang L, Xu Z 2017 AIP Adv. 7 025309Google Scholar
[16] Tian Y, Wei Q, Cheng Y, Xu Z, Liu X J 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 107 221906Google Scholar
[17] Sun Z Y, Jia H, Chen Y, Wang Z, Yang J 2018 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 143 1029Google Scholar
[18] Chen Y, Liu X N, Hu G K 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 15745Google Scholar
[19] Chen J G, Liu J H, Liu X Z 2018 AIP Adv. 8 085024Google Scholar
[20] 张向东, 陈虹, 王磊, 赵志高, 赵爱国 2015 64 134303Google Scholar
Zhang X D, Chen H, Wang L, Zhao Z G, Zhao A G 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 134303Google Scholar
[21] 陆智淼, 蔡力, 温激鸿, 温熙森 2016 65 174301Google Scholar
Lu Z M, Cai L, Wen J H, Wen X S 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 174301Google Scholar
[22] Chen H Y, Chan C T 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 183518Google Scholar
[23] Chen H Y, Chan C T 2010 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 43 113001Google Scholar
[24] Cai C X, Han C, Wu J F, Wang Z H, Zhang Q H 2019 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 52 045601Google Scholar
[25] Wang Z H, Cai C X, Li Q W, Li J, Xu Z 2016 J. Appl. Phys. 120 024903Google Scholar
[26] Bückmann T, Schittny R, Thiel M, Kadic M, Milton G W, Wegener M 2014 New J. Phys. 16 033032Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 8490
- PDF Downloads: 172
- Cited By: 0