Search

Article

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Dimensionality driven exchange coupling effect in cuprate-manganite superlattices

Ji Hui-Hui Gao Xing-Guo Li Zhi-Lan

Citation:

Dimensionality driven exchange coupling effect in cuprate-manganite superlattices

Ji Hui-Hui, Gao Xing-Guo, Li Zhi-Lan
cstr: 32037.14.aps.73.20240849
PDF
HTML
Get Citation
  • The coupling and competition between various degrees of freedom at the interface of transition metal oxide heterointerfaces greatly enrich their physical properties and expand their relevant application scope. It has been reported that dimensionality is an effective method to regulate the properties of oxide heterostructure. The structure of SCO film exhibits a planar-type-to-chain-type transformation with the change of thickness. In this work, the high-quality SCO/LCMO superlattices are deposited by a pulsed laser deposition system. And the interfacial exchange coupling effect is effectively manipulated by controlling the dimensionality of SCO layer. X-ray absorption spectrum (XAS) measurement shows that the charge transfer occurs at the heterointerface. When the SCO layer is thin, the interfacial superexchange coupling supported by charge transfer generates a weak magnetic moment to pin the ferromagnetic LCMO layer. As the SCO layer thickens, the charge transfer will decrease. Meanwhile, the long-range antiferromagnetic order in thicken SCO layer can interact with LCMO layer, resulting in the exchange bias effect. This experiment confirms the important role of dimensionality in modulating the properties in multifunctional oxide heterostructure.
      Corresponding author: Ji Hui-Hui, jihuihui_sxnu@163.com
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12174237, 52171183).
    [1]

    Chen S R, Zhang Q H, Li X J, Zhao J L, Lin S, Jin Q, Hong H T, Huon A, Charlton T, Li Q, Yan W S, Wang J O, Ge C, Wang C, Wang B T, Fitzsimmons M R, Guo H Z, Gu L, Yin W, Jin K J, Guo E J 2022 Sci. Adv. 8 eabq3981Google Scholar

    [2]

    Lin S, Zhang Q H, Sang X H, Zhao J L, Cheng S, Huon A, Jin Q, Chen S, Chen S G, Cui W J, Guo H Z, He M, Ge C, Wang C, Wang J O, Fitzsimmons M R, Gu L, Zhu T, Jin K J, Guo E J 2021 Nano Lett. 21 3146Google Scholar

    [3]

    Yi D, Liu J, Hsu S L, Zhang L P, Choi Y S, Kim J W, Chen Z H, Clarkson J D, Serrao C R, Arenholz E, Ryan P J, Xu H X, Birgeneau R J, Ramesh R 2016 PNAS 113 6397Google Scholar

    [4]

    Huang K, Wu L, Wang M Y, Swain N, Motapothula M, Luo Y Z, Han K, Chen M F, Ye C, Yang A J, Xu H, Qi D C, N'Diaye A T, Panagopoulos C, Primetzhofer D, Shen L, Sengupta P, Ma J, Feng Z X, Nan C W, Wang X R 2020 Appl. Phys. Rev. 7 011401Google Scholar

    [5]

    Wu M, Zhang X W, Li X M, Qu K, Sun Y W, Han B, Zhu R X, Gao X Y, Zhang J M, Liu K H, Bai X D, Li X Z, Gao P 2022 Nat. Commun. 13 216Google Scholar

    [6]

    Grutter A J, Vailionis A, Borchers J A, Kirby B J, Flint C L, He C, Arenholz E, Suzuki Y 2016 Nano Lett. 16 5647Google Scholar

    [7]

    Ji H H, Liu X, Li Z L, Jiao Y J, Ren G X, Dou J R, Zhou X C, Zhou G W, Chen J S, Xu X H, 2024 J. Alloys Compd. 979 173489Google Scholar

    [8]

    Shi W X, Zheng J, Li Z, Wang M Q, Zhu Z Z, Zhang J E, Zhang H, Chen Y Z, Hu F X, Shen B G, Chen Y S, Sun J R 2023 Small 20 2308172Google Scholar

    [9]

    Liao Z L, Skoropata E, Freeland J W, Guo E J, Desautels R, Gao X, Sohn C, Rastogi A, Ward T Z, Zou T, Charlton T, Fitzsimmons M R, Lee H N 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 589Google Scholar

    [10]

    Zhou G W, Ji H H, Yan Z, Cai M M, Kang P H, Zhang J, Lu J D, Zhang J X, Chen J S, Xu X H 2022 Sci. Chin. Mater. 65 1902Google Scholar

    [11]

    Flint C L, Vailionis A, Zhou H, Jang H, Lee J S, Suzuki Y 2017 Phys. Rev. B 96 144438Google Scholar

    [12]

    Grutter A J, Yang H, Kirby B J, Fitzsimmons M R, Aguiar J A, Browning N D, Jenkins C A, Arenholz E, Mehta V V, Alaan U S, Suzuki Y 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 087202Google Scholar

    [13]

    Chandrasena R U, Flint C L, Yang W, Arab A, Nemšák S, Gehlmann M, Özdöl V B, Bisti F, Wijesekara K D, Meyer-Ilse J, Gullikson E, Arenholz E, Ciston J, Schneider C M, Strocov V N, Suzuki Y, Gray A X 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 155103Google Scholar

    [14]

    Shi W X, Zhang J, Zhan X Z, Li J L, Li Z, Zheng J, Wang M Q, Zhang J E, Zhang H, Zhu T, Chen Y Z, Hu F X, Shen B G, Chen Y S, Sun J R 2024 Appl. Phys. Rev. 11 021403Google Scholar

    [15]

    Zhou G W, Ji H H, Yan Z, Kang P, Li Z, Xu X 2021 Mater. Horiz. 8 2485Google Scholar

    [16]

    陈盛如 林珊, 洪海涛, 崔婷, 金桥, 王灿, 金奎娟, 郭尔佳 2023 72 097502Google Scholar

    Chen S R, Lin S, Hong H T, Cui T, Jin Q, Wang C, Jin K J, Guo E J 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 097502Google Scholar

    [17]

    Li S S, Zhang Q H, Lin S, Sang X H, Need R F, Roldan M A, Cui W J, Hu Z Y, Jin Q, Chen S, Zhao J L, Wang J O, Wang J S, He M, Ge C, Wang C, Lu H B, Wu Z P, Guo H Z, Tong X, Zhu T, Kirby B, Gu L, Jin K J, Guo E J 2021 Adv. Mater. 33 2001324Google Scholar

    [18]

    Samal D, Tan H Y, Molegraaf H, Kuiper B, Siemons W, Bals S, Verbeeck J, Tendeloo G, Takamura Y, Arenholz E, Jenkins C A, Rijnders G, Koste G 2013 Phys. Revi. Lett. 111 096102Google Scholar

    [19]

    Smink A E M, Birkhölzer Y A, Dam J V, Roesthuis F J G, Rijnders G, Hilgenkamp H, Koster G 2020 Phys. Rev. Mater. 4 083806Google Scholar

    [20]

    Zhang Z X, Shao J F, Jin F, Dai K J, Li J Y, Lan D, Hua E, Han Y Y, Wei L, Cheng F, Ge B H, Wang L F, Zhao Y, Wu W B 2022 Nano Lett. 22 7328Google Scholar

    [21]

    Hasegawa S 2012 Charact. Mater. 97 1925Google Scholar

    [22]

    Infante I C, Sánchez F, Wojcik M, Jedryka E, Estradé S, Peiró F, Arbiol J, Laukhin V, Espinós J P 2007 Phys. Rev. B 76 224415Google Scholar

    [23]

    Hadjimichael M, Waelchli A, Mundet B, Mckeown Walker S, De Luca G, Herrero-Martin J, Gibert M, Gariglio S, Triscone J M 2022 APL Mater. 10 101112Google Scholar

    [24]

    Mikhalev K, Verkhovskii S, Gerashenko A, Mirmelstein A, Bobrovskii V, Kumagai K, Furukawa Y, D'yachkova T, Zainulin Y 2004 Phys. Rev. B 69 132415Google Scholar

    [25]

    Ohldag H, Scholl A, Nolting F, Arenholz E, Maat S, Young A T, Carey M, Stöhr J 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 017203Google Scholar

    [26]

    Maniv E, Murphy R A, Haley S C, Doyle S, John C, Maniv A, Ramakrishna S K, Tang Y L, Ercius P, Ramesh R, Reyes A P, Long J R, Analytis J G 2021 Nat. Phys. 17 525Google Scholar

    [27]

    Zhao X W, Ng S M, Wong L W, Wong H F, Liu Y K, Cheng W F, Mak C L, Zhao J, Leung C W 2022 Appl. Phys. Lett. 121 162406Google Scholar

    [28]

    Yang N, Castro D D, Aruta C, Mazzoli C, Minola M, Brookes N B, Sala M M, Prellie W, Lebedev O I, Tebano A, Balestrino G 2012 J. Appl. Phys. 112 123901Google Scholar

    [29]

    Niu W, Fang Y W, Zhang X Q, Weng Y K, Chen Y D, Zhang H, Gan Y L, Yuan X, Zhang S J, Sun J B, Wang Y L, Wei L J, Xu Y B, Wang X F, Liu W Q, Pu Y 2021 Adv. Electron. Mater. 7 2000803Google Scholar

    [30]

    Zheng J, Shi W X, Li Z, Zhang J, Yang C Y, Zhu Z Z, Wang M Q, Zhang J E, Han F R, Zhang H, Chen Y Z, Hu F X, Shen B G, Chen Y S, Sun J 2024 ACS Nano 18 9232Google Scholar

    [31]

    Zhang Z C, Hansmann P 2017 Phys. Rev. X 7 011023

    [32]

    Chen H H, Millis A 2017 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29 243001Google Scholar

    [33]

    Han F R, Chen X B, Wang J L, Huang X D, Zhang J E, Song J H, Liu B G, Chen Y S, Bai X D, Hu F X, Shen B G, Sun J R 2021 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 54 185302Google Scholar

    [34]

    Ji H H, Zhou G W, Wang X, Zhang J, Kang P, Xu X 2021 ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13 15774Google Scholar

  • 图 1  (a) SCO/LCMO 超晶格沉积顺序示意图; (b) L8S2 超晶格样品的部分 RHEED 衍射振荡. 其中, 黄色代表 SCO 层, 紫色代表 LCMO 层

    Figure 1.  (a) Schematic diagram of deposition sequence of SCO/LCMO superlattices; (b) a part of RHEED oscillation intensity of L8S2 superlattices. Yellow represents the SCO layer, purple represents the L8S2 layer.

    图 2  (a) 不同厚度超晶格样品的 XRD 衍射图, 其中, 单层 LCMO及 SCO 作为参照样品; (b) 超晶格面外晶格常数随 SCO 厚度的变化

    Figure 2.  (a) XRD spectra of samples with different thickness, where the single LCMO and SCO are as reference; (b) the out-of-plane lattice parameter as a function of SCO thickness in superlattice.

    图 3  (a) L8S2, (b) L8S5, (c) L8S8样品的 AFM 测试图

    Figure 3.  AFM images of (a) L8S2, (b) L8S5, and (c) L8S8Sample.

    图 4  (a)—(c) L8Sn 超晶格样品的磁性表征(1 emu = 103 A·m2, 1 Oe = 103/(4π) A/m), 其中测试温度为 5 K; (d) HEB (左侧)和MS (右侧) 随SCO 厚度的变化

    Figure 4.  (a)–(c) Magnetic measurement of L8Sn superlattice at 5 K; (d) the dependence of HEB (left axis) and MS (right axis) with thickness of SCO layer.

    图 5  一系列超晶格样品的(a) Mn L-edge和 (b) Cu L-edge 的 XAS 吸收谱图

    Figure 5.  (a) Mn L-edge and (b) Cu L-edge of XAS spectra of a series of samples.

    图 6  SCO 为链状(a)或无限层状(b)构型时, 超晶格界面处的原子构型示意图

    Figure 6.  Interfacial structure of superlattices when SCO layer shows (a) chain-type or (b) planner-type configuration.

    Baidu
  • [1]

    Chen S R, Zhang Q H, Li X J, Zhao J L, Lin S, Jin Q, Hong H T, Huon A, Charlton T, Li Q, Yan W S, Wang J O, Ge C, Wang C, Wang B T, Fitzsimmons M R, Guo H Z, Gu L, Yin W, Jin K J, Guo E J 2022 Sci. Adv. 8 eabq3981Google Scholar

    [2]

    Lin S, Zhang Q H, Sang X H, Zhao J L, Cheng S, Huon A, Jin Q, Chen S, Chen S G, Cui W J, Guo H Z, He M, Ge C, Wang C, Wang J O, Fitzsimmons M R, Gu L, Zhu T, Jin K J, Guo E J 2021 Nano Lett. 21 3146Google Scholar

    [3]

