-
Optical frequency combs serve as a core technology for optical clocks and frequency transfer, and their linewidth directly impacts the precision of frequency measurements. Consequently, linewidth compression has been a major research focus in the field of frequency combs. The noise of laser has a significant impact on the performance of the carrier-envelope offset frequency (fceo), and different mode-locking mechanisms of the laser result in distinct noise properties. Additionally, intensity fluctuations in the pump source also affect the phase noise of the laser.
In this work, a polarization-maintaining figure-9 mode-locked laser (F9L) is established by incorporating dispersion management technology, with the repetition rate continuously tunable in the range of 197.8-200.65 MHz. Compared with a previously developed nonlinear polarization rotation (NPR) mode-locked laser of the same repetition rate, the F9L exhibited superior phase noise performance. Within the 1 Hz-1 MHz integration range, the phase noise of NPR and F9L is 222.4 ps and 18.5 ps, respectively. Based on the F9L, an all-polarization-maintaining optical frequency comb system was built. The spatial light from the laser is coupled into the fiber through a collimator, and the average output power after a bidirectional pumping amplifier reaches 395 mW. Amplifier-output pigtail fiber length was controlled to manipulate the evolution of higher-order solitons. When the output fiber length is trimmed to 41 cm, the pulse width is measured to be 78 fs after Gaussian fitting. The pulsed light was launched into a section of highly nonlinear fiber, generating a supercontinuum spectrum that fully covers the 1000-2000 nm. A carrier-envelope offset frequency (fceo) signal with a signal-to-noise ratio of 47 dB was successfully obtained with a common path f-2f interferometer.
Under driving by the same LDC8020 pump source, the free-running fceo linewidths of the NPR and F9L mode-locked lasers were measured as 221.5 kHz and 11.4 kHz, respectively. Additionally, the effects of pump current noise and the angle of the 1/8 waveplate inside the F9L cavity on the fceo linewidth were systematically studied. For the pump current noise analysis, two types of current sources with different noise levels, namely Thorlabs LDC8020 (20 μA RMS) and Thorlabs CLD1015 (10 μA RMS), were employed. When the F9L was driven by the lower-noise CLD1015 current source, the free-running fceo linewidth was further narrowed to 6.6 kHz, and the multi-peak structure in the spectrum was eliminated, demonstrating the positive role of optimizing pump current noise in linewidth compression. Regarding the waveplate angle, experiments were conducted at angles of 45°, 55°, and 65°. It was found that an appropriate waveplate angle (55° in this case) balanced the modulation depth and intracavity loss, effectively suppressing amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) quantum noise and minimizing phase noise, thereby achieving the optimal fceo linewidth. Finally, the standard frequency deviations of the repetition rate and fceo were 0.376 mHz and 0.263 mHz, respectively, under two consecutive days of locking.-
Keywords:
- laser /
- Nonlinear fiber optics /
- optical frequency comb /
- ultrafast laser
-
[1] Ludlow A D, Boyd M M, Ye J, Peik E, Schmidt P O 2015 Rev. Mod. Phys. 87 637
[2] Prehn A, Glöckner R, Rempe G, Zeppenfeld M 2017 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 88 033101
[3] Zhang P, Zhang Y Y, Li M K, Rao B J, Yan L L, Chen F X, Jiang H F, Zhang S G 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 054210
[4] Foltynowicz A, Masłowski P, Ban T, Adler F, Cossel K C, Briles T C, Ye J 2011 Faraday Discuss. 150 23
[5] Leopardi H, Davila-Rodriguez J, Quinlan F, Olson J, Sherman J A, Diddams S A, Fortier T M 2017 Optica 4 879
[6] Yasui T, Yokoyama S, Inaba H, Minoshima K, Nagatsuma T, Araki T 2010 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 17 191
[7] Lee C, Chu S T, Little B E, Bland-Hawthorn J, Leon-Saval S 2012 Opt. Express 20 16671
[8] Pupeza I, Zhang C, Högner M, Ye J 2021 Nat. Photonics 15 175
[9] Kanno A, Sekine N, Uzawa Y, Hosako I, Kawanishi T 2015 European Microwave Conference (EuMC) Paris, France, September 7—10, 2015 p558
[10] Sinclair L C, Deschênes J D, Sonderhouse L, Swann W C, Khader I H, Baumann E, Newbury N R, Coddington I 2015 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 86 081301
[11] Baumann E, Giorgetta F R, Nicholson J W, Swann W C, Coddington I, Newbury N R 2009 Opt. Lett. 34 638
[12] Li X, Reber M A, Corder C, Chen Y, Zhao P, Allison T K 2016 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87 093114
[13] Wang T, Yang Y D, Hao Y Z, Zhang Z N, Sh, Y, Chen Y L, Xiao J L, Huang Y Z 2023 Opt. Express 31 12200
[14] Endo M, Shoji T D, Schibli T R 2018 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 24 1
[15] Paschotta R, Schlatter A, Zeller S C, Telle H R, Keller U 2006 Appl. Phys. B 82 265
[16] Raabe N, Feng T L, Mero M, Tian H C, Song Y J, Hänsel W, Holzwarth R, Sell A, Zach A, Steinmeyer G 2017 Opt. Lett. 42 1068
[17] Zhang Y Y, Fan S T, Yan L L, Zhang L, Zhang X F, Guo W G, Zhang S G, Jiang H F 2017 Opt. Express 25 21719
[18] Xiong S P, Luo D P, Liu Y, Wang W C, Deng Z J, Tang Z Q, Xie G H, Zhou L, Zuo Z, Gu C G, Li W X 2022 Opt. Express 31 514
[19] Kim J W, Song Y J 2016 Adv. Opt. Photonics 8 465
[20] Liu G Y, Jiang X G, Wang A M, Chang G Q, Kaertner F, Zhang Z G 2018 Opt. Express 26 26003
[21] Ren B, Li C, Wang T, Guo K, Zhou P 2022 Opt. Express 30 26464
[22] Cao S Y, Han Y, Ding Y J, Lin B K, Fang Z J 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 074207
[23] Cao S Y, Meng F, Lin B K, Fang Z J, Li T C 2012 Chin. Phys. B 61 134205 (in Chinese) [曹士英，孟非，林百科，方占军，李天初 2012 中国物理B 61 134205]
[24] Liao R Y, Chao M, Song Y J, Demircan A, Steinmeyer G 2020 Phys. Rev. A 102 013506
Metrics
- Abstract views: 31
- PDF Downloads: 1
- Cited By: 0
下载:
