Reference-frame-independent measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution under reference frame fluctuation

Gu Wen-Yuan; Zhao Shang-Hong; Dong Chen; Wang Xing-Yu; Yang Ding

doi:10.7498/aps.68.20191364

Abstract

Reference-frame-independent measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution is adopted to avoid aligning the reference frames in realistic setup, which can guarantee the system security against the slow drift of reference frame. However, the relative motion of reference frame including deviation and fluctuation can influence the performance of reference-frame-independent measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution in practical experimental demonstration. In this paper, taking finite effect into consideration, the performance of reference-frame-independent measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with biased bases under reference frame deviation and fluctuation is presented to evaluate the effect of the relative motion of reference frame on our scheme, which makes the analysis conform to reality. Our simulation results imply that the key rates fluctuate periodically with the reference frame rotating, while declining with the reference frame fluctuation increasing.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

1.
Information and Navigation College, Air Force Engineering University, Xi’an 710077, China
2.
State Key Laboratory of Cryptology, Beijing 100878, China
3.
College of Information and Communication, National University of Defense and Technology, Xi’an 710006, China

Corresponding author: Dong Chen, dongchengfkd@163.com

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11704412), the Open Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Cryptography Science and Technology, China (Grant No. MMKFKT201823), the Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi Province, China (Grant No. 2019ZDLGY09-01), and the Key Development Program of the National University of Defense Technology, China (Grant No. zk17-02-09)

FullText HTML

References

[1]	Shannon C E 1949 Bell Sys. Tech. J. 28 656 Google Scholar
[2]	Ekert A K 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 661 Google Scholar
[3]	Lo H K, Ma X, Chen K 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 230504 Google Scholar
[4]	Stucki D, Walenta N, Vannel F, Thew R T, Gisin N, Zbinden H, Gray S, Towery C R, Ten S 2009 New J. Phys. 11 075003 Google Scholar
[5]	Wang S, Chen W, Guo J F, Yin Z Q, Li H W, Zhou Z, Guo G C, Han Z F 2012 Opt. Lett. 37 1008 Google Scholar
[6]	Wang S, Yin Z Q, Chen W, He D Y, Song X T, Li H W, Zhang L J, Zhou Z, Guo G C, Han Z F 2015 Nat. Photon. 9 832 Google Scholar
[7]	Tang G Z, Sun S H, Li C Y 2019 Chin. Phys. Lett. 36 070301 Google Scholar
[8]	Wang X Y, Zhao S H, Dong C, Zhu Z D, Gu W Y 2019 Quantum Inf. Process. 18 304 Google Scholar
[9]	Liu H W, Qu W X, Dou T Q, Wang J P, Zhang Y, Ma H Q 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 100309 Google Scholar
[10]	Liu K, Li J, Zhu J R, Zhang C M, Wang Q 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 120302 Google Scholar
[11]	Gan Y H, Wang Y, Bao W S, He R S, Zhou C, Jiang M S 2019 Chin. Phys. Lett. 36 040301 Google Scholar
[12]	Du G H, Li H W, Wang Y, Bao W S 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 090301 Google Scholar
[13]	Brassard G, Lütkenhaus N, Mor T, Sanders B C 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 1330 Google Scholar
[14]	陈艳辉, 王金东, 杜聪 2019 68 130301 Google Scholar Chen Y H, Wang J D, Du C 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 130301 Google Scholar
[15]	沈咏, 邹宏新 2010 59 1473 Google Scholar Shen Y, Zou Y X 2010 Acta Phys. Sin. 59 1473 Google Scholar
[16]	Huang J Z, Yin Z Q, Wang S, Li H W, Chen W, Han Z F 2012 Eur. Phys. J. D 66 159 Google Scholar
[17]	Lo H K, Curty M, Qi B 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 130503 Google Scholar
[18]	Silva T F D, Vitoreti D, Xavier G B, Temporão G P, von der Weid J P 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 052303 Google Scholar
[19]	Tang Z Y, Liao Z F, Xu F H, Qi B, Qian L, Lo H K 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 190503 Google Scholar
[20]	Yin H L, Chen T Y, Yu Z W, Liu H, You L X, Zhou Y H, Chen S J, Mao Y Q, Huang M Q, Zhang W J, Chen H, Li M J, Nolan D, Zhou F, Jiang X, Wang Z, Zhang Q, Wang X B, Pan J W 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 190501 Google Scholar
[21]	Yin Z Q, Wang S, Chen W, Li H W, Guo G C, Han Z F 2014 Quantum Inf. Process. 13 1237 Google Scholar
[22]	Wang C, Yin Z Q, Wang S, Chen W, Han Z F 2017 Optica 4 1016 Google Scholar
[23]	Zhang C M, Zhu J R, Wang Q 2017 Phys. Rev. A 95 032309 Google Scholar
[24]	Liu H W, Wang J P, Ma H Q, Sun S H 2018 Optica 5 902 Google Scholar
[25]	Zhang H, Zhang C H, Zhang C M, Guo G C, Wang Q 2019 Quantum Inform. Process. 18 313 Google Scholar
[26]	Xue Q Y, Jiao R Z 2019 JOSA B 36 476 Google Scholar
[27]	Pramanik T, Park B K, Cho Y, Han S W, Kim Y S, Moon S 2017 Phys. Lett. A 381 2497 Google Scholar
[28]	Yoon J, Pramanik T, Park B K, Han S W, Kim S, Kim Y S, Moon S 2019 Opt. Commun. 441 64 Google Scholar
[29]	Zhang C M, Zhang J R, Wang Q 2017 J. Lightwave Technol. 35 4574 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 Alice和Bob的三组共轭基的实际位置关系图

