-
Spin caloritronics, which combines the characteristics of thermoelectronics with the characteristics of spintronics, has a wide range of promising applications in high-speed and low-dissipation devices. In this paper, according to the density functional theory combined with nonequilibrium Green’s function method, we propose a scheme for generating pure spin current with spin dependent Seebeck effect in the zigzag-edged graphene nanoribbons by introducing continuous antidots (hexagonal defects). Specifically, by creating an antidot at one edge of the nanoribbon, an X-shape transmission spectrum around the Fermi level is formed, which results from the disrupted edge of the nanoribbon. The mechanism is well explained by the cooperation between the varying localization features of the eigenstates around the Fermi level for the unit cell and the scattering states at the Fermi level for the device. Therefore, the electrons of the two spin channels flow in the opposite directions under a temperature gradient, generating the spin current and charge current. By slightly tuning the chemical potential of the device, the charge current can be zero, while the spin current is not equal to zero. With the increase of adjacent antidot number along the width of the nanoribbons, the structures are more disrupted, thus promoting the pure spin current due to the increase of the spin Seebeck coefficient. However, for zigzag graphene nanoribbons with W zigzag carbon chains, the pure spin current decreases when the number of the antidots are more than (W/2–1), which results from the decrease of the spin conductance. So, the maximum pure spin current can be obtained when the number of the continuous antidots introduced along the width of nanoribbons reaches (W/2–1). These findings indicate a novel strategy for thermally generating the spin current by introducing continuous antidots along the nanoribbon bandwidth in zigzag graphene nanoribbons and will be greatly instructive in designing the graphene spintronic devices.
-
Keywords:
- spin caloritronics /
- antidot /
- pure spin current /
- density functional theory
[1] Wolf S A, Awschalom D D, Buhrman R A, Daughton J M, von Molnár S, Roukes M L, Chtchelkanova A Y, Treger D M 2001 Science 294 1488
Google Scholar
[2] Awschalom D D, Flatté M E 2007 Nat. Phys. 3 153
Google Scholar
[3] Mishchenko E G, Shytov A V, Halperin B I 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 226602
Google Scholar
[4] Tao X, Hao H, Wang X, Zheng X, Zeng Z 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 108 233106
Google Scholar
[5] Qing F, Sun X, Xie C 2005 Phys. Rev. B 72 245305
Google Scholar
[6] Hirsch J E 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 1834
Google Scholar
[7] Mucciolo E R, Chamon C, Marcus C M 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 146802
Google Scholar
[8] Hübner J, Rühle W W, Klude M, Hommel D, Bhat R D R, Sipe J E., Van Driel H M 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 216601
Google Scholar
[9] Ma Z, Wu R L, Yu Y B, Wang M 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 116 043706
Google Scholar
[10] Jiang P, Tao X, Hao H, Song L, Zheng X, Zhang L, Zeng Z 2017 2 D Mater. 4 035001
Google Scholar
[11] Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos S V, Grigorieva I V 2004 Science 306 666
Google Scholar
[12] Novoselov K S 2011 Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 837
Google Scholar
[13] Geim A K 2011 Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 851
Google Scholar