    Yi D, Liu J, Hsu S L, Zhang L P, Choi Y S, Kim J W, Chen Z H, Clarkson J D, Serrao C R, Arenholz E, Ryan P J, Xu H X, Birgeneau R J, Ramesh R 2016 PNAS 113 6397Google Scholar

    [4]

    Huang K, Wu L, Wang M Y, Swain N, Motapothula M, Luo Y Z, Han K, Chen M F, Ye C, Yang A J, Xu H, Qi D C, N'Diaye A T, Panagopoulos C, Primetzhofer D, Shen L, Sengupta P, Ma J, Feng Z X, Nan C W, Wang X R 2020 Appl. Phys. Rev. 7 011401Google Scholar

    [5]

    Wu M, Zhang X W, Li X M, Qu K, Sun Y W, Han B, Zhu R X, Gao X Y, Zhang J M, Liu K H, Bai X D, Li X Z, Gao P 2022 Nat. Commun. 13 216Google Scholar

    [6]

    Grutter A J, Vailionis A, Borchers J A, Kirby B J, Flint C L, He C, Arenholz E, Suzuki Y 2016 Nano Lett. 16 5647Google Scholar

    [7]

    Ji H H, Liu X, Li Z L, Jiao Y J, Ren G X, Dou J R, Zhou X C, Zhou G W, Chen J S, Xu X H, 2024 J. Alloys Compd. 979 173489Google Scholar

    [8]

    Shi W X, Zheng J, Li Z, Wang M Q, Zhu Z Z, Zhang J E, Zhang H, Chen Y Z, Hu F X, Shen B G, Chen Y S, Sun J R 2023 Small 20 2308172Google Scholar

    [9]

    Liao Z L, Skoropata E, Freeland J W, Guo E J, Desautels R, Gao X, Sohn C, Rastogi A, Ward T Z, Zou T, Charlton T, Fitzsimmons M R, Lee H N 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 589Google Scholar

    [10]

    Zhou G W, Ji H H, Yan Z, Cai M M, Kang P H, Zhang J, Lu J D, Zhang J X, Chen J S, Xu X H 2022 Sci. Chin. Mater. 65 1902Google Scholar

    [11]

    Flint C L, Vailionis A, Zhou H, Jang H, Lee J S, Suzuki Y 2017 Phys. Rev. B 96 144438Google Scholar

    [12]

    Grutter A J, Yang H, Kirby B J, Fitzsimmons M R, Aguiar J A, Browning N D, Jenkins C A, Arenholz E, Mehta V V, Alaan U S, Suzuki Y 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 087202Google Scholar

    [13]

    Chandrasena R U, Flint C L, Yang W, Arab A, Nemšák S, Gehlmann M, Özdöl V B, Bisti F, Wijesekara K D, Meyer-Ilse J, Gullikson E, Arenholz E, Ciston J, Schneider C M, Strocov V N, Suzuki Y, Gray A X 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 155103Google Scholar

    [14]

    Shi W X, Zhang J, Zhan X Z, Li J L, Li Z, Zheng J, Wang M Q, Zhang J E, Zhang H, Zhu T, Chen Y Z, Hu F X, Shen B G, Chen Y S, Sun J R 2024 Appl. Phys. Rev. 11 021403Google Scholar

    [15]

    Zhou G W, Ji H H, Yan Z, Kang P, Li Z, Xu X 2021 Mater. Horiz. 8 2485Google Scholar

    [16]

    陈盛如 林珊, 洪海涛, 崔婷, 金桥, 王灿, 金奎娟, 郭尔佳 2023 72 097502Google Scholar

    Chen S R, Lin S, Hong H T, Cui T, Jin Q, Wang C, Jin K J, Guo E J 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 097502Google Scholar

    [17]

    Li S S, Zhang Q H, Lin S, Sang X H, Need R F, Roldan M A, Cui W J, Hu Z Y, Jin Q, Chen S, Zhao J L, Wang J O, Wang J S, He M, Ge C, Wang C, Lu H B, Wu Z P, Guo H Z, Tong X, Zhu T, Kirby B, Gu L, Jin K J, Guo E J 2021 Adv. Mater. 33 2001324Google Scholar

    [18]

    Samal D, Tan H Y, Molegraaf H, Kuiper B, Siemons W, Bals S, Verbeeck J, Tendeloo G, Takamura Y, Arenholz E, Jenkins C A, Rijnders G, Koste G 2013 Phys. Revi. Lett. 111 096102Google Scholar

    [19]

    Smink A E M, Birkhölzer Y A, Dam J V, Roesthuis F J G, Rijnders G, Hilgenkamp H, Koster G 2020 Phys. Rev. Mater. 4 083806Google Scholar

    [20]

    Zhang Z X, Shao J F, Jin F, Dai K J, Li J Y, Lan D, Hua E, Han Y Y, Wei L, Cheng F, Ge B H, Wang L F, Zhao Y, Wu W B 2022 Nano Lett. 22 7328Google Scholar

    [21]

    Hasegawa S 2012 Charact. Mater. 97 1925Google Scholar

    [22]

    Infante I C, Sánchez F, Wojcik M, Jedryka E, Estradé S, Peiró F, Arbiol J, Laukhin V, Espinós J P 2007 Phys. Rev. B 76 224415Google Scholar

    [23]

    Hadjimichael M, Waelchli A, Mundet B, Mckeown Walker S, De Luca G, Herrero-Martin J, Gibert M, Gariglio S, Triscone J M 2022 APL Mater. 10 101112Google Scholar

    [24]

    Mikhalev K, Verkhovskii S, Gerashenko A, Mirmelstein A, Bobrovskii V, Kumagai K, Furukawa Y, D'yachkova T, Zainulin Y 2004 Phys. Rev. B 69 132415Google Scholar

    [25]

    Ohldag H, Scholl A, Nolting F, Arenholz E, Maat S, Young A T, Carey M, Stöhr J 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 017203Google Scholar

    [26]

    Maniv E, Murphy R A, Haley S C, Doyle S, John C, Maniv A, Ramakrishna S K, Tang Y L, Ercius P, Ramesh R, Reyes A P, Long J R, Analytis J G 2021 Nat. Phys. 17 525Google Scholar

    [27]

    Zhao X W, Ng S M, Wong L W, Wong H F, Liu Y K, Cheng W F, Mak C L, Zhao J, Leung C W 2022 Appl. Phys. Lett. 121 162406Google Scholar

    [28]

    Yang N, Castro D D, Aruta C, Mazzoli C, Minola M, Brookes N B, Sala M M, Prellie W, Lebedev O I, Tebano A, Balestrino G 2012 J. Appl. Phys. 112 123901Google Scholar

    [29]

    Niu W, Fang Y W, Zhang X Q, Weng Y K, Chen Y D, Zhang H, Gan Y L, Yuan X, Zhang S J, Sun J B, Wang Y L, Wei L J, Xu Y B, Wang X F, Liu W Q, Pu Y 2021 Adv. Electron. Mater. 7 2000803Google Scholar

    [30]

    Zheng J, Shi W X, Li Z, Zhang J, Yang C Y, Zhu Z Z, Wang M Q, Zhang J E, Han F R, Zhang H, Chen Y Z, Hu F X, Shen B G, Chen Y S, Sun J 2024 ACS Nano 18 9232Google Scholar

    [31]

    Zhang Z C, Hansmann P 2017 Phys. Rev. X 7 011023

    [32]

    Chen H H, Millis A 2017 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29 243001Google Scholar

    [33]

    Han F R, Chen X B, Wang J L, Huang X D, Zhang J E, Song J H, Liu B G, Chen Y S, Bai X D, Hu F X, Shen B G, Sun J R 2021 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 54 185302Google Scholar

    [34]

    Ji H H, Zhou G W, Wang X, Zhang J, Kang P, Xu X 2021 ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13 15774Google Scholar

