搜索

x
中国物理学会期刊

两种光谱相位相干电场重构法对复杂脉冲测量的准确度比较

CSTR: 32037.14.aps.55.1883

Comparison of accuracy between two spectral phase interferometric methods in the characterization of complex pulses

CSTR: 32037.14.aps.55.1883
PDF
导出引用
  • 借助数值模拟的方法,比较了传统的光谱相位相干直接电场重构(SPIDER)法和延时受控无条纹光谱相位相干电场重构(DCFF-SPIDER)法对复杂脉冲测量准确度的差异,并分析其内在的原因.理论计算表明,传统SPIDER方法在测量光谱和相位结构存在突变的复杂脉冲时,通常会出现一定程度的偏差,而DCFF-SPIDER方法能够保持很高的准确度.

     

    By means of numerical simulation, a comparison is made between conventional spectral phase interferometry for direct electric -field reconstruction (SPIDER) and delay-controlled fringe-free SPIDER (DCFF-SPIDER) in the accuracy of characterization of complex pulses. The results show that errors occur likely when complex pulses with abrupt variations in spectra or/and phases are characterized with conventional SPIDER, while DCFF-SPIDER can give high accuracy. The underlying reasons for this difference are discussed.

     

    目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    Baidu
    map