[14] Min S K, Kim W Y, Cho Y, Kim K S 2011 Nat. Nanotechnol. 6 162
Google Scholar
[15] Yazyev O V, Katsnelson M I 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 047209
Google Scholar
[16] Son Y W, Cohen M L, Louie S G 2006 Nature 444 347
Google Scholar
[17] Dutta S, Manna A K, Pati S K 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 096601
Google Scholar
[18] Tao X, Zhang L, Zheng X, Hao H, Wang X, Song L, Zeng Z, Guo H 2018 Nanoscale 10 174
Google Scholar
[19] Zhang Y T, Jiang H, Sun Q F, Xie X C 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 165404
Google Scholar
[20] Wang Z F, Liu F 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 99 042110
Google Scholar
[21] Zhou Y, Zheng X 2019 J. Phys. Condes. Matter 31 315301
Google Scholar
[22] Song L, Jin S, Liu Y, Yuan L, Yang Z, Jiang P, Zheng X 2020 Physica E 115 113684
Google Scholar
[23] Liu X B, Kou Z K, Mu S C 2015 Prog. Chem. 27 1566
[24] Fischbein M D, Drndic M 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 93 113107
Google Scholar
[25] Liu J, Cai H, Yu X X, Zhang K 2012 J. Phys. Chem. C 116 15741
Google Scholar
[26] Safron N S, Kim M, Gopalan P, Arnold M S 2012 Adv. Mater. 24 1041
Google Scholar
[27] Yan Y, Liang Q, Zhao H, Wu Q, Li B 2012 Phys. Lett. A 376 2425
Google Scholar
[28] Song L L, Zheng X H, Wang R L, Zeng Z 2010 J. Phys. Chem. C 114 12145
Google Scholar
[29] Zhang X, Yazyev O V, Feng J, Xie L, Tao C, Chen Y C, Jiao L, Pedramrazi Z, Zettl A, Louie S, Dai H, Dai H 2013 ACS Nano 7 198
Google Scholar
[30] Soler J M, Artacho E, Gale J D, García A, Junquera J, Ordejón P, Sánchez-Portal D 2002 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14 2745
Google Scholar
[31] Taylor J, Guo H, Wang J 2001 Phys. Rev. B 63 245407
Google Scholar
[32] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865
Google Scholar
[33] Rejec T, Ramšak A, Jefferson J H 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65 235301
Google Scholar
[34] Proetto C R 1991 Phys. Rev. B 44 9096
Google Scholar
-
图 1 (a) 引入反量子点的器件模型; (b) N1模型; (c) N2模型; (d) N3模型
Figure 1. (a) Device model with antidots; (b) model N1; (c) model N2; (d) model N3.
图 2 自旋相关透射谱 (a) N1模型; (b) N2模型; (c) N3模型. 本征铁磁态锯齿型石墨烯纳米带的(d) 透射谱, (e) 能带图和 (f) 自旋向上电子的本征态
Figure 2. Spin-dependent transmission spectra: (a) N1 model; (b) N2 model; (c) N3 model. (d) Transmission spectrum, (e) band structure and (f) eigenstates of the spin up band of the pristine FM-ZGNR.
图 3 (a) 本征, (b) N1, (c) N2, (d) N3模型在费米能级处的散射态
Figure 3. Scattering states of (a) pristine, (b) N1, (c) N2 and (d) N3 model at the Fermi level.
图 4 (a) N1, (b) N2, (c) N3模型在100 K下的自旋塞贝克系数; (d) N1, (e) N2, (f) N3模型在200 K下的自旋塞贝克系数; (g) N1, (h) N2, (i) N3模型在300 K下的自旋塞贝克系数
Figure 4. Spin-dependent Seebeck coefficient of (a) N1, (b) N2 and (c) N3 model at 100 K. Spin-dependent Seebeck coefficient of (d) N1, (e) N2 and (f) N3 model at 200 K. Spin-dependent Seebeck coefficient of (g) N1, (h) N2 and (i) N3 model at 300 K.
图 5 (a) N1, (b) N2, (c) N3模型在不同温度下的电荷流因子
${F_{\text{c}}}$ ; (d) N1, (e) N2, (f) N3模型在不同温度下的自旋流因子${F_{\text{s}}}$ Figure 5. Charge current factor
${F_{\text{c}}}$ of (a) N1, (b) N2 and (c) N3 model at different temperature. Spin current factor${F_{\text{s}}}$ of (d) N1, (e) N2 and (f) N3 model at different temperature.
图 6 不同模型的自旋相关透射谱 (a) 8-N2; (b) 8-N3; (c) 8-N4;(d) 10-N3; (e) 10-N4; (f) 10-N5
Figure 6. Spin-dependent transmission spectra of different models: (a) 8-N2; (b) 8-N3; (c) 8-N4; (d) 10-N3; (e) 10-N4; (f) 10-N5.
图 7 8-ZGNR和10-ZGNR在200 K下的纯自旋流因子与反量子点数量的关系
Figure 7. Pure spin current factor of 8-ZGNR and 10-ZGNR at 200 K.
