Search

Article

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Effect of magnetic field on stability in mushy layer during binary alloy solidification

Fan Hai-Long Chen Ming-Wen

Citation:

Effect of magnetic field on stability in mushy layer during binary alloy solidification

Fan Hai-Long, Chen Ming-Wen
cstr: 32037.14.aps.70.20201748
Article Text (iFLYTEK Translation)
PDF
HTML
Get Citation
  • During directional solidification of binary alloy mixtures, instability in the solid/liquid interface appears due to constitutional undercooling. As a result of this instability, a reactive porous medium, namely mushy layer, is formed, and it separates the liquid phase from the solid phase completely. The intrinsic structure of the mushy layer is of fine-scale dendritic crystal that shelters solute in the interstitial fluid. In a gravitational field, the rejection of lighter solute components from an advancing solidification front brings about unstable density gradient. Ensuing convective motions in the mush are driven by a density difference. The convection can change the solid matrix of the mushy layer. Hence, the dynamic response of the mushy layer is driven by interaction among heat transfer, solute transport and convection. As a contactless control tool, external magnetic field can change the heat and solute transport, which has a significant effect on the phase change process. Therefore, when magnetic field, thermal diffusion, solute transport and buoyancy convection are considered simultaneously in the phase transformation process, the mechanism of mushy region will become more complex and interesting. In this paper, the effect of external magnetic field on the stability of mushy layer during binary alloy solidification is studied. The coupling effects of magnetic field, temperature field, concentration field and convection are considered in the model. Including the direct mode and the oscillation mode, the resulting dispersion relation reveals the influence of magnetic field on the stability of mushy layer through linear stability analysis. It is found that the Lorentz force can reduce the instability effect which is caused by buoyancy convection. In the oscillation mode, an external magnetic field brings about a stabilizing effect on the mushy layer, but in the direct mode, the effect of external magnetic field on stability of the mushy layer is uncertain. In conclusion, the finding in this paper provides an important theoretical reference for improving products quality by applying an external magnetic field in the metals processing industry.
      Corresponding author: Chen Ming-Wen, chenmw@ustb.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11401021, 51971031)
    [1]

    Kurz W, Fisher D J 1989 Fundamentals of Solidification (Aedermannsdorf: Enfield Publishing & Distribution Company) pp46−55

    [2]

    Amberg G, Homsy G M 1993 J. Fluid Mech. 252 79Google Scholar

    [3]

    Mullins W W, Sekerka R F 1964 J. Appl. Phys. 35 444Google Scholar

    [4]

    Anderson D M, Guba P 2020 Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 52 93Google Scholar

    [5]

    Anderson D M, Worster M G 1996 J. Fluid Mech. 307 245Google Scholar

    [6]

    Guba P, Anderson D M 2014 J. Fluid Mech. 760 634Google Scholar

    [7]

    Ganapathysubramanian B, Zabaras N 2005 Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 48 4174Google Scholar

    [8]

    Tian X Y, Zou F, Li B W, He J C 2010 Metall. Mater. Trans. B 40 112

    [9]

    Cukierski K, Thomas B G 2008 Metall. Mater. Trans. B 39 94Google Scholar

    [10]

    Thomas B G, Zhang L 2001 ISIJ Int. 41 1181Google Scholar

    [11]

    Mofatt H K 1965 J. Fluid Mech. 22 521Google Scholar

    [12]

    Saluja N, Ilegbusi O J, Szekely J 1990 J. Appl. Phys. 68 5845Google Scholar

    [13]

    Kumar A, Dutta P 2005 Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 48 3674Google Scholar

    [14]

    Riahi D N 2000 J. Cryst. Growth 216 501Google Scholar

    [15]

    Muddamallappa M S, Bhatta D, Riahi D N 2009 Transport Porous Med. 79 301Google Scholar

    [16]

    Kao A, Cai B, Lee P D, Pericleous K 2017 J. Cryst. Growth 457 270Google Scholar

    [17]

    Sarkar S, Ganguly S, Dutta P 2017 Appl. Math. Model 48 233Google Scholar

    [18]

    Anderson D M 2003 J. Fluid Mech. 483 165Google Scholar

    [19]

    Anderson D M, Mcfadden G B, Coriell S R, Murray B T 2010 J. Fluid Mech. 647 309Google Scholar

    [20]

    Guba P, Anderson D M 2017 J. Fluid Mech. 825 853Google Scholar

    [21]

    Moreau R J 2013 Magnetohydrodynamics (Vol. 3) (Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media) pp4−12

  • 图 1  以恒定速度${V^*}$凝固的糊状层示意图

    Figure 1.  Schematic representation of mushy layer system, which advancing upwards with a constant solidification speed ${V^*}$.

