-
Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution is immune from all the detection attacks, thus when it is combined with the decoy state method, the final key is unconditional secure. In this paper, the performance of three-intensity decoy state measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution at an asymmetric channel transmittance efficiency is considered and compared with each other at the symmetric choice scenario. Simulation result shows that the key rate at the symmetric scenario can tolerate 62 dB channel loss, otherwise when the distance ratio changes, the tolerated channel loss will decrease to 37 dB and 19 dB. A method to choose the optimal intensity is proposed for asymmetric channel transmittance regardless of distance ratio, which can be easily adapted to practical experimental settings.
-
Keywords:
- decoy state /
- measurement device independent quantum key distribution /
- asymmetric channel transmittance efficiency
[1] Bennet C H, Brassard G 1984 Proc IEEE International Conference Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing Bangalore, India, December 9–12, 1984, p175–179
[2] Shor P W, Preskill J 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 441
[3] Mayers D 2001 Journal of the ACM 48 351
[4] Gottesman D, Lo H K, Lutkenhaus N, Preskill J 2004 Quantum Infor. Comput 4 325
[5] Zhou Y Y, Zhou X T, Tian P G, Wang Y J 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 010305
[6] Sheng Y B, Zhou L, Cheng W W, Gong L Y, Wang L, Zhan S M 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 030314
[7] Wang J D, Qin X J, Wei Z J, Liu X B, Liao C J, Liu S H 2010 Acta Phys. Sin. 59 281 (in Chinese) [王金东, 秦晓娟, 魏正军, 刘小宝, 廖常俊, 刘颂豪 2010 59 281]
[8] Zhang Y, Wang S, Yin Z Q, Chen W, Liang W Y, Li H W, Guo G C, Han Z F 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 100307
[9] Zhou R R Yang L 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 080301
[10] Qin X J, Zhong P P, Zhang H N, Wang J D, Wei Z J, Chen S, Liu S H 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 050307
[11] Brassard G Lutkenhaus N, Mor T, Sanders B C 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 1330
[12] Sun S H, Liang L M 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett 101 071107
[13] Makarov V, Skaar J 2008 Quantum Infor. Comput. 86 0622
[14] Zhao Y, Fung C H F, Qi B, Chen C, Lo H K 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 042333
[15] Makarov V 2009 New Journal of Modern Optics. 11 065003
[16] Acín A, Brunner N, Gisin N, Massar S, Pironio S, Scarani V 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett 98 230501
[17] Pironio S, Acín A, Brunner N, Gisin N, Massar S, Scarani V 2009 New J. Phys. 11 045021
[18] Lo H K, Curty M Qi B 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett 108 130503
[19] Hwang W Y 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 057901
[20] Ma X F, Fung C H F, Razavi M 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 052305
[21] Wang X B 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 012320
[22] Sun S H Gao M, Li C Y, Liang L M 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 052329
[23] Liu Y, Chen T Y, Wang L J, Lao H, Shentu G L, Wian J, Cui K, Yin H L, Liu N L, Li L, Ma X F, Pele J S, Fejer M M, Zhang Q, Pan J W 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett 111 130502
[24] Tang Z, Liao Z, Xu F, Qi B, Qian L, Lo H K 2013 arXiv: 13066134
[25] Rubenok A, Slater J A, Chan P, Martinez I L, Tittel W 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 130501
[26] Sasaki M, Fujiwara M, Ishizuka H, Klaus W, Wakui K, Takeoka M, Tanaka A, Yoshino K, Nambu Y, Takahashi S, Tajima A, Tomita A, Domeki T, Hasegawa T, Sakai Y, Kobayashi H, Asai T, Shimizu K, Tokura T, Tsurumaru T, Matsui M, Honjo T, Tamaki K, Takesue H, Tokura Y, Dynes J F, Dixon A R, Sharpe A W, Yuan Z L, Shields A J, Uchikoga S, Legre M, Robyr S, Trinkler P, Monat L, Page J B, Ribordy G, Poppe A, Allacher A, Maurthart O, Langer T, Peev M, Zeilinger A 2011 Opt. Express 19 10387
[27] Ma X F, Razavi M 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 62319
-
[1] Bennet C H, Brassard G 1984 Proc IEEE International Conference Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing Bangalore, India, December 9–12, 1984, p175–179
[2] Shor P W, Preskill J 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 441
[3] Mayers D 2001 Journal of the ACM 48 351
[4] Gottesman D, Lo H K, Lutkenhaus N, Preskill J 2004 Quantum Infor. Comput 4 325
[5] Zhou Y Y, Zhou X T, Tian P G, Wang Y J 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 010305
[6] Sheng Y B, Zhou L, Cheng W W, Gong L Y, Wang L, Zhan S M 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 030314
[7] Wang J D, Qin X J, Wei Z J, Liu X B, Liao C J, Liu S H 2010 Acta Phys. Sin. 59 281 (in Chinese) [王金东, 秦晓娟, 魏正军, 刘小宝, 廖常俊, 刘颂豪 2010 59 281]
[8] Zhang Y, Wang S, Yin Z Q, Chen W, Liang W Y, Li H W, Guo G C, Han Z F 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 100307
[9] Zhou R R Yang L 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 080301
[10] Qin X J, Zhong P P, Zhang H N, Wang J D, Wei Z J, Chen S, Liu S H 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 050307
[11] Brassard G Lutkenhaus N, Mor T, Sanders B C 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 1330
[12] Sun S H, Liang L M 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett 101 071107
[13] Makarov V, Skaar J 2008 Quantum Infor. Comput. 86 0622
[14] Zhao Y, Fung C H F, Qi B, Chen C, Lo H K 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 042333
[15] Makarov V 2009 New Journal of Modern Optics. 11 065003
[16] Acín A, Brunner N, Gisin N, Massar S, Pironio S, Scarani V 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett 98 230501
[17] Pironio S, Acín A, Brunner N, Gisin N, Massar S, Scarani V 2009 New J. Phys. 11 045021
[18] Lo H K, Curty M Qi B 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett 108 130503
[19] Hwang W Y 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 057901
[20] Ma X F, Fung C H F, Razavi M 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 052305
[21] Wang X B 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 012320
[22] Sun S H Gao M, Li C Y, Liang L M 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 052329
[23] Liu Y, Chen T Y, Wang L J, Lao H, Shentu G L, Wian J, Cui K, Yin H L, Liu N L, Li L, Ma X F, Pele J S, Fejer M M, Zhang Q, Pan J W 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett 111 130502
[24] Tang Z, Liao Z, Xu F, Qi B, Qian L, Lo H K 2013 arXiv: 13066134
[25] Rubenok A, Slater J A, Chan P, Martinez I L, Tittel W 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 130501
[26] Sasaki M, Fujiwara M, Ishizuka H, Klaus W, Wakui K, Takeoka M, Tanaka A, Yoshino K, Nambu Y, Takahashi S, Tajima A, Tomita A, Domeki T, Hasegawa T, Sakai Y, Kobayashi H, Asai T, Shimizu K, Tokura T, Tsurumaru T, Matsui M, Honjo T, Tamaki K, Takesue H, Tokura Y, Dynes J F, Dixon A R, Sharpe A W, Yuan Z L, Shields A J, Uchikoga S, Legre M, Robyr S, Trinkler P, Monat L, Page J B, Ribordy G, Poppe A, Allacher A, Maurthart O, Langer T, Peev M, Zeilinger A 2011 Opt. Express 19 10387
[27] Ma X F, Razavi M 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 62319
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 6197
- PDF Downloads: 648
- Cited By: 0