-
[1] Wolf S A, Awschalom D D, Buhrman R A, Daughton J M, von Molnár S, Roukes M L, Chtchelkanova A Y, Treger D M 2001 Science 294 1488
Google Scholar
[2] Awschalom D D, Flatté M E 2007 Nat. Phys. 3 153
Google Scholar
[3] Mishchenko E G, Shytov A V, Halperin B I 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 226602
Google Scholar
[4] Tao X, Hao H, Wang X, Zheng X, Zeng Z 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 108 233106
Google Scholar
[5] Qing F, Sun X, Xie C 2005 Phys. Rev. B 72 245305
Google Scholar
[6] Hirsch J E 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 1834
Google Scholar
[7] Mucciolo E R, Chamon C, Marcus C M 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 146802
Google Scholar
[8] Hübner J, Rühle W W, Klude M, Hommel D, Bhat R D R, Sipe J E., Van Driel H M 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 216601
Google Scholar
[9] Ma Z, Wu R L, Yu Y B, Wang M 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 116 043706
Google Scholar
[10] Jiang P, Tao X, Hao H, Song L, Zheng X, Zhang L, Zeng Z 2017 2 D Mater. 4 035001
Google Scholar
[11] Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos S V, Grigorieva I V 2004 Science 306 666
Google Scholar
[12] Novoselov K S 2011 Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 837
Google Scholar
[13] Geim A K 2011 Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 851
Google Scholar
[14] Min S K, Kim W Y, Cho Y, Kim K S 2011 Nat. Nanotechnol. 6 162
Google Scholar
[15] Yazyev O V, Katsnelson M I 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 047209
Google Scholar
[16] Son Y W, Cohen M L, Louie S G 2006 Nature 444 347
Google Scholar
[17] Dutta S, Manna A K, Pati S K 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 096601
Google Scholar
[18] Tao X, Zhang L, Zheng X, Hao H, Wang X, Song L, Zeng Z, Guo H 2018 Nanoscale 10 174
Google Scholar
[19] Zhang Y T, Jiang H, Sun Q F, Xie X C 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 165404
Google Scholar
[20] Wang Z F, Liu F 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 99 042110
Google Scholar
[21] Zhou Y, Zheng X 2019 J. Phys. Condes. Matter 31 315301
Google Scholar
[22] Song L, Jin S, Liu Y, Yuan L, Yang Z, Jiang P, Zheng X 2020 Physica E 115 113684
Google Scholar
[23] Liu X B, Kou Z K, Mu S C 2015 Prog. Chem. 27 1566
[24] Fischbein M D, Drndic M 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 93 113107
Google Scholar
[25] Liu J, Cai H, Yu X X, Zhang K 2012 J. Phys. Chem. C 116 15741
Google Scholar
[26] Safron N S, Kim M, Gopalan P, Arnold M S 2012 Adv. Mater. 24 1041
Google Scholar
[27] Yan Y, Liang Q, Zhao H, Wu Q, Li B 2012 Phys. Lett. A 376 2425
Google Scholar
[28] Song L L, Zheng X H, Wang R L, Zeng Z 2010 J. Phys. Chem. C 114 12145
Google Scholar
[29] Zhang X, Yazyev O V, Feng J, Xie L, Tao C, Chen Y C, Jiao L, Pedramrazi Z, Zettl A, Louie S, Dai H, Dai H 2013 ACS Nano 7 198
Google Scholar
[30] Soler J M, Artacho E, Gale J D, García A, Junquera J, Ordejón P, Sánchez-Portal D 2002 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14 2745
Google Scholar
[31] Taylor J, Guo H, Wang J 2001 Phys. Rev. B 63 245407
Google Scholar
[32] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865
Google Scholar
[33] Rejec T, Ramšak A, Jefferson J H 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65 235301
Google Scholar
[34] Proetto C R 1991 Phys. Rev. B 44 9096
Google Scholar
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 3674
- PDF Downloads: 60
- Cited By: 0
