搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

不同相对湿度条件下复杂外混合气溶胶粒子群的光学特性研究

王明军 于记华 白亮亮 周熠铭

引用本文:
Citation:

不同相对湿度条件下复杂外混合气溶胶粒子群的光学特性研究

王明军, 于记华, 白亮亮, 周熠铭

Study on optical properties of ensemble of complex externally mixed aerosol particles under different relative humidity conditions

Wang Ming-jun, Yu ji-hua, Bai liang-liang, Zhou Yi-ming
PDF
导出引用
  • 湿度环境下的气溶胶粒子群具有形状不一、成分不同、密度不等、复折射率多样、吸湿性参数不唯一、长短轴比不固定等复杂的微物理特性,并且这些物理量会直接影响激光的传输和散射特性。基于湿度环境下气溶胶粒子存在的各种可能性,本文充分考虑了气溶胶粒子的形态(球形、扁椭球形、长椭球形、不规则形)、尺度谱、复折射率、密度、长短轴比及其分布模型、吸湿性参数等理化特性的多样性,构建了一种复杂外混合气溶胶粒子群的光散射模型。基于该光散射模型,数值分析典型激光波长(0.78mm、0.905mm、1.064mm、1.55mm、2.1mm)入射下不同混合比例和相对湿度对消光系数、单次散射反照率、不对称因子、散射相矩阵、后向散射系数、激光雷达比、线性退偏比等光学特性的影响。结果表明:消光系数、相函数P11对混合比例和相对湿度均表现出较强的敏感性,且随着相对湿度的增加,消光系数和相函数P11的前向散射也随之增大;相比混合比例,单次散射反照率、不对称因子对相对湿度更加敏感;不同散射角处的线偏振、圆偏振特性对相对湿度和波长的敏感性差异显著;后向散射系数和激光雷达比成反比,且它们对混合比例和相对湿度均比较敏感,相对湿度对线性退偏比的影响较大,而混合比例的影响较弱。本文所提出的复杂气溶胶光散射模型进一步丰富了气溶胶光学特性的研究,为研究不同湿度环境下的大气物理、遥感探测、光通信等应用提供了理论支撑。
    The microphysical quantities (particle shape, composition, size, density, complex refractive index, size distribution model, aspect ratio, hygroscopic parameter, etc.) of the ensemble of complex externally mixed aerosol particles in humid environments (sea fog, water mist, haze, etc.) vary greatly. These microphysical quantities directly affect the laser transmission and scattering properties. Due to the optical properties (extinction coefficient, absorption coefficient, backscattering coefficient, phase function, etc.) of the ensemble of complex externally mixed aerosol particles directly determine the propagation properties of laser signals in the atmosphere, as well as the intensity and shape of echo signals. Therefore, studying the optical properties of the ensemble of complex externally mixed aerosol particles in humid environments is of significant importance for engineering applications such as autonomous driving, mapping, remote sensing detection, and more.
    Based on the various possibilities of aerosol particles existing in humid environments, the diversity of physicochemical properties of aerosol particles, including their shape (sphere, oblate spheroid, prolate spheroid, and irregular), size distribution, complex refractive index, density, aspect ratio and its distribution models, as well as hygroscopicity parameters, etc., was fully taken into consideration in this paper. Therefore, a scattering model of the ensemble of complex externally mixed aerosol particles was presented in Section 2. Based on the presented complex aerosol scattering model, the influence of different mixing ratios (MR), and relative humidity (RH) on the optical properties, such as extinction coefficient, single scattering albedo, scattering phase matrix, asymmetry factor, backscattering coefficient, lidar ratio, and linear depolarization ratio, were numerically analyzed at typical laser wavelengths incident (0.78mm, 0.905mm, 1.064mm, 1.55mm, and 2.1mm).
    In order to verify and illustrate the rationality of the complex aerosol scattering model presented in this paper, it was compared with the scattering model of maritime pollution aerosol in OPAC in Section 3.1. The results show that the optical properties of these two different aerosol scattering models vary similarly with wavelength, although differences exist; overall, the differences are relatively small. Therefore, the influences of MR on the optical properties of the ensemble of complex internally mixed aerosol particles were analyzed in Section 3.2. The influences of RH on the optical properties of the ensemble of complex internally mixed aerosol particles were also analyzed in Section 3.3. The numerical results indicate that the extinction coefficient and phase function P11 exhibit strong sensitivity to both the MR and RH. As RH increases, the extinction coefficient, and the forward scattering of P11 also increase. Compared to MR, single scattering albedo and asymmetry factor are more sensitive to RH. Significant differences in the sensitivity of linear, and circular polarization properties to RH and wavelength are observed at different scattering angles. The backscattering coefficient is found to be inversely proportional to the lidar ratio, and both the backscattering coefficient and lidar ratio are sensitive to MR and RH. It is observed that RH has a more pronounced effect on the linear depolarization ratio, while the influence of MR is weaker. The complex scattering model presented in this paper further expands the study of aerosol optical properties and provides theoretical support for studying engineering applications involving lasers in different RHs environments. It is worth emphasizing that this paper only focuses on external mixing. Therefore, the optical properties of the ensemble of complex internally mixed aerosol particles under different RHs will be the focus of future research.
  • [1]

    Hess M, Koepke P, Schult I 1998B. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 79 831

    [2]

    Wang L 2022M.S. Thesis (Wuhan: Wuhan University of Science and Technology) (in Chinese) [王莉2022硕士学位论文(武汉: 武汉科技大学)]

    [3]

    Zhao J J, Gu F, Gu J H, Cui F P 2020Acta Opt. Sin. 40 0501001(in Chinese) [赵佳佳, 顾芳, 张加宏, 崔芬萍2020光学学报40 0501001]

    [4]

    Koepke P, Gasteiger J, Hess M 2015Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15 5947

    [5]

    Tao Z, Wang Z, Yang S, Shan H, Ma X, Zhang H, Zhao S, Liu D, Xie C, Wang Y 2016Atmos. Meas. Tech. 9 1369

    [6]

    Lian W, Dai C, Chen S, Zhang Y, Wu F, Zhang C, Wang C, Wei H 2024Remote Sens. 16 770

    [7]

    Petters M D, Kreidenweis S M 2007Atmos. Chem. Phys. 7 1961

    [8]

    Zieger P, Fierz-Schmidhauser R, Weingartner E, Baltensperger U 2013Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13 10609

    [9]

    Gasteiger J, Wiegner M 2018Geosci. Model Dev. 11 2739

    [10]

    Zhang X H, Dai C M, Zhang X, Wei H L, Zhu X J, Ma J 2019Infrar. Laser Eng. 48 0809002(in Chinese) [张学海, 戴聪明, 张鑫, 魏合理, 朱希娟, 马静2019红外与激光工程48 0809002]

    [11]

    Zhan J T, Zhang S, Fu Q, Duan J, Li Y C, Jiang H L 2020Infrar. Laser Eng. 49 20200057(in Chinese) [战俊彤, 张肃, 付强, 段锦, 李英超, 姜会林2020红外与激光工程49 20200057]

    [12]

    Shen C, Zhang S, Fu Q, Zhan J, Duan J, Li Y 2023Front. Phys. 11 1266027

    [13]

    Wu S, Gao X, Dou X, Xie L 2024J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 312 108808

    [14]

    Gasteiger J, Wiegner M, Groß S, Freudenthaler V, Toledano C, Tesche M, Kandler K 2011Tellus B: Chem. Phys. Meteorol. 63 725

    [15]

    Zhang X H, Wei H L, Dai C M, Cao Y N, Li X B 2015Acta Phys. Sin. 22 224205(in Chinese) [张学海, 魏合理, 戴聪明, 曹亚楠, 李学彬2015 22 224205]

    [16]

    Dubovik O, Sinyuk A, Lapyonok T, Holben B N, Mishchenko M, Yang P, Eck T F, Volten H, Muñoz O, Veihelmann B, Van der Zande W J, Leon J F, Sorokin M, Slutsker I 2006J. Geophys. Res. 111 D11208

    [17]

    Kandler K, Schütz L, Deutscher C, Ebert M, Hofmann H, Jäckel S, Jaenicke R, Knippertz P, Lieke K, Massling A, Petzold A, Schladitz B, Weinzierl A, Wiedensohler, Zorn S, Weinbruch1 S 2009Tellus B 61 32

    [18]

    Li L, Zheng X, Li Z Q, Li Z H, Dubovik O, Chen X F, Wendisch M 2017Opt. Express 25 A813

    [19]

    Wang M J, Wu Z S, Li Y L, Zhang X, You J G 2006Infrar. Laser Eng. 35 66(in Chinese) [王明军, 吴振森, 李应乐, 张小安, 由金光2006红外与激光工程35 66]

    [20]

    Wang M J, Yu J H, Ke X Z, Wu T 20182018 Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium Toyama, Japan, August 1-4, 2018 p1141

    [21]

    Meng Z, Yang P, Kattawar G W, Bi L, Liou K N, Laszlo I 2010J. Aerosol Sci. 41 501

