-
会聚区是深海水声传播重要的物理现象, 对其准确建模和计算是深海远程水声探测与通信的基础. 但深海会聚区缺乏明确的数学描述, 特别是对于地球曲率所导致的系统误差, 目前主要采用近似计算与曲率修正相结合的方法, 尚无精确会聚区数学模型. 本文基于水声射线黎曼几何建模基础理论研究, 在弯曲球体流形上开展深海会聚区建模, 在分析总结会聚区物理特征的基础上, 给出深海会聚区黎曼几何描述, 得到深海会聚区位置、距离的分析形式和基于黎曼几何概念的计算方法, 为深海会聚区—这一重要的深海声学现象探索赋予黎曼几何学意义. 以Munk声速剖面为例, 对比分析深海会聚区在曲率修正和采用黎曼几何方法在球体流形上建模两种情形的时空分布, 验证了本文提出的深海会聚区黎曼几何模型的有效性, 结果显示近海面处的会聚区宽度随声传播呈现先变大后变小的规律, 最大约20 km, 最小约4 km.Convergence-zone (CZ) sound propagation is one of the most important hydro-acoustic phenomena in the deep ocean, which allows the acoustic signals with high intensity and low distortion to realize the long-range transmission. Accurate prediction and identification of CZ is of great significance in implementing remote detection or communication, but there is still no standard definition in the sense of mathematical physics for convergence zone. Especially for the issue of systematic error of computation introduced by the earth curvature, there is no exact propagation model. The curvature-correction methods always lead to the imprecision of the ray phase. In previous research work, we realized that the Riemannian geometric meaning of the caustics phenomena caused by ray convergence is that the caustic points are equivalent to the conjugate points, which form on geodesics with positive section curvature. In this work, we present a spherical layered acoustic ray propagation model for CZ based on the Riemannian geometric theory. With direct computation in the curved manifolds of the earth , a Riemannian geometric description of CZ is provided for the first time, on the basis of comprehensive analysis about its characteristics. And it shows that the mathematical expression of section curvature adds an additional item
${{\hat c(l){{\hat c}^\prime }(l)}}/{l}$ after considering the earth curvature, which reflects the influence of the earth curvature on the ray topology and CZ. By means of Jacobi field theory of Riemannian geometry, computational rule and method of the location and distance of CZ in deep water are proposed. Taking the typical Munk sound velocity profile for example, the new Riemannian geometric model of CZ is compared with the normal mode and curvature-correction method. Simulation and analysis show that the Riemannian geometric model of CZ given in this paper is a mathematical form naturally considering the earth curvature with theoretical accuracy, which lays more solid scientific foundations for the study of convergence zone. Moreover, we find that the location of CZ moves towards sound source when the earth curvature is considered, and the width of CZ near the sea surface first increases and then decreases with sound propagation proceeding. The maximum width is about 20 km and the minimum is about 4 km.-
Keywords:
- earth curvature /
- Jacobi field /
- sound propagation in deep ocean /
- ray model /
- convergence zone
[1] Jensen F B, Kuperman W A, Porter M B 2011 Schmidt H Computational Ocean Acoustics ( NewYork: Springer-Verlag) p125
[2] Hale F E 1961 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 33 456Google Scholar
[3] Urick R J 1965 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 38 348
[4] 朴胜春, 栗子洋, 王笑寒, 张明辉 2021 70 024301Google Scholar
Piao S C, Li Z Y, Wang X H, Zhang M H 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 024301Google Scholar
[5] 李文, 李整林 2016 中国科学: 物理学 力学 天文学 46 094303Google Scholar
Li W, Li Z L 2016 Sci. Sin. Phys. Mech. Astron. 46 094303Google Scholar
[6] 张仁和 1982 声学学报 7 75Google Scholar
Zhang R H 1982 Acta Acust 7 75Google Scholar
[7] 张仁和 1980 声学学报 1 28
Zhang R H 1980 Acta Acust 1 28
[8] Bongiovanni K P, Siegmann W L, Ko D S 1996 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100 3033Google Scholar
[9] Tolstoy I, Clay C S 1987 Ocean Acoustics: Theory and Experiment in Underwater Sound (New York: American Institute of Physics) p20
[10] Wu S L, Li Z L, Qin J X, Wang M Y, Li W 2022 J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 10 424Google Scholar
[11] 庄益夫, 张旭, 刘艳 2013 海洋通报 32 45Google Scholar
Zhuang Y F, Zhang X, Liu Y 2013 Mar. Sci. Bull. 32 45Google Scholar
[12] 张晶晶, 罗博 2017 声学与电子工程 2017 8
Zhang J J, Luo B 2017 Acoust. Electron. Eng. 2017 8
[13] Yang Y, Guo L H, Gong Z X 2020 Global Oceans 2020: Singapore–U. S. Gulf Coast Electr Network, October 5–30, 2021 p2021-10-08
[14] 龚敏, 肖金泉, 王孟新, 吴寅庚, 黄德华 1987 声学学报 12 417Google Scholar
Gong M, Xiao J Q, Wang M X, Wu Y G, Huang D H 1987 Acta Acust. 12 417Google Scholar
[15] Vadov R A 2005 Acoust. Phys. 51 265Google Scholar
[16] 徐传秀, 朴胜春, 张红星, 杨士莪, 张海刚, 周建波 2015 声学技术 34 79
Xu C X, Piao S C, Zhang H X, Yang S E, Zhang H G, Zhou J B 2015 Tech. Acoust. 34 79
[17] 毕思昭, 彭朝晖 2021 70 114303Google Scholar
Bi S Z, Peng Z H 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 114303Google Scholar
[18] Munk W H, O'Reilly W C, Reid J L 1988 J. Phys. Oceanogr. 18 1876Google Scholar
[19] Yan J, Kang K Y 1995 Appl. Acoust. 45 9Google Scholar
[20] Yan J 1999 Appl. Acoust. 57 163Google Scholar
[21] 郭肖晋, 马树青, 张理论, 蓝强, 黄创霞 2022 72 044302Google Scholar
[22] 陈维恒, 李兴校 2002 黎曼几何引论 (北京: 北京大学出版社 第267页
Chen W H, Li X X 2002 Introduction to Riemannian Geometry (Beijing: Peking University Press) p267 (in Chinese)
[23] 刘伯胜, 雷家煜 2010 水声学原理 (哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学出版社) 第77页
Liu B S, Lei J Y 2010 Principles of Underwater Acoustics (Harbin: Harbin Engineering University Press) p77 (in Chinese)
[24] Cheeger J, Ebin D G 2008 Comparison Theorems in Riemannian Geometry (Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society) p35
-
图 2 考虑地球曲率前后所选声线的截面曲率 (a) 660 s内50根声线的截面曲率; (b) 入射角
${\alpha _0}{\text{ = }}{0^\circ }$ 的声线形成第一个焦散点前的截面曲率Fig. 2. Section curvature before and after considering the earth curvature: (a) Section curvature of 50 sound lines in 660 s; (b) section curvature of sound line with elevation angle
${\alpha _0}{\text{ = }}{0^\circ }$ before forming the first caustic.表 1 考虑地球曲率前后Munk声速剖面下截面曲率对比
Table 1. Comparison of sectional curvature of Munk sound speed profile.
$ K \gt 0 $ $ K = 0 $ $ K \lt 0 $ $ {K_{\max }} $ 考虑地球曲率 $ \hat z \lt 4519 $ m $ \hat z = 4519 $ m $ \hat z \gt 4519 $ m 0.2878 不考虑地球曲率 $ z \lt 4510 $ m $ z = 4510 $ m $ z \gt 4510 $ m 0.2877 表 2 考虑地球曲率后会聚区向声源方向前移距离
Table 2. Distance of convergence zone moving forward towards sound source after considering the earth curvature.
第4个会聚区 第9个会聚区 第16个会聚区 上反转点会聚区前移距离/km 2.5 5.5 9.6 下反转点会聚区前移距离/km 2.3 5.4 9.7 -
[1] Jensen F B, Kuperman W A, Porter M B 2011 Schmidt H Computational Ocean Acoustics ( NewYork: Springer-Verlag) p125
[2] Hale F E 1961 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 33 456Google Scholar
[3] Urick R J 1965 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 38 348
[4] 朴胜春, 栗子洋, 王笑寒, 张明辉 2021 70 024301Google Scholar
Piao S C, Li Z Y, Wang X H, Zhang M H 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 024301Google Scholar
[5] 李文, 李整林 2016 中国科学: 物理学 力学 天文学 46 094303Google Scholar
Li W, Li Z L 2016 Sci. Sin. Phys. Mech. Astron. 46 094303Google Scholar
[6] 张仁和 1982 声学学报 7 75Google Scholar
Zhang R H 1982 Acta Acust 7 75Google Scholar
[7] 张仁和 1980 声学学报 1 28
Zhang R H 1980 Acta Acust 1 28
[8] Bongiovanni K P, Siegmann W L, Ko D S 1996 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100 3033Google Scholar
[9] Tolstoy I, Clay C S 1987 Ocean Acoustics: Theory and Experiment in Underwater Sound (New York: American Institute of Physics) p20
[10] Wu S L, Li Z L, Qin J X, Wang M Y, Li W 2022 J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 10 424Google Scholar
[11] 庄益夫, 张旭, 刘艳 2013 海洋通报 32 45Google Scholar
Zhuang Y F, Zhang X, Liu Y 2013 Mar. Sci. Bull. 32 45Google Scholar
[12] 张晶晶, 罗博 2017 声学与电子工程 2017 8
Zhang J J, Luo B 2017 Acoust. Electron. Eng. 2017 8
[13] Yang Y, Guo L H, Gong Z X 2020 Global Oceans 2020: Singapore–U. S. Gulf Coast Electr Network, October 5–30, 2021 p2021-10-08
[14] 龚敏, 肖金泉, 王孟新, 吴寅庚, 黄德华 1987 声学学报 12 417Google Scholar
Gong M, Xiao J Q, Wang M X, Wu Y G, Huang D H 1987 Acta Acust. 12 417Google Scholar
[15] Vadov R A 2005 Acoust. Phys. 51 265Google Scholar
[16] 徐传秀, 朴胜春, 张红星, 杨士莪, 张海刚, 周建波 2015 声学技术 34 79
Xu C X, Piao S C, Zhang H X, Yang S E, Zhang H G, Zhou J B 2015 Tech. Acoust. 34 79
[17] 毕思昭, 彭朝晖 2021 70 114303Google Scholar
Bi S Z, Peng Z H 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 114303Google Scholar
[18] Munk W H, O'Reilly W C, Reid J L 1988 J. Phys. Oceanogr. 18 1876Google Scholar
[19] Yan J, Kang K Y 1995 Appl. Acoust. 45 9Google Scholar
[20] Yan J 1999 Appl. Acoust. 57 163Google Scholar
[21] 郭肖晋, 马树青, 张理论, 蓝强, 黄创霞 2022 72 044302Google Scholar
[22] 陈维恒, 李兴校 2002 黎曼几何引论 (北京: 北京大学出版社 第267页
Chen W H, Li X X 2002 Introduction to Riemannian Geometry (Beijing: Peking University Press) p267 (in Chinese)
[23] 刘伯胜, 雷家煜 2010 水声学原理 (哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学出版社) 第77页
Liu B S, Lei J Y 2010 Principles of Underwater Acoustics (Harbin: Harbin Engineering University Press) p77 (in Chinese)
[24] Cheeger J, Ebin D G 2008 Comparison Theorems in Riemannian Geometry (Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society) p35
计量
- 文章访问数: 3571
- PDF下载量: 96
- 被引次数: 0