Stabilizing multi-rotation periodic trajectories by the time-varying switching extended time-delay feedback control

Zeng Jian-Jian; Bao Li-Juan

doi:10.7498/aps.72.20222294

Abstract

Control parameters are frequently subjected to certain restrictions in the engineering practice of chaos control. It is difficult to stabilize multi-rotation unstable periodic trajectory when the stability range is too small and outside the restrictions of control parameters. Thus, it is fundamentally important to expand the stability range of the controlled multi-rotation unstable periodic trajectory by using an applicable method. In this work, the original extended time-delay feedback control is improved based on the time-varying switching strategy, which leads to the time-varying switching extended time-delay feedback control. The time-varying switching extended time-delay feedback control only applies the control to the controlled system in a specific period, and does not apply the control to it in other periods, this is different from the continuous control of the original extended time-delay feedback control. The specific performance of the time-varying switching extended time-delay feedback control in stabilizing unstable multi-rotation periodic trajectories is investigated by case studies. The maximum Floquet multiplier of the controlled periodic trajectory is calculated, and the relationship between the stability region of the controlled multi-rotation periodic trajectory and the switching frequency is obtained. The results show that with the increase of switching frequency, the stability region of the controlled multi-rotation periodic trajectory presents a non-smooth change. In particular, the stability region of the time-varying switching extended time-delay feedback control is significantly larger than that of the original extended time-delay feedback control when an appropriate switching frequency is selected.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

School of Mathematics and Information Sciences, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang 330063, China

Corresponding author: Bao Li-Juan, baolijuan2718@163.com

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11872197).

FullText HTML

References

[1]	石航, 王丽丹 2019 68 200501 Google Scholar Shi H, Wang L D 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 200501 Google Scholar
[2]	孔江涛, 黄健, 龚建兴, 李尔玉 2018 67 098901 Google Scholar Kong J T, Huang J, Gong J X, Li E Y 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 098901 Google Scholar
[3]	秦铭宏, 赖强, 吴永红 2022 71 160502 Google Scholar Qin M H, Lai Q, Wu Y H 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 160502 Google Scholar
[4]	Lima R, Pettini M 1990 Phys. Rev. A 41 726 Google Scholar
[5]	Braiman Y, Goldhirsch I 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 2545 Google Scholar
[6]	Lathrop D P, Kostelich E J 1989 Phys. Rev. A 40 4028 Google Scholar
[7]	Ott E, Grebogi C, Yorke J A 1990 Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 1196 Google Scholar
[8]	Pyragas K 1992 Phys. Lett. A 170 421 Google Scholar
[9]	Mitra R K, Banik A K, Chatterjee S 2018 J. Comput. Nonlin. Dyn. 13 031001 Google Scholar
[10]	Kuznetsov N V, Leonov G A, Shumafov M M 2015 IFAC-PapersOnLine 48 706 Google Scholar
[11]	张士荣, 赵俊杰, 谈发明 2022 激光杂志 43 154 Google Scholar Zhang S R, Zhao J J, Tan F M 2022 Laser J. 43 154 Google Scholar
[12]	Pyragas K, Novičenko V 2013 Phys. Rev. E 88 12903
[13]	Hu H Y 2004 J. Sound Vib. 275 1009 Google Scholar
[14]	Nakajima H 1997 Phys. Lett. A 232 207 Google Scholar
[15]	Amann A, Hooton E W 2013 Philos. T. R. Soc. A 371 0120463
[16]	Pyragas K 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 2265 Google Scholar
[17]	颜森林 2021 70 080501 Google Scholar Yan S L 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 080501 Google Scholar
[18]	Zheng Y G, Zhang Y Y 2021 J. Franklin I. 358 1240 Google Scholar
[19]	Pyragas K 1995 Phys. Lett. A 206 323 Google Scholar
[20]	De Paula A S, Savi M A 2009 ISO4. 42 2981
[21]	Robert B, Feki M, Iu H H 2006 Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 16 113 Google Scholar
[22]	Banerjee T, Sarkar B C 2012 Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 22 1230044 Google Scholar
[23]	Zheng Y G, Zhang Y Y 2021 Commun. Nonlinear. Sci. 98 105788 Google Scholar
[24]	Schröder M, Mannattil M, Dutta D, Chakraborty S, Timme M 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 054101 Google Scholar
[25]	Tandon A, Schröder M, Mannattil M, Timme M, Chakraborty S 2016 Chaos 26 094817 Google Scholar
[26]	Li S, Sun N, Chen L, Wang X 2018 Phys. Rev. E 98 012304
[27]	Ghosh A, Godara P, Chakraborty S 2018 Chaos 28 053112 Google Scholar
[28]	Buscarino A, Frasca M, Branciforte M, Fortuna L, Sprott J C 2017 Nonlinear Dynam. 88 673 Google Scholar
[29]	Socolar J E, Sukow D W, Gauthier D J 1994 Phys. Rev. E 50 3245
[30]	Eckhardt B, Yao D 1993 Physica D 65 100 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 Duffing系统的混沌吸引子

Figure 1. The chaotic attractor of Duffing system.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 Duffing系统的多旋转周期轨线$ {\hat X_2}(t) $在 xoy 平面上的投影

Figure 2. The projection of the high-period UPO $ {\hat X_2}(t) $ with period-2 circles of Duffing system on the xoy plane.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 系统(10)式的时间序列和TSEDFC控制在不同时段上切换示意图, 在灰色时段施加控制, 而在灰色时段外不施加控制

Figure 3. The time series of system (10) and the schematic diagram of the switching of TSEDFC control signals in different time intervals, where the control signal exists in the gray time intervals and disappears outside the gray time intervals.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 受控多旋转周期轨线$ {\hat X_2}(t) $的稳定区域随切换频率$ \omega $的变化曲线, 其中稳定域是蓝色区域, Floquet乘数的最大幅度小于1

Figure 4. The relationships between the stable domain of the controlled high-period UPO $ {\hat X_2}(t) $ and switching frequency $ \omega $, where the stable domain is the blue region and the largest magnitude of the Floquet multipliers is less than one.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 受控多旋转周期轨线$ {\hat X_2}(t) $的最大Floquet乘数随反馈增益系数$ g $的变化曲线对比图, 红色虚线和蓝色实线分别对应于EDFC和TSEDFC

Figure 5. The largest magnitudes of the Floquet multipliers of the controlled high-period UPO $ {\hat X_2}(t) $ as functions of the feedback gain$ g $. The red dashed lines and blue solid lines correspond to EDFC and TSEDFC, respectively

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 6 受控多旋转周期轨线$ {\hat X_2}(t) $的误差指数$ {E_{{\text{dex}}}} $随反馈增益系数$ g $的变化曲线对比图, 红色虚线和蓝色实线分别对应于EDFC和TSEDFC

Figure 6. The error indices $ {E_{{\text{dex}}}} $ of the controlled high-period UPO $ {\hat X_2}(t) $ as functions of the feedback gain$ g $. The red dashed lines and blue solid lines correspond to EDFC and TSEDFC, respectively

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 7 Röossler系统的混沌吸引子

Figure 7. The chaotic attractor of Röossler system.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 8 Röossler系统的不稳定多旋转周期轨线在$ xoy $平面上的投影　(a)多旋转周期轨线$ {X_2}(t) $; (b)多旋转周期轨线$ {X_3}(t) $

Figure 8. The projection of the high-period UPO $ {X_k}(t) $ with period-k circles of Röossler system on the $ xoy $ plane: (a) The high-period UPO $ {X_2}(t) $ with period-2 circles; (b) the high-period UPO $ {X_3}(t) $ with period-3 circles.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 9 受控多旋转周期轨线$ {X_k}(t) $的稳定区域随切换频率$ \omega $的变化曲线，其中稳定区域是蓝色区域，Floquet乘数的最大幅度小于1　(a) 受控多旋转周期轨线$ {X_2}(t) $; (b) 受控多旋转周期轨线$ {X_3}(t) $

Figure 9. The relationships between the stable domain of the controlled high-period UPOs $ {X_k}(t) $ and the switching frequency $ \omega $, where the stable domain is the gray region where the largest magnitude of the Floquet multipliers is less than one: (a) The projection of the controlled high-period UPO $ {X_2}(t) $ with period-2 circles; (b) the projection of the controlled high-period UPO $ {X_3}(t) $ with period-3 circles.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 10 受控多旋转周期轨线$ {X_k}(t) $的最大Floquet乘数随反馈增益系数$ g $的变化曲线对比图, 红色虚线和蓝色实线分别对应于EDFC和TSEDFC　(a) 受控多旋转周期轨线$ {X_2}(t) $; (b)受控多旋转周期轨线$ {X_3}(t) $