  • [1] Wei Hao-Ming, Zhang Ying, Zhang Zhou, Wu Yang-Qing, Cao Bing-Qiang. Influence of polarity compensation on exchange bias field in LaMnO3/LaNiO3 superlattices. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(15): 156801. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220365
    [2] Zhu Zhao-Zhao, Feng Zheng, Cai Jian-Wang. Field-free spintronic terahertz emitters based on IrMn/Fe/Pt exchage bias heterostructures. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(4): 048703. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211831
    [3] Field-free spintronic terahertz emitters based on IrMn/Fe/Pt exchage bias heterostructures. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, (): . doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211831
    [4] Wei Ji-Zhou, Zhang Ming, Deng Hao-Liang, Chu Shang-Jie, Du Min-Yong, Yan Hui. Preparation and exchange bias effects of Bi0.8Ba0.2FeO3/La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 heterostructures. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(8): 088101. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.088101
    [5] Li Yong-Chao, Zhou Hang, Pan Dan-Feng, Zhang Hao, Wan Jian-Guo. Exchange bias effect and magnetoelectric coupling behaviors in multiferroic Co/Co3O4/PZT composite thin films. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(9): 097701. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.097701
    [6] Liu Kui-Li, Zhou Si-Hua, Chen Song-Ling. Exchange bias tuning of metal ions doped in CuO nanocomposites. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(13): 137501. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.137501
    [7] Zhou Guang-Hong, Pan Xuan, Zhu Yu-Fu. Exchange bias in BiFeO3/Ni81Fe19 magnetic films and its thermal stability. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(9): 097501. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.097501
    [8] Zhang Hong-Wu, Zhou Wen-Ping, Liu En-Ke, Wang Wen-Hong, Wu Guang-Heng. Magnetic field-induced martensitic transformation, superspin glass and exchange bias in Heusler alloys NiCoMnSn. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(14): 147501. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.147501
    [9] Luo Yi, Zhao Guo-Ping, Yang Hai-Tao, Song Ning-Ning, Ren Xiao, Ding Hao-Feng, Cheng Zhao-Hua. Exchange bias effect in single crystalline phase MnO nanoparticles. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(17): 176102. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.176102
    [10] Yi Ding, Qin Wei, Xie Shi-Jie. Investigation of polarons in perovskite manganites. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(20): 207101. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.207101
    [11] Tian Hong-Yu, Hu Jing-Guo, Xu Xiao-Yong. The influence of the cooling field on the exchange bias in ferromagnet/antiferromagnet bilayers system. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(4): 2757-2761. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.2757
    [12] Yang Xin-Sheng, Zhao Yong. The study of ZnO varistor doped with ferromagnetic manganese oxide. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(5): 3188-3192. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.3188
    [13] Xu Xiao-Yong, Pan Jing, Hu Jing-Guo. Configuration of the antiferromagnetic magnetization and the exchange anisotropy in exchange-biased bilayers. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(9): 5476-5482. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.5476
    [14] Zhai Zhong-Hai, Teng Jiao, Li Bao-He, Wang Li-Jin, Yu Guang-Hua, Zhu Feng-Wu. Exchange bias with perpendicular anisotropy in (Pt/Co)n/FeMn multilayers. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(4): 2064-2068. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.2064
    [15] Pan Jing, Tao Yong-Chun, Hu Jing-Guo. The exchange bias in ferromagnetic/antiferro-magnetic bilayers under the stress field. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(6): 3032-3037. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.3032
    [16] Teng Jiao, Cai Jian-Wang, Xiong Xiao-Tao, Lai Wu-Yan, Zhu Feng-Wu. The establishment and thermal stability of exchange bias in NiFe/FeMn bilayers. Acta Physica Sinica, 2004, 53(1): 272-275. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.272
    [17] Shu Zheng-Huang, Dong Jin-Ming. Affect of the orbital ordering in half-doped manganites on their optical propert ies. Acta Physica Sinica, 2003, 52(11): 2918-2922. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.2918
    [18] Li Ming-Hua, Yu Guang-Hua, He Ge, Zhu Feng-Wu, Lai Wu-Yan. . Acta Physica Sinica, 2002, 51(12): 2854-2857. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.2854
    [19] Teng Jiao, Cai Jian-Wang, Xiong Xiao-Tao, Lai Wu-Yan, Zhu Feng-Wu. Theinfluenceof(Ni0 81 Fe0 1 9)1 -xCrxseedlayerontheexchangebiasofNiFe FeMnbilayers. Acta Physica Sinica, 2002, 51(12): 2849-2853. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.2849
    [20] JING CHAO, JIN XIAO-FENG, DONG GUO-SHENG, GONG XIAO-YAN, YU LI-MING, ZHENG WEI-MIN. EXCHANGE BIASING IN MOLECULAR-BEAM-EPITAXY-GROWN Fe/Fe50Mn50 BILAYERS. Acta Physica Sinica, 2000, 49(10): 2022-2026. doi: 10.7498/aps.49.2022
  • supplement 2024年73卷216102补充材料.pdf supplement
Metrics
  • Abstract views:  476
  • PDF Downloads:  11
  • Cited By: 0
Publishing process
  • Received Date:  18 June 2024
  • Accepted Date:  02 September 2024
  • Available Online:  08 October 2024
  • Published Online:  05 November 2024

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map