-
Under suitable external perturbation such as optical feedback, optical injection or optoelectronic feedback, semiconductor lasers can be driven to realize diverse dynamic outputs including period-one, period-two, multi-period, pulse packages（PPs), chaos, etc., which have potential applications in optical secure communications, microwave photonics, lidar, high speed random signal generation, etc.. For the PPs dynamics, most of previous relevant investigations are usually based on a system composed of discrete elements. In this work, we experimentally investigate the PP dynamical characteristics in a three-section monolithically integrated amplified feedback laser（AFL) composed of a distributed feedback（DFB) laser section, a phase（P) section, and an amplified feedback（A) section. For the AFL, the sections P and A act as a compounded feedback cavity in which the feedback phase and strength can be varied by adjusting the current in section P（IP) and the current in section A（IA), respectively. Via the power spectrum and self-correlation function curve of the time series output from the AFL, the influences of IP and IA on repeated frequency（PP) and regularity of PPs are analyzed in detail. The results indicate that, for the section DFB, whose current（IDFB) is biased at a relatively large level, the AFL can realize two-mode oscillation. After further choosing appropriate IP and IA, the AFL can behave as the dynamical state of PPs. Under IDFB=86.15 mA and IP=96.00 mA, through varying IA in a range of 6.50-10.50 mA, there exist two separated regions for IA to make the AFL operate at PPs. For the region with relatively small value of IA, both PP and the secondary maximum（) of self-correlation curve characterizing the regularity of PPs monotonically decrease with the increase of IA. However, for the region with relatively large value of IA, with the increase of IA, PP first decreases and then fluctuates in a tiny range, but first increases, and further reaches an extreme value, and then decreases. Under IDFB=86.15 mA and IA=9.00 mA, the output characteristics of PPs are significantly affected by IP. With IP increasing from 90.5 mA to 96.5 mA, PP first decreases, and then increases after reaching a minimal value, meanwhile shows an approximately opposite variation trend. Finally, for IDFB=86.15 mA, the mapping of PPs in the parameter space of IP and IA is given and the evolution regularities of PPs are also presented.
[1] Lin C F, Su Y S, Wu B R 2002 IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 14 3
[2] Koyama F 2006 J. Lightwave Technol. 24 4502
[3] Iga K 2000 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 6 1201
[4] Hu H P, Yu Z L, Liu L F 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 190504(in Chinese)[胡汉平, 于志良, 刘凌锋2012 61 190504]
[5] Kim B, Locquet A, Choi D, Citrin D S 2015 Phys. Rev. A 91 061802
[6] Zhong D Z, Ji Y Q, Deng T, Zhou K L 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 114203(in Chinese)[钟东洲, 计永强, 邓涛, 周开利2015 64 114203]
[7] Lenstra D, Verbeek B H, Den Boef A J 1985 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 21 674
[8] Kong L Q, Wang A B, Wang H H, Wang Y C 2008 Acta Phys. Sin. 57 2266(in Chinese)[孔令琴, 王安帮, 王海红, 王云才2008 57 2266]
[9] Hong Y H, Spencer P S, Shore K A 2004 Opt. Lett. 29 2151
[10] Li N Q, Pan W, Xiang S Y, Luo B, Yan L S, Zou X H 2013 Appl. Opt. 52 1523
[11] Liu H J, Feng J C 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 1484(in Chinese)[刘慧杰, 冯久超2009 58 1484]
[12] Pan B W, Lu D, Sun Y, Yu L Q, Zhang L M, Zhao L J 2014 Opt. Lett. 39 6395
[13] Jin S Z, Li Y Q, Xiao M 1996 Appl. Opt. 35 1436
[14] Lin F Y, Liu J M 2004 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 10 991
[15] Tager A A, Elenkrig B B 1993 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 29 2886
[16] Heil T, Fischer I, Elsäßer W, Gavrielides A 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 243901
[17] Tabaka A, Panajotov K, Veretennicoff I, Sciamanna M 2004 Phys. Rev. E 70 036221
[18] Tabaka A, Peil M, Sciamanna M, Fischer I, Elsäßer W, Thienpont H, Veretennicoff I, Panajotov K 2006 Phys. Rev. A 73 013810
[19] Peil M, Fischer I, Elsäßer W 2006 Phys. Rev. A 73 023805
[20] Koch T L, Koren U 1991 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 27 641
[21] Charbonneau S, Koteles E S, Poole P J, He J J, Aers G C, Haysom J, Buchanan M, Feng Y, Delage A, Yang F, Davies M, Goldberg R D, Piva P G, Mitchell I V 1998 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 4 772
[22] Yu L Q, Lu D, Pan B W, Zhao L J, Wu J G, Xia G Q, Wu Z M, Wang W 2014 J. Lightwave Technol. 32 3595
[23] Monfils I, Cartledge J C 2009 J. Lightwave Technol. 27 619
[24] Bauer S, Brox O, Kreissl J, Sahin G, Sartorius B 2002 Electron. Lett. 38 334
[25] Yee D S, Leem Y A, Kim S T, Park K H, Kim B G 2007 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 43 1095
[26] Bauer S, Brox O, Kreissl J, Sartorius B, Radziunas M, Sieber J, Wnsche H J, Henneberger F 2004 Phys. Rev. E 69 016206
[27] Loose A, Goswami B K, Wnsche H J, Henneberger F 2009 Phys. Rev. E 79 036211
[28] Wu J G, Zhao L J, Wu Z M, Lu D, Tang X, Zhong Z Q, Xia G Q 2013 Opt. Express 21 23358
[29] Toomey J P, Kane D M, Mcmahon C, Argyris A, Syvridis D 2015 Opt. Express 23 18754
-
[1] Lin C F, Su Y S, Wu B R 2002 IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 14 3
[2] Koyama F 2006 J. Lightwave Technol. 24 4502
[3] Iga K 2000 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 6 1201
[4] Hu H P, Yu Z L, Liu L F 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 190504(in Chinese)[胡汉平, 于志良, 刘凌锋2012 61 190504]
[5] Kim B, Locquet A, Choi D, Citrin D S 2015 Phys. Rev. A 91 061802
[6] Zhong D Z, Ji Y Q, Deng T, Zhou K L 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 114203(in Chinese)[钟东洲, 计永强, 邓涛, 周开利2015 64 114203]
[7] Lenstra D, Verbeek B H, Den Boef A J 1985 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 21 674
[8] Kong L Q, Wang A B, Wang H H, Wang Y C 2008 Acta Phys. Sin. 57 2266(in Chinese)[孔令琴, 王安帮, 王海红, 王云才2008 57 2266]
[9] Hong Y H, Spencer P S, Shore K A 2004 Opt. Lett. 29 2151
[10] Li N Q, Pan W, Xiang S Y, Luo B, Yan L S, Zou X H 2013 Appl. Opt. 52 1523
[11] Liu H J, Feng J C 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 1484(in Chinese)[刘慧杰, 冯久超2009 58 1484]
[12] Pan B W, Lu D, Sun Y, Yu L Q, Zhang L M, Zhao L J 2014 Opt. Lett. 39 6395
[13] Jin S Z, Li Y Q, Xiao M 1996 Appl. Opt. 35 1436
[14] Lin F Y, Liu J M 2004 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 10 991
[15] Tager A A, Elenkrig B B 1993 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 29 2886
[16] Heil T, Fischer I, Elsäßer W, Gavrielides A 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 243901
[17] Tabaka A, Panajotov K, Veretennicoff I, Sciamanna M 2004 Phys. Rev. E 70 036221
[18] Tabaka A, Peil M, Sciamanna M, Fischer I, Elsäßer W, Thienpont H, Veretennicoff I, Panajotov K 2006 Phys. Rev. A 73 013810
[19] Peil M, Fischer I, Elsäßer W 2006 Phys. Rev. A 73 023805
[20] Koch T L, Koren U 1991 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 27 641
[21] Charbonneau S, Koteles E S, Poole P J, He J J, Aers G C, Haysom J, Buchanan M, Feng Y, Delage A, Yang F, Davies M, Goldberg R D, Piva P G, Mitchell I V 1998 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 4 772
[22] Yu L Q, Lu D, Pan B W, Zhao L J, Wu J G, Xia G Q, Wu Z M, Wang W 2014 J. Lightwave Technol. 32 3595
[23] Monfils I, Cartledge J C 2009 J. Lightwave Technol. 27 619
[24] Bauer S, Brox O, Kreissl J, Sahin G, Sartorius B 2002 Electron. Lett. 38 334
[25] Yee D S, Leem Y A, Kim S T, Park K H, Kim B G 2007 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 43 1095
[26] Bauer S, Brox O, Kreissl J, Sartorius B, Radziunas M, Sieber J, Wnsche H J, Henneberger F 2004 Phys. Rev. E 69 016206
[27] Loose A, Goswami B K, Wnsche H J, Henneberger F 2009 Phys. Rev. E 79 036211
[28] Wu J G, Zhao L J, Wu Z M, Lu D, Tang X, Zhong Z Q, Xia G Q 2013 Opt. Express 21 23358
[29] Toomey J P, Kane D M, Mcmahon C, Argyris A, Syvridis D 2015 Opt. Express 23 18754
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 5811
- PDF Downloads: 171
- Cited By: 0
下载:
