搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

混有协同自适应巡航控制车辆的异质交通流稳定性解析与基本图模型

秦严严 王昊 王炜 万千

引用本文:
Citation:

混有协同自适应巡航控制车辆的异质交通流稳定性解析与基本图模型

秦严严, 王昊, 王炜, 万千

Stability analysis and fundamental diagram of heterogeneous traffic flow mixed with cooperative adaptive cruise control vehicles

Qin Yan-Yan, Wang Hao, Wang Wei, Wan Qian
PDF
导出引用
  • 针对传统车辆和协同自适应巡航控制(cooperative adaptive cruise control,CACC)车辆构成的异质交通流,研究其稳定性与基本图模型.应用实车测试验证的CACC模型和智能驾驶员模型(intelligent driver model)分别作为CACC车辆和传统车辆的跟驰模型,建立异质流稳定性解析框架,研究不同平衡态速度、不同CACC车辆比例时的异质流稳定性.推导异质流基本图模型,并进行数值仿真实验.研究结果表明,在传统车辆稳定的速度范围,异质流处于稳定状态.在传统车辆不稳定的速度范围,CACC车辆比例增加以及平衡态速度远离9.618.6 m/s速度范围,均能够改善异质流的不稳定性.通行能力随着CACC车辆比例的增加而提高.此外,CACC模型的期望车间时距越大,异质流稳定域越大,但通行能力降低.因此,恒定车间时距CACC控制策略下的期望车间时距取值应权衡异质流稳定域和通行能力两个方面的影响.
    This paper is aimed at building a framework for string stability analysis of traffic flow mixed with different cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC) market penetration rates. In addition to the string stability, the fundamental diagram of the mixed flow is also taken into consideration for evaluating the effect of CACC vehicles on capacity. In order to describe the car-following dynamics of real CACC vehicles, the CACC model proposed by PATH is employed, which is validated by real experimental data. The intelligent driver model (IDM) is used as a surrogate car-following model for traditional manual driven vehicles. Based on the guidelines proposed by Ward[Ward J A 2009 Ph. D. Dissertation (Bristol:University of Bristol)], a framework is developed for the analytical investigation of heterogeneous traffic flow string stability. The framework presented considers the instability condition of traffic flow as a linear function of CACC market penetration rate. Following the framework, the string stabilities of the mixed traffic flow under different CACC market penetration rates and equilibrium velocities are analyzed. For fundamental diagram of the heterogeneous traffic flow, the equilibrium velocity-spacing functions of manual vehicles and CACC vehicles are obtained respectively based on car-following model. Then, the fundamental diagram of the density-velocity relationship of the heterogeneous traffic flow is derived based on the definition of traffic flow density. In addition, the theoretical fundamental diagram is plotted to show the property of traffic throughput. The numerical simulations are also carried out in order to investigate the effect of CACC vehicle on the characteristics of fundamental diagram. Besides, sensitivity analyses on CACC desired time gap are conducted for both string stability and fundamental diagram. Analytical studies and simulation results are as follows. 1) The heterogeneous traffic flow is stable for different equilibrium velocities and CACC market penetration rates, if manual driven vehicles are stable. Otherwise, the instability of traditional traffic flow is improved gradually with the increase of the CACC market penetration rate. Additionally, the stability will become better when equilibrium velocity is away from the velocity range of 9.6-18.6 m/s. 2) Because CACC vehicles can travel at free-flow speed in a relatively small headway, CACC vehicles can improve the capacity of heterogeneous traffic flow. 3) The results of sensitivity analysis indicate that with the increase of the CACC desired time gap, the stable region of heterogeneous traffic flow increases. However, the capacity of the fundamental diagram drops. Therefore, the value of the desired time gap should be determined with considering the effects of the two aspects on the heterogeneous traffic flow. It is noted that the CACC model used in this paper is based on the current state-of-the-art real CACC vehicle experiments. In the future, more experimental observations will yield new CACC models. However, the framework presented in this paper can still be used for the analytical investigation of string stability of the heterogeneous traffic flow at that time.
      通信作者: 王昊, haowang@seu.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号:51478113,51508122)、东南大学优秀青年教师教学科研资助项目(批准号:2242015R30028)和广西科技攻关计划(批准号:桂科攻15248002-10)资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Wang Hao, haowang@seu.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51478113, 51508122), the Foundation for Excellent Young Scientists of Southeast University, China (Grant No. 2242015R30028), and the Guangxi Science and Technology Project, China (Grant No. 15248002-10).
    [1]

    Tang T Q, Yi Z Y, Lin Q F 2017 Physica A 469 200

    [2]

    Ranjitkar P, Nakatsuji T, Kawamura A 2005 Transp. Res. Rec. 1934 22

    [3]

    Jiang R, Hu M B, Zhang H M, Gao Z Y, Jia B, Wu Q S 2015 Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 80 338

    [4]

    Pueboobpaphan R, van Arem B 2010 Transp. Res. Rec. 2189 89

    [5]

    Kerner B S 2016 Physica A 450 700

    [6]

    Naus G J L, Vugts R P A, Ploeg J, Molengraft M J G, Steinbuch M 2010 IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 59 4268

    [7]

    Milans V, Shladover S E, Spring J, Nowakowski C, Kawazoe H, Nakamura M 2014 IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 15 296

    [8]

    Milans V, Villagr J, Prez J, Gonzlez C 2012 IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 59 620

    [9]

    Jin I G, Orosz G 2014 Transp. Res. C 46 46

    [10]

    Tang T Q, Chen L, Yang S C, Shang H Y 2015 Physica A 430 148

    [11]

    Ge H X, Cui Y, Zhu K Q, Cheng R J 2015 Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 22 903

    [12]

    Ge H X, Zheng P J, Wang W, Cheng R J 2015 Physica A 433 274

    [13]

    Tang T Q, Li J G, Yang S C, Shang H Y 2015 Physica A 419 293

    [14]

    Sau J, Monteil J, Billot R, Faouzi N E E 2014 Transp. B: Transp. Dyn. 2 60

    [15]

    Wang M, Daamen W, Hoogendoorn S P, van Arem B 2016 IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 17 1459

    [16]

    van Arem B, van Driel C J G, Visser R 2006 IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 7 429

    [17]

    Tang T Q, Xu K W, Yang S C, Ding C 2016 Physica A 441 221

    [18]

    Jerath K, Brennan S N 2012 IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 13 1782

    [19]

    Tang T Q, Yu Q, Yang S C, Ding C 2015 Mod. Phys. Lett. B 29 1550157

    [20]

    Milans V, Shladover S E 2014 Transp. Res. C 48 285

    [21]

    Ge H X, Cheng R J, Li Z P 2008 Physica A 387 5239

    [22]

    Yu S, Shi Z 2015 Physica A 428 206

    [23]

    Hua X D, Wang W, Wang H 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 010502 (in Chinese) [华雪东, 王炜, 王昊 2016 65 010502]

    [24]

    Hua X D, Wang W, Wang H 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 084503 (in Chinese) [华雪东, 王炜, 王昊 2016 65 084503]

    [25]

    Ward J A 2009 Ph. D. Dissertation (Bristol: University of Bristol)

    [26]

    Treiber M, Hennecke A, Helbing D 2000 Phys. Rev. E 62 1805

    [27]

    Kesting A, Treiber M, Schnhof M, Helbing D 2008 Transp. Res. C 16 668

    [28]

    Shladover S, Su D, Lu X Y 2012 Transp. Res. Rec. 2324 63

    [29]

    Ma X, Zheng W F, Jiang B S, Zhang J Y 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 108902

    [30]

    Wilson R E 2008 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 366 2017

    [31]

    Zheng Y Z, Cheng R J, Lu Z M, Ge H X 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 060506

    [32]

    Zheng W F, Zhang J Y 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 058902

    [33]