Figure 1. Relationship among reference frames of Alice and Bob.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 参考系偏移和波动下有偏基RFI-MDI-QKD协议的C值　(a) 参数C与偏移角$\theta $的关系图; (b) 参数C与波动角$\delta $的关系图

Figure 2. Parameter C of RFI-MDI-QKD with biased bases under reference frame deviation and fluctuation: (a) The parameter C vs. the reference frame deviation $\theta $; (b) the parameter C vs. the reference frame fluctuation $\delta $.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 有偏基RFI-MDI-QKD协议密钥率R与偏移角$\theta $、波动角$\delta $的关系图

Figure 3. Secure key rates R of RFI-MDI-QKD with biased bases in regard to the reference frame deviation $\theta $ and fluctuation $\delta $.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 参考系偏移和波动下有偏基RFI-MDI-QKD协议密钥率变化图　(a) 密钥率R与偏移角$\theta $的关系图; (b) 协议密钥率R与波动角$\delta $的关系图

Figure 4. Secure key rates of RFI-MDI-QKD with biased bases under reference frame deviation and fluctuation: (a) The secure key rates R vs. the reference frame deviation $\theta $; (b) the secure key rates R vs. the reference frame fluctuation $\delta $.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

表 1 有偏基RFI-MDI-QKD协议的主要仿真参数

Table 1. List of parameters of RFI-MDI-QKD with biased bases in the simulation.

${Y_0}$ e_d ${e_0}$ f η_d

$1.2 \times {10^{-6}}$ 0.005 0.5 1.16 0.125

DownLoad: CSV

map

[1]	Shannon C E 1949 Bell Sys. Tech. J. 28 656 Google Scholar
[2]	Ekert A K 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 661 Google Scholar
[3]	Lo H K, Ma X, Chen K 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 230504 Google Scholar
[4]	Stucki D, Walenta N, Vannel F, Thew R T, Gisin N, Zbinden H, Gray S, Towery C R, Ten S 2009 New J. Phys. 11 075003 Google Scholar
[5]	Wang S, Chen W, Guo J F, Yin Z Q, Li H W, Zhou Z, Guo G C, Han Z F 2012 Opt. Lett. 37 1008 Google Scholar
[6]	Wang S, Yin Z Q, Chen W, He D Y, Song X T, Li H W, Zhang L J, Zhou Z, Guo G C, Han Z F 2015 Nat. Photon. 9 832 Google Scholar
[7]	Tang G Z, Sun S H, Li C Y 2019 Chin. Phys. Lett. 36 070301 Google Scholar
[8]	Wang X Y, Zhao S H, Dong C, Zhu Z D, Gu W Y 2019 Quantum Inf. Process. 18 304 Google Scholar
[9]	Liu H W, Qu W X, Dou T Q, Wang J P, Zhang Y, Ma H Q 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 100309 Google Scholar
[10]	Liu K, Li J, Zhu J R, Zhang C M, Wang Q 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 120302 Google Scholar
[11]	Gan Y H, Wang Y, Bao W S, He R S, Zhou C, Jiang M S 2019 Chin. Phys. Lett. 36 040301 Google Scholar
[12]	Du G H, Li H W, Wang Y, Bao W S 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 090301 Google Scholar
[13]	Brassard G, Lütkenhaus N, Mor T, Sanders B C 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 1330 Google Scholar
[14]	陈艳辉, 王金东, 杜聪 2019 68 130301 Google Scholar Chen Y H, Wang J D, Du C 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 130301 Google Scholar
[15]	沈咏, 邹宏新 2010 59 1473 Google Scholar Shen Y, Zou Y X 2010 Acta Phys. Sin. 59 1473 Google Scholar
[16]	Huang J Z, Yin Z Q, Wang S, Li H W, Chen W, Han Z F 2012 Eur. Phys. J. D 66 159 Google Scholar
[17]	Lo H K, Curty M, Qi B 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 130503 Google Scholar
[18]	Silva T F D, Vitoreti D, Xavier G B, Temporão G P, von der Weid J P 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 052303 Google Scholar
[19]	Tang Z Y, Liao Z F, Xu F H, Qi B, Qian L, Lo H K 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 190503 Google Scholar
[20]	Yin H L, Chen T Y, Yu Z W, Liu H, You L X, Zhou Y H, Chen S J, Mao Y Q, Huang M Q, Zhang W J, Chen H, Li M J, Nolan D, Zhou F, Jiang X, Wang Z, Zhang Q, Wang X B, Pan J W 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 190501 Google Scholar
[21]	Yin Z Q, Wang S, Chen W, Li H W, Guo G C, Han Z F 2014 Quantum Inf. Process. 13 1237 Google Scholar
[22]	Wang C, Yin Z Q, Wang S, Chen W, Han Z F 2017 Optica 4 1016 Google Scholar
[23]	Zhang C M, Zhu J R, Wang Q 2017 Phys. Rev. A 95 032309 Google Scholar
[24]	Liu H W, Wang J P, Ma H Q, Sun S H 2018 Optica 5 902 Google Scholar
[25]	Zhang H, Zhang C H, Zhang C M, Guo G C, Wang Q 2019 Quantum Inform. Process. 18 313 Google Scholar
[26]	Xue Q Y, Jiao R Z 2019 JOSA B 36 476 Google Scholar
[27]	Pramanik T, Park B K, Cho Y, Han S W, Kim Y S, Moon S 2017 Phys. Lett. A 381 2497 Google Scholar
[28]	Yoon J, Pramanik T, Park B K, Han S W, Kim S, Kim Y S, Moon S 2019 Opt. Commun. 441 64 Google Scholar
[29]	Zhang C M, Zhang J R, Wang Q 2017 J. Lightwave Technol. 35 4574 Google Scholar

Catalog

Vol. 68, Issue 24 - 2019-12-20

Metrics

Abstract views: 10241
PDF Downloads: 110
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板