    [22]

    Jung C H, Lee J Y, Um J, Lee S S, Yoon Y J, Kim Y P 2019Appl. Sci. 9 1443

    [23]

    Castellanos P, Colarco P, Espinosa W R, Guzewich S D, Levy R C, Miller R L, Chin M, Kahn R A, Kemppinen O, Moosmüller H, Nowottnick E P 2024Remote Sens. Environ. 303 113982

    [24]

    Liou K N, Yang P 2016Light Scattering by Ice Crystals: Fundamentals and Applications (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp100-101

    [25]

    Akpootu D O, Bello G, Alaiyemola S R, Abdullahi Z, Aruna S, Umar M, Badmus T O, Isah A K, Abdulsalam M K, Aminu Z 2023DUJOPAS 9 86

  • [1] 胡帅, 高太长, 李浩, 杨波, 江志东, 陈鸣, 李书磊. 基于时域多分辨算法的非球形气溶胶散射特性仿真模拟.  , doi: 10.7498/aps.66.044207
    [2] 付成花. 微纳粒子光学散射分析.  , doi: 10.7498/aps.66.097301
    [3] 张永燕, 吴九汇, 曾涛, 钟宏民. 利用激光光梯度力消除气溶胶雾霾粒子的机理研究.  , doi: 10.7498/aps.65.074203
    [4] 聂敏, 任家明, 杨光, 张美玲, 裴昌幸. 非球形气溶胶粒子及大气相对湿度对自由空间量子通信性能的影响.  , doi: 10.7498/aps.65.190301
    [5] 张学海, 魏合理, 戴聪明, 曹亚楠, 李学彬. 取向比对椭球气溶胶粒子散射特性的影响.  , doi: 10.7498/aps.64.224205
    [6] 曾伦武, 张浩, 唐中良, 宋润霞. 拓扑绝缘体椭球粒子的电磁散射.  , doi: 10.7498/aps.61.177303
    [7] 范萌, 陈良富, 李莘莘, 陶金花, 苏林, 邹铭敏, 张莹, 韩冬. 非球形气溶胶粒子短波红外散射特性研究.  , doi: 10.7498/aps.61.204202
    [8] 孙贤明, 王海华, 申晋, 王淑君. 随机取向双层椭球粒子偏振散射特性研究.  , doi: 10.7498/aps.60.114216
    [9] 方伟, 孙俊, 谢振平, 须文波. 量子粒子群优化算法的收敛性分析及控制参数研究.  , doi: 10.7498/aps.59.3686
    [10] 白璐, 汤双庆, 吴振森, 谢品华, 汪世美. 紫外波段多分散系气溶胶散射相函数随机抽样方法研究.  , doi: 10.7498/aps.59.1749
    [11] 卿 涛, 邵天敏, 温诗铸. 材料表面之间黏附过程分析.  , doi: 10.7498/aps.56.1555
    [12] 郝 楠, 周 斌, 陈立民. 利用差分吸收光谱法测量亚硝酸和反演气溶胶参数.  , doi: 10.7498/aps.55.1529
    [13] 司福祺, 刘建国, 谢品华, 张玉钧, 窦 科, 刘文清. 差分吸收光谱技术监测大气气溶胶粒谱分布.  , doi: 10.7498/aps.55.3165
    [14] 楼智美. 非中心力场中经典粒子的轨道参数方程与对称性.  , doi: 10.7498/aps.54.1460
    [15] 吴 鹏, 韩一平, 刘德芳. 大粒子对高斯波束散射的数值模拟.  , doi: 10.7498/aps.54.2676
    [16] 白 璐, 吴振森, 陈 辉, 郭立新. 高斯波束入射下串粒子的散射问题.  , doi: 10.7498/aps.54.2025
    [17] 夏柱红, 方黎, 郑海洋, 胡睿, 张玉莹, 孔祥和, 顾学军, 朱元, 张为俊, 鲍健, 熊鲁源. 气溶胶单粒子粒径的实时测量方法研究.  , doi: 10.7498/aps.53.320
    [18] 陈 刚, 楼智美. 四参数双原子分子势阱中相对论粒子的束缚态.  , doi: 10.7498/aps.52.1075
    [19] 韩一平, 吴振森. 椭球粒子电磁散射的边界条件的讨论.  , doi: 10.7498/aps.49.57
    [20] 饶瑞中. 随机取向立方粒子光散射的数值分析.  , doi: 10.7498/aps.47.1790
计量
  • 文章访问数:  295
  • PDF下载量:  7
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 上网日期:  2025-01-24

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map