-
精确测量离子与原子碰撞引起的靶原子内壳层电离截面，对研究原子内壳层过程以及建立合适的理论模型具有重要的意义.现有的实验数据和理论模型大都集中在中低能区，高能区由于受到实验条件的限制，几乎没有相关实验数据的报道，哪种理论更适合描述高能重离子入射的靶原子内壳层电离截面，还需要进行深入的实验研究.采用电子冷却存储环提供能量分别为165，300，350，430 MeV/u的C6+离子束轰击Ni靶，测量Ni的K壳层X射线.分析了实验中探测到的Ni的K和K射线强度比，发现入射粒子能量的变化对该强度比影响不明显.分别应用两体碰撞近似（BEA）、平面波玻恩近似（PWBA）和ECPSSR理论对Ni的K壳层X射线的产生截面进行理论计算，并将理论结果与实验结果进行比较.Accurate measurement of the ionization cross section of the target atom induced by collision between ions and atoms is of great significance for studying the atomic shell process and establishing a suitable theoretical model. The experimental data and the theoretical models mostly concentrate on the cases in the low energy region at present. Only a few experimental data of high energy region are reported due to the limitation of experimental conditions. Which theory is more suitable to describe the ionization cross section of the inner shell of the target atom caused by the high energy heavy ions, is necessarily studied experimentally. The C6+ ions provided by the Heavy Ion Research Facility in Lanzhou Electron Cooling Storage Ring, are used to bombard the Ni target, in which the K-shell X-ray of Ni is measured. The incident energies of C6+ ions are 165, 300, 350 and 430 MeV/u respectively. Through analyzing the intensity ratio of K/K X-ray of Ni, it is found that the influence of incident energy on the intensity ratio of K/K X-ray is not obvious. The intensity ratios of this experiment are greater than the experimental values of incident proton and the calculated values based on the Hartree-Slater theory, which may be caused by the multiple-ionization of the L shell. The production cross sections of Ni K-shell X-ray are calculated by the binary encounter approximation (BEA) model, the plane wave Born approximation (PWBA) model and the energy-loss coulomb-repulsion perturbed-stationary-state relativistic (ECPSSR) theory respectively, which are compared with the experimental results in this paper. It is found that the experimental cross section increases with the increasing incident energy, which is consistent with the trend of BEA model estimation, but the experimental value is obviously lower than the theoretical value. We think that BEA model needs to be modified when describing the ionization process in the high energy region.
-
Keywords:
- X-ray /
- production cross section /
- high energy pulsed beam
[1] Dennerl K, Englhauser J, Trmper J 1997 Science 277 1625
[2] Hu Z M, Han X Y, Li Y M, Kato D J, Tong X M, Nakamura N 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 073002
[3] Zhou X M, Zhao Y T, Cheng R, Lei Y, Wang Y Y, Ren J R, Liu S D, Mei C X, Chen X M, Xiao G Q 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 027901 (in Chinese) [周贤明, 赵永涛, 程锐, 雷瑜, 王瑜玉, 任洁茹, 刘世东, 梅策香, 陈熙萌, 肖国青 2016 65 027901]
[4] Lapicki G, Murty G A V R, Raju G J N, Reddy B S, Reddy S B, Vijayan V 2004 Phys. Rev. A 70 062718
[5] Wang X, Zhao Y T, Chen R, Zhou X M, Xu G, Sun Y B, Lei Y, Wang Y Y, Ren J R, Yu Y, Li Y F, Zhang X A, Li Y Z, Liang C H, Xiao G Q 2012 Phys. Lett. A 376 1197
[6] Liang C H, Zhang X A, Li Y Z, Zhao Y T, Mei C X, Zhou X M, Xiao G Q 2013 Acta. Phys. Sin. 62 063202 (in Chinese) [梁昌慧, 张小安, 李耀宗, 赵永涛, 梅策香, 周贤明, 肖国青 2013 62 063202]
[7] Mei C X, Zhao Y T, Zhang X A, Ren J R, Zhou X M, Wang X, Lei Y, Liang C H, Li Y Z, Xiao G Q 2012 Laser Part. Beams 30 665
[8] Merzbacher E, Lewis H W 1958 Handbuch der Physik 6 166
[9] Lapicki G, Laubert R, Brandt W 1980 Phys. Rev. A 22 1889
[10] Brandt W, Lapicki G 1981 Phys. Rev. A 23 1717
[11] Lapicki G, Zander A R 1981 Phys. Rev. A 23 2072
[12] Lapicki G 2002 Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 19 8
[13] Kocbach L, Hansteen J M, Gundersen R 1980 Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 169 281
[14] McGuire J H, Richard P 1973 Phys. Rev. A 8 1374
[15] Fano U, Lichten W 1965 Phys. Rev. Lett 14 627
[16] Kessler J E G, Deslatts R D, Girard D, Schwitz W, Jacobs L, Renner O 1982 Phys. Rev. A 26 2696
[17] Thompson A C, Kirz J, Attwood D T, Gullikson E M, Howells M R, Kortright J B, Robinson A L, Underwood J M 2009 X-ray Data Booklet (3rd Ed.)
[18] Scofield J H 1974 Phys. Rev. A 9 1041
[19] Slabkowska K, Polasik M 2003 Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 205 123
[20] Zhou X M, Cheng R, Lei Y, Sun Y B, Wang Y Y, Wang X, Xu G, Mei C X, Zhang X A, Chen X M, Xiao G Q, Zhao Y T 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 023402
[21] Gryzinski M 1965 Phys. Rev. A 138 336
[22] Liu Z, Cipolla S J 1996 Comp. Phys. Comm. 97 315
[23] Benka O, Kropf A 1978 Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 22 219
[24] Krause M O 1979 J. Phys. Chem. Ref. 8 307
[25] Tawara H, Richard P, Gray T J, Newcomb J, Jamison K A, Schmiedekamp C, Hall J M 1978 Phys. Rev. A 18 1373
[26] Czarnota M, Banaś D, Braziewicz J, Semaniak J, Pajek M 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 032710
-
[1] Dennerl K, Englhauser J, Trmper J 1997 Science 277 1625
[2] Hu Z M, Han X Y, Li Y M, Kato D J, Tong X M, Nakamura N 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 073002
[3] Zhou X M, Zhao Y T, Cheng R, Lei Y, Wang Y Y, Ren J R, Liu S D, Mei C X, Chen X M, Xiao G Q 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 027901 (in Chinese) [周贤明, 赵永涛, 程锐, 雷瑜, 王瑜玉, 任洁茹, 刘世东, 梅策香, 陈熙萌, 肖国青 2016 65 027901]
[4] Lapicki G, Murty G A V R, Raju G J N, Reddy B S, Reddy S B, Vijayan V 2004 Phys. Rev. A 70 062718
[5] Wang X, Zhao Y T, Chen R, Zhou X M, Xu G, Sun Y B, Lei Y, Wang Y Y, Ren J R, Yu Y, Li Y F, Zhang X A, Li Y Z, Liang C H, Xiao G Q 2012 Phys. Lett. A 376 1197
[6] Liang C H, Zhang X A, Li Y Z, Zhao Y T, Mei C X, Zhou X M, Xiao G Q 2013 Acta. Phys. Sin. 62 063202 (in Chinese) [梁昌慧, 张小安, 李耀宗, 赵永涛, 梅策香, 周贤明, 肖国青 2013 62 063202]
[7] Mei C X, Zhao Y T, Zhang X A, Ren J R, Zhou X M, Wang X, Lei Y, Liang C H, Li Y Z, Xiao G Q 2012 Laser Part. Beams 30 665
[8] Merzbacher E, Lewis H W 1958 Handbuch der Physik 6 166
[9] Lapicki G, Laubert R, Brandt W 1980 Phys. Rev. A 22 1889
[10] Brandt W, Lapicki G 1981 Phys. Rev. A 23 1717
[11] Lapicki G, Zander A R 1981 Phys. Rev. A 23 2072
[12] Lapicki G 2002 Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 19 8
[13] Kocbach L, Hansteen J M, Gundersen R 1980 Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 169 281
[14] McGuire J H, Richard P 1973 Phys. Rev. A 8 1374
[15] Fano U, Lichten W 1965 Phys. Rev. Lett 14 627
[16] Kessler J E G, Deslatts R D, Girard D, Schwitz W, Jacobs L, Renner O 1982 Phys. Rev. A 26 2696
[17] Thompson A C, Kirz J, Attwood D T, Gullikson E M, Howells M R, Kortright J B, Robinson A L, Underwood J M 2009 X-ray Data Booklet (3rd Ed.)
[18] Scofield J H 1974 Phys. Rev. A 9 1041
[19] Slabkowska K, Polasik M 2003 Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 205 123
[20] Zhou X M, Cheng R, Lei Y, Sun Y B, Wang Y Y, Wang X, Xu G, Mei C X, Zhang X A, Chen X M, Xiao G Q, Zhao Y T 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 023402
[21] Gryzinski M 1965 Phys. Rev. A 138 336
[22] Liu Z, Cipolla S J 1996 Comp. Phys. Comm. 97 315
[23] Benka O, Kropf A 1978 Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 22 219
[24] Krause M O 1979 J. Phys. Chem. Ref. 8 307
[25] Tawara H, Richard P, Gray T J, Newcomb J, Jamison K A, Schmiedekamp C, Hall J M 1978 Phys. Rev. A 18 1373
[26] Czarnota M, Banaś D, Braziewicz J, Semaniak J, Pajek M 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 032710
-
[1] 周贤明, 尉静, 程锐, 梁昌慧, 陈燕红, 赵永涛, 张小安. 近玻尔速度不同离子碰撞产生Al的K X射线. , 2023, 72(1): 013402. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221628 [2] 周贤明, 尉静, 程锐, 梅策香, 曾利霞, 王兴, 梁昌慧, 赵永涛, 张小安. 数百MeV/u高能区C6+离子激发W的L壳层 X射线. , 2022, 71(11): 113201. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20212322 [3] 周贤明, 尉静, 程锐, 梅策香, 曾利霞, 王兴, 梁昌慧, 赵永涛, 张小安. 数百MeV/u高能区C6+离子激发W的L X射线研究. , 2022, 0(0): 0-0. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20212322 [4] 张秉章, 宋张勇, 刘璇, 钱程, 方兴, 邵曹杰, 王伟, 刘俊亮, 徐俊奎, 冯勇, 朱志超, 郭艳玲, 陈林, 孙良亭, 杨治虎, 于得洋. 低能高电荷态 ${\boldsymbol{ {\rm{O}}^{q+}}}$ 离子与Al表面作用产生的X射线. , 2021, 70(19): 193201. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210757[5] 梁昌慧, 张小安, 周贤明, 赵永涛, 肖国青. Bragg峰能区Xe20+与不同靶作用产生的X射线. , 2021, 70(18): 183201. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210215 [6] 强鹏飞, 盛立志, 李林森, 闫永清, 刘哲, 周晓红. X射线聚焦望远镜光学设计. , 2019, 68(16): 160702. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190709 [7] 侯兴民, 章程, 邱锦涛, 顾建伟, 王瑞雪, 邵涛. 大气压管板结构纳秒脉冲放电中时域X射线研究. , 2017, 66(10): 105204. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.105204 [8] 刘学, 冉宪文, 徐志宏, 汤文辉. 多能复合谱电子束与X射线能量沉积剖面的等效性. , 2017, 66(2): 025202. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.025202 [9] 梁昌慧, 张小安, 李耀宗, 赵永涛, 肖国青. 不同动能的129Xe26+与Au表面作用产生的X射线谱. , 2014, 63(16): 163201. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.163201 [10] 黄开, 闫文超, 李明华, 陶孟泽, 陈燕萍, 陈洁, 远晓辉, 赵家瑞, 马勇, 李大章, 高杰, 陈黎明, 张杰. kHz激光与固体靶相互作用产生的X射线源. , 2013, 62(20): 205204. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.205204 [11] 梁昌慧, 张小安, 李耀宗, 赵永涛, 梅策香, 程锐, 周贤明, 雷瑜, 王兴, 孙渊博, 肖国青. 近Bohr速度的152Eu20+入射Au表面产生的X射线谱. , 2013, 62(6): 063202. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.063202 [12] 张小安, 梅策香, 赵永涛, 程锐, 王兴, 周贤明, 雷瑜, 孙渊博, 徐戈, 任洁茹. CSR上C6+脉冲束激发Au靶的X射线辐射. , 2013, 62(17): 173401. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.173401 [13] 章程, 邵涛, 牛铮, 张东东, 王珏, 严萍. 大气压尖板电极结构重复频率纳秒脉冲放电中X射线辐射特性研究. , 2012, 61(3): 035202. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.035202 [14] 刘鑫, 雷耀虎, 赵志刚, 郭金川, 牛憨笨. 硬X射线相位光栅的设计与研制. , 2010, 59(10): 6927-6932. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.6927 [15] 梁昌慧, 张小安, 李耀宗, 赵永涛, 肖国青. 129Xeq+激发Mo表面产生的X射线谱. , 2010, 59(9): 6059-6063. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.6059 [16] 张泊丽, 杨治虎, 杜树斌, 常宏伟, 薛迎丽, 宋张勇, 朱可欣, 田野. 20—50MeV O5+离子引起Au的L壳层X射线产生截面研究. , 2009, 58(9): 6113-6116. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.6113 [17] 陈 博, 朱佩平, 刘宜晋, 王寯越, 袁清习, 黄万霞, 明 海, 吴自玉. X射线光栅相位成像的理论和方法. , 2008, 57(3): 1576-1581. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.1576 [18] 杨治虎, 宋张勇, 崔 莹, 张红强, 阮芳芳, 邵剑雄, 杜 娟, 刘玉文, 朱可欣, 张小安, 邵曹杰, 卢荣春, 于得洋, 陈熙萌, 蔡晓红. Ar16+和Ar17+离子与Zr作用产生的X射线谱. , 2008, 57(2): 803-807. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.803 [19] 杨治虎, 宋张勇, 陈熙萌, 张小安, 张艳萍, 赵永涛, 崔 莹, 张红强, 徐 徐, 邵健雄, 于得洋, 蔡晓红. 高电荷态离子Arq+与不同金属靶作用产生的X射线. , 2006, 55(5): 2221-2227. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.2221 [20] 赵永涛, 肖国青, 张小安, 杨治虎, 陈熙萌, 李福利, 张艳萍, 张红强, 崔 莹, 绍剑雄, 徐 徐. 空心原子的K-x射线谱. , 2005, 54(1): 85-88. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.85
计量
- 文章访问数: 5732
- PDF下载量: 148
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