Figure 10. The largest magnitudes of the Floquet multipliers of the controlled high-period UPOs $ {X_k}(t) $ as functions of the feedback gain$ g $. The red dashed lines and blue solid lines correspond to EDFC and TSEDFC, respectively: (a) The projection of the controlled high-period UPO $ {X_2}(t) $ with period-2 circles; (b) the projection of the controlled high-period UPO $ {X_3}(t) $ with period-3 circles.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 11 受控多旋转周期轨线$ {X_k}(t) $的误差指数$ {E_{{\text{dex}}}} $随反馈增益系数$ g $的变化曲线对比图, 红色虚线和蓝色实线分别对应于EDFC和TSEDFC　(a) 受控多旋转周期轨线$X_2(t) $; (b) 受控多旋转周期轨线$X_3(t) $

Figure 11. The error indices $ {E_{{\text{dex}}}} $of the controlled high-period UPO $ {X_k}(t) $ as functions of the feedback gain$ g $. The red dashed lines and blue solid lines correspond to EDFC and TSEDFC, respectively: (a) The projection of the controlled high-period UPO $X_2(t) $ with period-2 circles; (b) the projection of the controlled high-period UPO $X_3(t) $ with period-3 circles.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

map

[1]	石航, 王丽丹 2019 68 200501 Google Scholar Shi H, Wang L D 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 200501 Google Scholar
[2]	孔江涛, 黄健, 龚建兴, 李尔玉 2018 67 098901 Google Scholar Kong J T, Huang J, Gong J X, Li E Y 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 098901 Google Scholar
[3]	秦铭宏, 赖强, 吴永红 2022 71 160502 Google Scholar Qin M H, Lai Q, Wu Y H 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 160502 Google Scholar
[4]	Lima R, Pettini M 1990 Phys. Rev. A 41 726 Google Scholar
[5]	Braiman Y, Goldhirsch I 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 2545 Google Scholar
[6]	Lathrop D P, Kostelich E J 1989 Phys. Rev. A 40 4028 Google Scholar
[7]	Ott E, Grebogi C, Yorke J A 1990 Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 1196 Google Scholar
[8]	Pyragas K 1992 Phys. Lett. A 170 421 Google Scholar
[9]	Mitra R K, Banik A K, Chatterjee S 2018 J. Comput. Nonlin. Dyn. 13 031001 Google Scholar
[10]	Kuznetsov N V, Leonov G A, Shumafov M M 2015 IFAC-PapersOnLine 48 706 Google Scholar
[11]	张士荣, 赵俊杰, 谈发明 2022 激光杂志 43 154 Google Scholar Zhang S R, Zhao J J, Tan F M 2022 Laser J. 43 154 Google Scholar
[12]	Pyragas K, Novičenko V 2013 Phys. Rev. E 88 12903
[13]	Hu H Y 2004 J. Sound Vib. 275 1009 Google Scholar
[14]	Nakajima H 1997 Phys. Lett. A 232 207 Google Scholar
[15]	Amann A, Hooton E W 2013 Philos. T. R. Soc. A 371 0120463
[16]	Pyragas K 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 2265 Google Scholar
[17]	颜森林 2021 70 080501 Google Scholar Yan S L 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 080501 Google Scholar
[18]	Zheng Y G, Zhang Y Y 2021 J. Franklin I. 358 1240 Google Scholar
[19]	Pyragas K 1995 Phys. Lett. A 206 323 Google Scholar
[20]	De Paula A S, Savi M A 2009 ISO4. 42 2981
[21]	Robert B, Feki M, Iu H H 2006 Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 16 113 Google Scholar
[22]	Banerjee T, Sarkar B C 2012 Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 22 1230044 Google Scholar
[23]	Zheng Y G, Zhang Y Y 2021 Commun. Nonlinear. Sci. 98 105788 Google Scholar
[24]	Schröder M, Mannattil M, Dutta D, Chakraborty S, Timme M 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 054101 Google Scholar
[25]	Tandon A, Schröder M, Mannattil M, Timme M, Chakraborty S 2016 Chaos 26 094817 Google Scholar
[26]	Li S, Sun N, Chen L, Wang X 2018 Phys. Rev. E 98 012304
[27]	Ghosh A, Godara P, Chakraborty S 2018 Chaos 28 053112 Google Scholar
[28]	Buscarino A, Frasca M, Branciforte M, Fortuna L, Sprott J C 2017 Nonlinear Dynam. 88 673 Google Scholar
[29]	Socolar J E, Sukow D W, Gauthier D J 1994 Phys. Rev. E 50 3245
[30]	Eckhardt B, Yao D 1993 Physica D 65 100 Google Scholar

Catalog

Vol. 72, Issue 8 - 2023-04-20

Metrics

Abstract views: 3427
PDF Downloads: 58
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板