    图 2  直接模式的中性稳定性曲线和不稳定区域(阴影部分)示意图 (a)情况1; (b)情况2; (c)情况3; (d)情况4

    Figure 2.  Schematic representation of the neutral-stability curves and the regions of instability (shaded) for direct modes: (a) Situation 1; (b) situation 2; (c) situation 3; (d) situation 4.

    图 3  振荡模式的中性稳定性曲线示意图(振荡模式的不稳定性区域为图中实线(黑色)和点划线(红色)之间的部分) (a)情况1; (b)情况2; (c)情况3; (d)情况4

    Figure 3.  Schematic representation of the neutral-stability curves for the oscillatory modes: (a) Situation 1; (b) situation 2; (c) situation 3; (d) situation 4. The instability region of oscillation mode is the part between solid line (black) and dashed line (red).

    Baidu
  • [1]

    Kurz W, Fisher D J 1989 Fundamentals of Solidification (Aedermannsdorf: Enfield Publishing & Distribution Company) pp46−55

    [2]

    Amberg G, Homsy G M 1993 J. Fluid Mech. 252 79Google Scholar

    [3]

    Mullins W W, Sekerka R F 1964 J. Appl. Phys. 35 444Google Scholar

    [4]

    Anderson D M, Guba P 2020 Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 52 93Google Scholar

    [5]

    Anderson D M, Worster M G 1996 J. Fluid Mech. 307 245Google Scholar

    [6]

    Guba P, Anderson D M 2014 J. Fluid Mech. 760 634Google Scholar

    [7]

    Ganapathysubramanian B, Zabaras N 2005 Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 48 4174Google Scholar

    [8]

    Tian X Y, Zou F, Li B W, He J C 2010 Metall. Mater. Trans. B 40 112

    [9]

    Cukierski K, Thomas B G 2008 Metall. Mater. Trans. B 39 94Google Scholar

    [10]

    Thomas B G, Zhang L 2001 ISIJ Int. 41 1181Google Scholar

    [11]

    Mofatt H K 1965 J. Fluid Mech. 22 521Google Scholar

    [12]

    Saluja N, Ilegbusi O J, Szekely J 1990 J. Appl. Phys. 68 5845Google Scholar

    [13]

    Kumar A, Dutta P 2005 Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 48 3674Google Scholar

    [14]

    Riahi D N 2000 J. Cryst. Growth 216 501Google Scholar

    [15]

    Muddamallappa M S, Bhatta D, Riahi D N 2009 Transport Porous Med. 79 301Google Scholar

    [16]

    Kao A, Cai B, Lee P D, Pericleous K 2017 J. Cryst. Growth 457 270Google Scholar

    [17]

    Sarkar S, Ganguly S, Dutta P 2017 Appl. Math. Model 48 233Google Scholar

    [18]

    Anderson D M 2003 J. Fluid Mech. 483 165Google Scholar

    [19]

    Anderson D M, Mcfadden G B, Coriell S R, Murray B T 2010 J. Fluid Mech. 647 309Google Scholar

    [20]

    Guba P, Anderson D M 2017 J. Fluid Mech. 825 853Google Scholar

    [21]

    Moreau R J 2013 Magnetohydrodynamics (Vol. 3) (Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media) pp4−12

Metrics
  • Abstract views:  7017
  • PDF Downloads:  57
  • Cited By: 0
Publishing process
  • Received Date:  21 October 2020
  • Accepted Date:  16 November 2020
  • Available Online:  12 March 2021
  • Published Online:  20 March 2021
  • /

    返回文章
    返回
    Baidu
    map