    Ge H X, Meng X P, Zhu K Q, Cheng R J 2014 Chin. Phys. Lett. 31 080505

    [34]

    Tang T Q, Li C Y, Huang H J 2010 Phys. Lett. A 374 3951

    [35]

    Liu Y J, Zhang H L, He L 2012 Chin. Phys. Lett. 29 104502

    [36]

    Oh S, Yeo H 2012 Transp. Res. Rec. 2286 111

  • [1]

    Tang T Q, Yi Z Y, Lin Q F 2017 Physica A 469 200

    [2]

    Ranjitkar P, Nakatsuji T, Kawamura A 2005 Transp. Res. Rec. 1934 22

    [3]

    Jiang R, Hu M B, Zhang H M, Gao Z Y, Jia B, Wu Q S 2015 Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 80 338

    [4]

    Pueboobpaphan R, van Arem B 2010 Transp. Res. Rec. 2189 89

    [5]

    Kerner B S 2016 Physica A 450 700

    [6]

    Naus G J L, Vugts R P A, Ploeg J, Molengraft M J G, Steinbuch M 2010 IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 59 4268

    [7]

    Milans V, Shladover S E, Spring J, Nowakowski C, Kawazoe H, Nakamura M 2014 IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 15 296

    [8]

    Milans V, Villagr J, Prez J, Gonzlez C 2012 IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 59 620

    [9]

    Jin I G, Orosz G 2014 Transp. Res. C 46 46

    [10]

    Tang T Q, Chen L, Yang S C, Shang H Y 2015 Physica A 430 148

    [11]

    Ge H X, Cui Y, Zhu K Q, Cheng R J 2015 Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 22 903

    [12]

    Ge H X, Zheng P J, Wang W, Cheng R J 2015 Physica A 433 274

    [13]

    Tang T Q, Li J G, Yang S C, Shang H Y 2015 Physica A 419 293

    [14]

    Sau J, Monteil J, Billot R, Faouzi N E E 2014 Transp. B: Transp. Dyn. 2 60

    [15]

    Wang M, Daamen W, Hoogendoorn S P, van Arem B 2016 IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 17 1459

    [16]

    van Arem B, van Driel C J G, Visser R 2006 IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 7 429

    [17]

    Tang T Q, Xu K W, Yang S C, Ding C 2016 Physica A 441 221

    [18]

    Jerath K, Brennan S N 2012 IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 13 1782

    [19]

    Tang T Q, Yu Q, Yang S C, Ding C 2015 Mod. Phys. Lett. B 29 1550157

    [20]

    Milans V, Shladover S E 2014 Transp. Res. C 48 285

    [21]

    Ge H X, Cheng R J, Li Z P 2008 Physica A 387 5239

    [22]

    Yu S, Shi Z 2015 Physica A 428 206

    [23]

    Hua X D, Wang W, Wang H 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 010502 (in Chinese) [华雪东, 王炜, 王昊 2016 65 010502]

    [24]

    Hua X D, Wang W, Wang H 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 084503 (in Chinese) [华雪东, 王炜, 王昊 2016 65 084503]

    [25]

    Ward J A 2009 Ph. D. Dissertation (Bristol: University of Bristol)

    [26]

    Treiber M, Hennecke A, Helbing D 2000 Phys. Rev. E 62 1805

    [27]

    Kesting A, Treiber M, Schnhof M, Helbing D 2008 Transp. Res. C 16 668

    [28]

    Shladover S, Su D, Lu X Y 2012 Transp. Res. Rec. 2324 63

    [29]

    Ma X, Zheng W F, Jiang B S, Zhang J Y 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 108902

    [30]

    Wilson R E 2008 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 366 2017

    [31]

    Zheng Y Z, Cheng R J, Lu Z M, Ge H X 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 060506

    [32]

    Zheng W F, Zhang J Y 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 058902

    [33]

    Ge H X, Meng X P, Zhu K Q, Cheng R J 2014 Chin. Phys. Lett. 31 080505

    [34]

    Tang T Q, Li C Y, Huang H J 2010 Phys. Lett. A 374 3951

    [35]

    Liu Y J, Zhang H L, He L 2012 Chin. Phys. Lett. 29 104502

    [36]

    Oh S, Yeo H 2012 Transp. Res. Rec. 2286 111

  • [1] 张琦, 渠静. 基于前摄效应的不耐烦行为建模与双向行人流动态.  , 2022, 71(7): 070502. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211537
    [2] 段亮, 刘冲, 赵立臣, 杨战营. 基本非线性波与调制不稳定性的精确对应.  , 2020, 69(1): 010501. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191385
    [3] 刘强, 罗振兵, 邓雄, 杨升科, 蒋浩. 合成冷/热射流控制超声速边界层流动稳定性.  , 2017, 66(23): 234701. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.234701
    [4] 华雪东, 王炜, 王昊. 考虑自适应巡航车辆影响的上匝道系统混合交通流模型.  , 2016, 65(8): 084503. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.084503
    [5] 朱霖河, 赵洪涌. 时滞惯性神经网络的稳定性和分岔控制.  , 2014, 63(9): 090203. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.090203
    [6] 曾友志, 张宁. 最相邻后车综合信息对交通流不稳定性的影响分析.  , 2014, 63(21): 218901. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.218901
    [7] 胡建兵, 赵灵冬. 分数阶系统稳定性理论与控制研究.  , 2013, 62(24): 240504. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.240504
    [8] 王静, 冯露, 郝毅, 赵洋, 陈振飞. 异质外延生长中应变对圆形岛形貌稳定性的影响.  , 2013, 62(23): 238102. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.238102
    [9] 鲁延玲, 蒋国平, 宋玉蓉. 自适应网络中病毒传播的稳定性和分岔行为研究.  , 2013, 62(13): 130202. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.130202
    [10] 胡乃红, 周宇飞, 陈军宁. 单相SPWM逆变器快标分叉控制及其稳定性分析.  , 2012, 61(13): 130504. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.130504
    [11] 曹建民, 贺威, 黄思文, 张旭琳. pMOS器件直流应力负偏置温度不稳定性效应随器件基本参数变化的分析.  , 2012, 61(21): 217305. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.217305
    [12] 刘诗序, 关宏志, 严海. 网络交通流动态演化的混沌现象及其控制.  , 2012, 61(9): 090506. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.090506
    [13] 张立东, 贾磊, 朱文兴. 弯道交通流跟驰建模与稳定性分析.  , 2012, 61(7): 074501. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.074501
    [14] 贾宁, 马寿峰. 最优速度模型与元胞自动机模型的比较研究.  , 2010, 59(2): 832-841. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.832
    [15] 滕亚帆, 高自友, 贾 斌, 李 峰. 信号灯控制下的主道双车道入匝道系统交通流特性研究.  , 2008, 57(3): 1365-1374. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.1365
    [16] 李 伟, 徐 伟, 赵俊锋, 靳艳飞. 耦合Duffing-van der Pol系统的随机稳定性及控制.  , 2005, 54(12): 5559-5565. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.5559
    [17] 陈燕红, 薛 郁. 随机延迟概率对交通流的影响.  , 2004, 53(12): 4145-4150. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.4145
    [18] 谭惠丽, 黄乒花, 李华兵, 刘慕仁, 孔令江. 交通灯控制下主干道的交通流研究.  , 2003, 52(5): 1127-1131. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.1127
    [19] 李智, 韩崇昭. 一类含参数不确定性混沌系统的自适应控制.  , 2001, 50(5): 847-850. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.847
    [20] 海文华, 段宜武, 朱熙文, 施磊, 罗学立, 何春山. 控制离子云混沌运动中的不稳定性.  , 1997, 46(11): 2117-2123. doi: 10.7498/aps.46.2117
计量
  • 文章访问数:  8782
  • PDF下载量:  563
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2016-09-07
  • 修回日期:  2016-12-27
  • 刊出日期:  2017-05-05

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map