Surface effects on buckling of nanowire electrode

Shang Shuai-Peng; Lu Yong-Jun; Wang Feng-Hui

doi:10.7498/aps.71.20211864

Abstract

Nanowire-based electrodes have attracted much attention due to their high surface energy, short distance for lithium insertion, and the ability to accommodate the enormous strain. However, the buckling behavior may occur during lithiation for such wire-like electrodes, which would lead the battery performance to deteriorate. Therefore, it is vital to quantitatively understand the mechanism about the bucking behavior of the nanowire-based electrodes. Although the buckling behavior of wire-like electrode has been extensively studied in the past few decades, the influence of surface effect on it has not yet been thoroughly explored. For this purpose, a theoretical model of surface effects on buckling of nanowire electrode is presented by taking into account the lithium diffusion, stress, and concentration-dependent elastic properties. Based on the established model, the effects of the residual surface tension and elastic hardening/softening coefficients on buckling are investigated. The results show that surface effects can improve the mechanical reliability, thus delaying the critical buckling time of nanowire electrode. In addition, it is indicated that the surface effects depend on the radius size and slenderness ratio of the nanowire electrode, specifically, the smaller the radius size and the larger the slenderness ratio, the greater the influence of the surface effect is. Furthermore, compared with elastic hardening, with the participation of surface effects, the larger the elastic softening coefficient, the longer it takes for the nanowire electrode to reach the buckled state, and the better the stability of the electrode is. The novelty of this work is that the proposed models highlight the importance of surface effects on buckling of nanowire electrode. These findings provide a prospective insight into the designing of higher structural reliability of electrode.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

Bio-inspired and Advanced Energy Research Center, School of Mechanics, Civil Engineering and Architecture, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710129, China

Corresponding author: Wang Feng-Hui, fhwang@nwpu.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11572253, 11972302).

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	Larcher D, Tarascon J 2015 Nat. Chem. 7 19 Google Scholar
[2]	Scrosati B, Garche J 2010 J. Power Sources 195 2419 Google Scholar
[3]	Zhang S, Zhao K, Zhu T, Li J 2017 Prog. Mater. Sci. 89 479 Google Scholar
[4]	Gür T 2018 Energy Environ. Sci. 11 2696 Google Scholar
[5]	Edge J, O’Kane S, Prosser R, Kirkaldy N, Patel A, Hales A, Ghosh A, Ai W, Chen J, Yang J, Li S, Pang M, Bravo D, Tomaszewska A, Marzook M, Radhakrishnan K, Wang H, Patel Y, Wu B, Offer G 2021 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 23 8200 Google Scholar
[6]	Zhang W 2011 J. Power Sources 196 13 Google Scholar
[7]	Chan C, Peng H, Liu G, McIlwrath K, Zhang X, Huggins R, Cui Y 2008 Nat. Nanotechnol. 3 31 Google Scholar
[8]	Yu C, Li X, Ma T, Rong J, Zhang R, Shaffer J, An Y, Liu Q, Wei B, Jiang H 2012 Adv. Energy Mater. 2 68 Google Scholar
[9]	Yao Y, McDowell M, Ryu I, Wu H, Liu N, Hu L, Nix W, Cui Y 2011 Nano Lett. 11 2949 Google Scholar
[10]	Kim H, Han B, Choo J, Cho J 2008 Angew. Chem. 120 10305 Google Scholar
[11]	Dasgupta N P, Sun J, Liu C, Brittman S, Andrews S C, Lim J, Gao H, Yan R, Yang P 2014 Adv. Mater. 26 2137 Google Scholar
[12]	Chen L, Lu N, Xu C, Yu H, Wang T 2009 Electrochim. Acta 54 4198 Google Scholar
[13]	Chan C, Zhang X, Cui Y 2008 Nano Lett. 8 307 Google Scholar
[14]	Liu, X, Fan F, Yang H, Zhang S, Huang J, Zhu T 2013 ACS Nano 7 1495 Google Scholar
[15]	Huang J, Li Z, Chong M, John P, Wu X, Li Q, Scott X, Nicholas S, Xiao H, Arunkumar S 2010 Science 330 1515 Google Scholar
[16]	Wang X, Fan F, Wang J, Wang H, Tao S, Yang A, Liu Y, Beng C, Mao S, Zhu T, Xia S 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 8417 Google Scholar
[17]	Chakraborty J, Please C, Goriely A, Chapman S 2015 Int. J. Solids Struct. 54 66 Google Scholar
[18]	Zhang K, Li Y, Wu J, Zheng B, Yang F 2018 Int. J. Solids Struct. 144 289 Google Scholar
[19]	Shen X, Wan Y 2021 Meccanica 1 1 Google Scholar
[20]	Li Y, Zhang K, Zheng B, Yang F 2016 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 49 285602 Google Scholar
[21]	Zhang K, Chen J, Li Y, Liu D, Zheng B, Kai Y 2020 Results Phys. 16 103018 Google Scholar
[22]	Li Y, Mao W, Zhang K, Jia Y, Yang F 2019 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 52 435502 Google Scholar
[23]	Zhang Y, Zhan S, Zhang K, Zheng B, Lyu L 2021 Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids 85 104111 Google Scholar
[24]	Xing H, Liu Y, Wang B 2019 Acta Mech. 230 4145 Google Scholar
[25]	Yeerella R, Boddeda H, Sengupta A, Chakraborty J 2020 J. Appl. Phys. 128 234901 Google Scholar
[26]	Herring C 1951 Phys. Rev. 82 87 Google Scholar
[27]	Gurtin M, Murdoch A 1975 Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 57 291 Google Scholar
[28]	Miller R, Shenoy V 2000 Nanotechnology 11 139 Google Scholar
[29]	Cammarata R 1994 Prog. Surf. Sci. 46 1 Google Scholar
[30]	Cheng Y, Verbrugge M 2008 J. Appl. Phys. 104 083521 Google Scholar
[31]	Deshpande R, Cheng Y, Verbrugge M 2010 J. Power Sources 195 5081 Google Scholar
[32]	Hao F, Gao X, Fang D 2012 J. Appl. Phys. 112 103507 Google Scholar
[33]	Sengupta A, Chakraborty J 2019 Acta Mech. 231 999 Google Scholar
[34]	Gao Y, Zhou M 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 109 014310 Google Scholar
[35]	Gao X, Fang D, Qu J 2015 Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 471 20150366 Google Scholar
[36]	Jia N, Peng Z, Wang S, Li J, Yao Y, Chen S 2020 Sci. China Ser. E: Technol. Sci. 63 2413 Google Scholar
[37]	Zhang X, Chen H, Fang D 2020 Int. J. Mech. Sci. 169 105323 Google Scholar
[38]	Stein P, Zhao Y, Xu B 2016 J. Power Sources 332 154 Google Scholar
[39]	Bucci G, Swamy T, Bishop S, Sheldon B, Chiang Y, Carter W 2017 J. Electrochem. Soc. 164 A645 Google Scholar
[40]	Lu Y, Zhang P, Wang F, Zhang K, Zhao X 2018 Electrochim. Acta 274 359 Google Scholar
[41]	Young S, Ji L, Chang S, Fang T, Hsueh T, Meen T, Chen I 2007 Nanotechnology 18 225603 Google Scholar
[42]	Riaz M, Nur O, Willander M, Klason P 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 103118 Google Scholar
[43]	Wang G, Feng X 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 141913 Google Scholar
[44]	Shenoy V, Johari P, Qi Y 2010 J. Power Sources 195 6825 Google Scholar
[45]	Qi Y, Guo H, Hector J, L G, Timmons A 2010 J. Electrochem. Soc. 157 A558 Google Scholar
[46]	Qi Y, Hector L, James C, Kim K 2014 J. Electrochem. Soc. 161 F3010 Google Scholar
[47]	Swaminathan N, Balakrishnan S, George K 2015 J. Electrochem. Soc. 163 A488 Google Scholar
[48]	Sharma P, Ganti S, Bhate N 2003 Appl. Phys. Lett. 82 535 Google Scholar
[49]	Zhang X, Shyy W, Marie S 2007 J. Electrochem. Soc. 154 A910 Google Scholar
[50]	Tian L, Rajapakse R 2007 Int. J. Solids Struct. 44 7988 Google Scholar
[51]	He L, Li Z 2006 Int. J. Solids Struct. 43 6208 Google Scholar
[52]	Wang S, Li X, Yi X, Duan H 2021 Extreme Mech. Lett. 44 101211 Google Scholar
[53]	Wang G, Feng X 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 90 231904 Google Scholar
[54]	He J, Lilley C 2008 Nano Lett. 8 1798 Google Scholar
[55]	Song X, Lu Y, Wang F, Zhao X, Chen H 2020 J. Power Sources 452 227803 Google Scholar
[56]	Zhang K, Li Y, Zheng B, Wu G, Wu J, Yang F 2017 Int. J. Solids Struct. 108 230 Google Scholar
[57]	Lee S, McDowell M, Berla L, Nix W, Cui Y 2012 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109 4080 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 纳米线电极在锂化过程中屈曲的示意图　(a)有表面效应; (b)无表面效应

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of nanowire electrode buckling during lithiation: (a) With surface effect; (b) without surface effect.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 临界屈曲压力的结果　(a)临界屈曲压力随时间的变化情况, 其中实线表示考虑了表面效应, 点虚线表示没有考虑表面效应, 且红色线表示弹性硬化($ k=0.5 $), 靛蓝色线表示无弹性硬化/软化($ k=0 $), 黑色线表示弹性软化($ k=-0.5 $); (b)有表面效应与无表面效应的初始临界屈曲压力之比随电极半径的变化情况; (c)有表面效应与无表面效应的初始临界屈曲压力之比随电极长细比的变化情况

Figure 2. Results of critical buckling load: (a) Evolution of critical buckling load with time (The solid lines represent considering the surface effect, dotted lines represent without considering the surface effect, and red lines denote $ k=0.5 $, indigo lines denote $ k=0 $, black lines denote $ k=-0.5 $); (b) ratio of initial critical buckling load between with and without surface effect as a function of radius; (c) ratio of initial critical buckling load between with and without surface effect as a function of slenderness ratio.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 纳米线电极轴力的结果　(a)轴力随时间的变化情况, 其中实线表示考虑了表面效应, 点虚线表示没有考虑表面效应, 且红色线表示弹性硬化($ k=0.5 $), 靛蓝色线表示无弹性硬化/软化($ k=0 $), 黑色线表示弹性软化($ k=-0.5 $); (b) 初始轴力随纳米线电极半径的变化情况

Figure 3. Results of axial force $ {\stackrel{~}{F}}_{z} $: (a) Variation of axial force $ {\stackrel{~}{F}}_{z} $ with time $ \stackrel{~}{t} $ (The solid lines represent considering the surface effect, dotted lines represent without considering the surface effect, and red lines denote $ k=0.5 $, indigo lines denote $ k=0 $, black lines denote $ k=-0.5 $); (b) initial axial force with surface effect as a function of radius

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 纳米线电极屈曲的结果情况　(a)有表面效应的条件下, 轴力与临界屈曲压力之比在不同的电极长细比下随时间的变化情况; (b)无表面效应的条件下, 轴力与临界屈曲压力之比在不同的电极长细比下随时间的变化情况; (c)有表面效应与无表面效应的纳米线电极达到临界屈曲所需的时间之比随电极长细比的变化情况; (d)有表面效应的条件下, 轴力与临界屈曲压力之比在不同的电极尺寸下随时间的变化情况; (e)无表面效应的条件下, 轴力与临界屈曲压力之比在不同的电极尺寸下随时间的变化情况; (f)有表面效应与无表面效应的纳米线电极达到临界屈曲所需的时间之比随电极尺寸的变化情况

Figure 4. Results of nanowire electrode buckling: (a) Under the condition of with surface effect, the ratio of axial force to critical buckling load as a function of time for different slenderness ratio; (b) under the condition of without surface effect, the ratio of axial force to critical buckling load as a function of time for different slenderness ratio; (c) ratio of the time required for nanowire electrodes with surface effect and without surface effect to reach critical buckling varies with slenderness ratio; (d) under the condition of with surface effect, the ratio of axial force to critical buckling load as a function of time for different radius; (e) under the condition of without surface effect, the ratio of axial force to critical buckling load as a function of time for different radius; (f) ratio of the time required for nanowire electrodes with surface effect and without surface effect to reach critical buckling varies with radius.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 弹性硬化/软化系数对屈曲的影响　(a)在有表面效应的条件下, 轴力与临界屈曲压力之比在不同的电极弹性硬化/软化系数下随时间的变化情况; (b)无表面效应的条件下, 轴力与临界屈曲压力之比在不同的电极弹性硬化/软化系数下随时间的变化情况; (c)有表面效应与无表面效应的纳米线电极达到临界屈曲所需的时间之比随电极弹性硬化/软化系数的变化情况

Figure 5. Effect of elastic hardening/softening coefficient on buckling: (a) Under the condition of with surface effect, the ratio of axial force to critical buckling load as a function of time for different hardening/softening coefficient; (b) under the condition of without surface effect, the ratio of axial force to critical buckling load as a function of time for different hardening/softening coefficient; (c) ratio of the time required for nanowire electrodes with surface effect and without surface effect to reach critical buckling varies with hardening/softening coefficient.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

表 1 材料参数

Table 1. Material parameters^[55].

物理参数	符号/单位	值
未锂化的弹性模量	$ {E}_{0} $/GPa	70
泊松比	v	0.2
偏摩尔体积	$\varOmega /({\mathrm{m} }^{3}{\cdot}{\mathrm{m}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{l} }^{-1})$	1.92 × 10^–6
锂的最大浓度	${c}_{\mathrm{m} }/(\mathrm{m}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{l}{\cdot} {\mathrm{m} }^{-3})$	2.33 × 10⁴
扩散系数	${D}_{0}/({\mathrm{m} }^{2}{\cdot} {\mathrm{s} }^{-1})$	1.76 × 10^–15
表面残余张力	$\tau /(\mathrm{J}{\cdot}{\mathrm{m} }^{-2})$	2
长细比	$ {l}_{0}/{r}_{0} $	50
电极半径尺寸	$ {r}_{0} $/nm	10

DownLoad: CSV

map

[1]	Larcher D, Tarascon J 2015 Nat. Chem. 7 19 Google Scholar
[2]	Scrosati B, Garche J 2010 J. Power Sources 195 2419 Google Scholar
[3]	Zhang S, Zhao K, Zhu T, Li J 2017 Prog. Mater. Sci. 89 479 Google Scholar
[4]	Gür T 2018 Energy Environ. Sci. 11 2696 Google Scholar
[5]	Edge J, O’Kane S, Prosser R, Kirkaldy N, Patel A, Hales A, Ghosh A, Ai W, Chen J, Yang J, Li S, Pang M, Bravo D, Tomaszewska A, Marzook M, Radhakrishnan K, Wang H, Patel Y, Wu B, Offer G 2021 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 23 8200 Google Scholar
[6]	Zhang W 2011 J. Power Sources 196 13 Google Scholar
[7]	Chan C, Peng H, Liu G, McIlwrath K, Zhang X, Huggins R, Cui Y 2008 Nat. Nanotechnol. 3 31 Google Scholar
[8]	Yu C, Li X, Ma T, Rong J, Zhang R, Shaffer J, An Y, Liu Q, Wei B, Jiang H 2012 Adv. Energy Mater. 2 68 Google Scholar
[9]	Yao Y, McDowell M, Ryu I, Wu H, Liu N, Hu L, Nix W, Cui Y 2011 Nano Lett. 11 2949 Google Scholar
[10]	Kim H, Han B, Choo J, Cho J 2008 Angew. Chem. 120 10305 Google Scholar
[11]	Dasgupta N P, Sun J, Liu C, Brittman S, Andrews S C, Lim J, Gao H, Yan R, Yang P 2014 Adv. Mater. 26 2137 Google Scholar
[12]	Chen L, Lu N, Xu C, Yu H, Wang T 2009 Electrochim. Acta 54 4198 Google Scholar
[13]	Chan C, Zhang X, Cui Y 2008 Nano Lett. 8 307 Google Scholar
[14]	Liu, X, Fan F, Yang H, Zhang S, Huang J, Zhu T 2013 ACS Nano 7 1495 Google Scholar
[15]	Huang J, Li Z, Chong M, John P, Wu X, Li Q, Scott X, Nicholas S, Xiao H, Arunkumar S 2010 Science 330 1515 Google Scholar
[16]	Wang X, Fan F, Wang J, Wang H, Tao S, Yang A, Liu Y, Beng C, Mao S, Zhu T, Xia S 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 8417 Google Scholar
[17]	Chakraborty J, Please C, Goriely A, Chapman S 2015 Int. J. Solids Struct. 54 66 Google Scholar
[18]	Zhang K, Li Y, Wu J, Zheng B, Yang F 2018 Int. J. Solids Struct. 144 289 Google Scholar
[19]	Shen X, Wan Y 2021 Meccanica 1 1 Google Scholar
[20]	Li Y, Zhang K, Zheng B, Yang F 2016 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 49 285602 Google Scholar
[21]	Zhang K, Chen J, Li Y, Liu D, Zheng B, Kai Y 2020 Results Phys. 16 103018 Google Scholar
[22]	Li Y, Mao W, Zhang K, Jia Y, Yang F 2019 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 52 435502 Google Scholar
[23]	Zhang Y, Zhan S, Zhang K, Zheng B, Lyu L 2021 Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids 85 104111 Google Scholar
[24]	Xing H, Liu Y, Wang B 2019 Acta Mech. 230 4145 Google Scholar
[25]	Yeerella R, Boddeda H, Sengupta A, Chakraborty J 2020 J. Appl. Phys. 128 234901 Google Scholar
[26]	Herring C 1951 Phys. Rev. 82 87 Google Scholar
[27]	Gurtin M, Murdoch A 1975 Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 57 291 Google Scholar
[28]	Miller R, Shenoy V 2000 Nanotechnology 11 139 Google Scholar
[29]	Cammarata R 1994 Prog. Surf. Sci. 46 1 Google Scholar
[30]	Cheng Y, Verbrugge M 2008 J. Appl. Phys. 104 083521 Google Scholar
[31]	Deshpande R, Cheng Y, Verbrugge M 2010 J. Power Sources 195 5081 Google Scholar
[32]	Hao F, Gao X, Fang D 2012 J. Appl. Phys. 112 103507 Google Scholar
[33]	Sengupta A, Chakraborty J 2019 Acta Mech. 231 999 Google Scholar
[34]	Gao Y, Zhou M 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 109 014310 Google Scholar
[35]	Gao X, Fang D, Qu J 2015 Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 471 20150366 Google Scholar
[36]	Jia N, Peng Z, Wang S, Li J, Yao Y, Chen S 2020 Sci. China Ser. E: Technol. Sci. 63 2413 Google Scholar
[37]	Zhang X, Chen H, Fang D 2020 Int. J. Mech. Sci. 169 105323 Google Scholar
[38]	Stein P, Zhao Y, Xu B 2016 J. Power Sources 332 154 Google Scholar
[39]	Bucci G, Swamy T, Bishop S, Sheldon B, Chiang Y, Carter W 2017 J. Electrochem. Soc. 164 A645 Google Scholar
[40]	Lu Y, Zhang P, Wang F, Zhang K, Zhao X 2018 Electrochim. Acta 274 359 Google Scholar
[41]	Young S, Ji L, Chang S, Fang T, Hsueh T, Meen T, Chen I 2007 Nanotechnology 18 225603 Google Scholar
[42]	Riaz M, Nur O, Willander M, Klason P 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 103118 Google Scholar
[43]	Wang G, Feng X 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 141913 Google Scholar
[44]	Shenoy V, Johari P, Qi Y 2010 J. Power Sources 195 6825 Google Scholar
[45]	Qi Y, Guo H, Hector J, L G, Timmons A 2010 J. Electrochem. Soc. 157 A558 Google Scholar
[46]	Qi Y, Hector L, James C, Kim K 2014 J. Electrochem. Soc. 161 F3010 Google Scholar
[47]	Swaminathan N, Balakrishnan S, George K 2015 J. Electrochem. Soc. 163 A488 Google Scholar
[48]	Sharma P, Ganti S, Bhate N 2003 Appl. Phys. Lett. 82 535 Google Scholar
[49]	Zhang X, Shyy W, Marie S 2007 J. Electrochem. Soc. 154 A910 Google Scholar
[50]	Tian L, Rajapakse R 2007 Int. J. Solids Struct. 44 7988 Google Scholar
[51]	He L, Li Z 2006 Int. J. Solids Struct. 43 6208 Google Scholar
[52]	Wang S, Li X, Yi X, Duan H 2021 Extreme Mech. Lett. 44 101211 Google Scholar
[53]	Wang G, Feng X 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 90 231904 Google Scholar
[54]	He J, Lilley C 2008 Nano Lett. 8 1798 Google Scholar
[55]	Song X, Lu Y, Wang F, Zhao X, Chen H 2020 J. Power Sources 452 227803 Google Scholar
[56]	Zhang K, Li Y, Zheng B, Wu G, Wu J, Yang F 2017 Int. J. Solids Struct. 108 230 Google Scholar
[57]	Lee S, McDowell M, Berla L, Nix W, Cui Y 2012 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109 4080 Google Scholar

[1]	Zou Xing, Zhu Zhe, Fang Wen-Xiao. Simulation of surface stress and solid solution modification phase field of nanowire electrocaloric effect. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(10): 100501. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240105
[2]	Li Tao, Cheng Xi-Ming, Hu Chen-Hua. Comparative study of reduced-order electrochemical models of the lithium-ion battery. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(13): 138801. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201894
[3]	Lu Bin, Wang Da-Wei, Chen Yu-Lei, Cui Yan, Miao Yuan-Hao, Dong Lin-Peng. Capacitance model for nanowire gate-all-around tunneling field-effect-transistors. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(21): 218501. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211128
[4]	Yang Dong-Sheng, Liu Guan-Ting. Anti-plane fracture problem of four nano-cracks emanating from a regular 4n-polygon nano-hole in magnetoelectroelastic materials. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(24): 244601. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200850
[5]	Peng Jie-Yang, Wang Jia-Hai, Shen Bin, Li Hao-Liang, Sun Hao-Ming. Influences of nanoscale particles and interparticle compression in electrodes on voltage hysteresis of lithium ion batteries. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(9): 090202. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182302
[6]	Pang Hui. Multi-scale modeling and its simplification method of Li-ion battery based on electrochemical model. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(23): 238801. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.238801
[7]	Ma Hao, Liu Lei, Lu Xue-Sen, Liu Su-Ping, Shi Jian-Ying. Electronic structure and transport properties of cathode material Li2FeSiO4 for lithium-ion battery. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(24): 248201. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.248201
[8]	Yang Xi-Yuan, Quan Jun. Simulations of the size effect on the elastic properties and the inherent mechanism of metallic nanowire. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(11): 116201. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.116201
[9]	Li Juan, Ru Qiang, Sun Da-Wei, Zhang Bei-Bei, Hu She-Jun, Hou Xian-Hua. The lithium intercalation properties of SnSb/MCMB core-shell composite as the anode material for lithium ion battery. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(9): 098201. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.098201
[10]	Huang Le-Xu, Chen Yuan-Fu, Li Ping-Jian, Huan Ran, He Jia-Rui, Wang Ze-Gao, Hao Xin, Liu Jing-Bo, Zhang Wan-Li, Li Yan-Rong. Effects of preparation temperature of graphite oxide on the structure of graphite and electrochemical properties of graphene-based lithium-ion batteries. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(15): 156103. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.156103
[11]	Lan Mu, Xiang Gang, Gu Gang-Xu, Zhang Xi. A Monte Carlo simulation study on growth mechanism of horizontal nanowires on crystal surface. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(22): 228101. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.228101
[12]	Zhou Guo-Rong, Teng Xin-Ying, Wang Yan, Geng Hao-Ran, Hur Bo-Young. Size effect on the freezing behavior of aluminum nanowires. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(6): 066101. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.066101
[13]	Bai Ying, Wang Bei, Zhang Wei-Feng. Nano-LiNiO2 as cathode material for lithium ion battery synthesized by molten salt method. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(6): 068202. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.068202
[14]	Hou Xian-Hua, Hu She-Jun, Shi Lu. Preparation and properties of Sn-Ti alloy anode material for lithium ion batteries. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(3): 2109-2113. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.2109
[15]	Yao Xiao-Hu, Han Qiang. Torsional buckling of a double-walled carbon nanotube under the action of coupled thermo-mechanical load. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(8): 5056-5062. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.5056
[16]	Xin Hao, Han Qiang, Yao Xiao-Hu. Influences of atom vacancies on buckling properties of armchair single-walled carbon nanotubes shown by molecular dynamics simulation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(7): 4391-4396. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.4391
[17]	Luo Wen-Xiong, Huang Shi-Hua, You Fang-Tian, Peng Hong-Shang. The luminescent properties of YBO3:Eu3+ nanocrystal. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(3): 1765-1769. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.1765
[18]	Tian Jian-Hui, Han Xu, Liu Gui-Rong, Long Shu-Yao, Qin Jin-Qi. Investigation of the SiC nano-bar relaxation characteristics. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(2): 643-648. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.643
[19]	Wang Lei, Zhang Hong-Wu, Wang Jin-Bao. Influence of van der Waals force on the buckling of double-walled carbon nanotubes. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(3): 1506-1513. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.1506
[20]	Wang Yu, Wang Xiu-Xi, Ni Xiang-Gui, Wu Heng-An. Buckling behavior of carbon nanotube under compression. Acta Physica Sinica, 2003, 52(12): 3120-3124. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.3120

Catalog

Vol. 71, Issue 3 - 2022-02-05

Metrics

Abstract views: 4544
PDF Downloads: 60
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板