-
对于航空瞬变电磁的低频探地问题, 除了精度和效率需要考虑, 深地探测问题的复杂度也不容忽视, 特别是对于低频复杂问题存在异常体与背景间的多尺度效应. 为了模拟开域问题, 有限厚度区域的完全匹配层被用于截断计算域, 然而这也无形中增大了整个模型, 造成计算复杂度增加. 鉴于此, 提出了一种新的基于极限梯度提升(extreme gradient boosting, XGB)的完美匹配单层模型, 并将该模型集成到时域有限差分求解器中, 以进一步提高时域有限差分仿真的性能. 所提出的基于XGB的完美匹配单层模型通过特征注意力集成学习方法可以获得更高的精度, 同时占用更少的内存、消耗更少的时间. 此外, 由于该模型依托于传统机器学习模型, 因此它在模型训练的稳定性和轻量级方面具有显著的优势. 最后, 通过对航空瞬变电磁应用进行三维数值模拟, 验证了该方法的有效性和稳定性. 该模型不仅在精度、效率和问题复杂性方面具有优势, 而且还可以成功地集成到时域有限差分求解器中, 解决低频航空瞬变电磁问题.In addition to requiring the accuracy and computational efficiency for solving low-frequency subsurface sensing problem on the airborne transient electromagnetics (ATEMs), to the best of our knowledge, the complexity of subsurface sensing problems should also be considered in order to reduce more and more computational resources, particularly for a large-scale complicated multis-cale problem with a difference between background and targets. For simulating the open-domain, the finite-thickness perfectly matched layer is used to truncate the computational region, while the whole domain becomes larger so that the problem turns more complex. As a result, we propose a novel perfectly matched monolayer (PMM) model based on the extreme gradient boosting (XGB), which is selected and added to further improve the performance during the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulation. The proposed XGB-based PMM model can achieve higher accuracy by using the ensemble learning method of feature attention, and has less memory and time consumption at the same time. Besides, this model has significant advantages in terms of model training stability and its lightweight due to the fact that it relies on the characteristics of traditional machine learning models. Finally, three-dimensional numerical simulations of ATEM problems are carried out to prove the validity and stability of the proposal. The proposed model can not only achieve advantages in numerical accuracy, efficiency and problem complexity, but also be integrated into the FDTD solver to deal with the low-frequency ATEM problems.
-
Keywords:
- extreme gradient boosting /
- perfectly matched monolayer /
- machine learning /
- finite-difference time-domain
[1] Liu H, Zhao X, Yu Y, Qiu S, Ji Y 2023 IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 61 2002114Google Scholar
[2] Feng N, Zhang Y, Sun Q, Zhu J, Joines W, Liu Q 2018 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 66 2967Google Scholar
[3] Qi Y Z, Huang L, Zhangh J G, Fang G Y 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 234201 [齐有政, 黄玲, 张建国, 方广有 2013 62 234201]Google Scholar
Google ScholarQi Y Z, Huang L, Zhangh J G, Fang G Y 2013 Acta Phys. Sin.62 234201 [4] Chen J, Li J, Liu Q 2017 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 65 1896Google Scholar
[5] Mou C H, Chen J, Fan K H, Lu Y 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 184101 [牟春晖, 陈娟, 范凯航, 鲁艺 2022 71 184101]Google Scholar
Google ScholarMou C H, Chen J, Fan K H, Lu Y 2022 Acta Phys. Sin.71 184101 [6] Xie G D, Hou G L, Niu K K, Feng N X, Fang, M, Li Y S, Huang Z X 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 150201 [谢国大, 侯桂林, 牛凯坤, 冯乃星, 方明, 李迎松, 黄志祥 2023 72 150201]Google Scholar
Google ScholarXie G D, Hou G L, Niu K K, Feng N X, Fang, M, Li Y S, Huang Z X 2023 Acta Phys. Sin.72 150201 [7] Chen J 2018 J. Comput. Phys. 363 256Google Scholar
[8] Wang F, Wei B, Li L Q 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 104101 [王飞, 魏兵, 李林茜 2014 63 104101]Google Scholar
Google ScholarWang F, Wei B, Li L Q 2014 Acta Phys. Sin.63 104101 [9] Wang J, Yin W 2013 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 61 299Google Scholar
[10] Zhu X M, Ren X C, Guo L X 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 054101 [朱小敏, 任新成, 郭立新 2014 63 054101]Google Scholar
Google ScholarZhu X M, Ren X C, Guo L X 2014 Acta Phys. Sin.63 054101 [11] Zhang Y, Feng N, Wang L, Guan Z, Liu Q 2020 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 68 366Google Scholar
[12] Zhan Q, Zhuang M, Sun Q, Ren Q, Ren Y, Mao Y, Liu Q 2017 IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 55 5577Google Scholar
[13] Fang Y, Xi X, Wu J, Liu J, Pu Y 2016 IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 64 1957Google Scholar
[14] Fang Y, Xi X, Liu J, Pu Y, Zhao Y, Luo R 2018 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 66 6209Google Scholar
[15] Feng N, Yue Y, Liu Q 2015 IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 63 877Google Scholar
[16] Chen J, Wang J 2009 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 57 3375Google Scholar
[17] Yang S, Chen Z, Yu Y, Yin W 2012 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 60 1995Google Scholar
[18] Feng N, Zhang Y, Tian X, Zhu J, Joines W, Wang G 2019 IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 67 3260Google Scholar
[19] Feng N, Zhang Y, Wang G 2022 IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 70 1026Google Scholar
[20] Bishop C 2006 Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Springer) pp1–674
[21] Cai Y, Huang Y, Feng N, Huang Z 2023 IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 71 3284Google Scholar
[22] Feng N, Chen Y, Hong B, Huang Z 2023 IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 71 3294Google Scholar
[23] Li L, Ruan H, Liu C, Li Y, Shuang Y, Alù A, Qiu C, Cui T 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 1082Google Scholar
[24] Pérez-López D, López A, DasMahapatra P, Capmany J 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 6359Google Scholar
[25] Kim K, Ha I, Kim M, Choi J, Won P, Jo S, Ko S 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 2149Google Scholar
[26] Tang Z, Li S, Xu J, Zhang H 2023 Opt. Lett. 48 4416Google Scholar
[27] Tang Z, Xu J, Wang S, Zhang H 2023 Diamond Relat. Mater. 137 110091Google Scholar
[28] Yao H, Jiang L 2019 IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 18 192Google Scholar
[29] Feng N X, Chen Y S, Zhang Y X, Tong M S, Zeng Q S, Wang G P 2021 IEEE Microwave Wirel. Compon. Lett. 31 541Google Scholar
[30] Chen Y, Zhang Y, Wang H, Feng N, Yang L, Huang Z 2023 IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. DOI: 10.1109/TEMC.2023.3273724
[31] Feng N, Li J 2013 J. Comput. Phys. 232 318Google Scholar
[32] Feng N, Yue Y, Zhu C, Wan L, Liu Q 2015 J. Comput. Phys. 285 71Google Scholar
[33] Berenger J 1994 J. Comput. Phys. 114 185Google Scholar
[34] Chew W, Weedon W 1994 Microwave Opt. Technol. Lett. 7 599Google Scholar
[35] Kuzuoglu M, Mittra R 1996 IEEE Microwave Wirel. Compon. Lett. 6 447Google Scholar
[36] Roden J, Gedney S 2000 Microwave Opt. Technol. Lett. 27 334Google Scholar
[37] Becacha E, Petropoulus P, Gedney S 2004 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 52 1335Google Scholar
[38] Berenger J 2002 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 50 258Google Scholar
[39] Correia D, Jin J 2006 Microwave Opt. Technol. Lett. 48 2121Google Scholar
-
表 1 基于XGB的ABC模型算法
Table 1. XGB-based ABC algorithms.
算法 基于XGB的ABC模型 输入 训练集、验证集、测试集 初始化 初始化第一颗决策树$ {T_1} $, 并基于目标函数最小来计算决策树权重: $ \min O = -\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\sum\limits_{j = 1}^T {\frac{G}{{H + \lambda }}} + \gamma T $, $ {w_j} = - \displaystyle\frac{{{G_j}}}{{{H_j} + \lambda }} $ 初始化总模型并将第一棵数加入$ {F_1}(x) = {T_1} $ 初始化残差变量空间$ M $ 循环 计算总模型残差: $ L =\displaystyle \sum\limits_{j = 1}^T {\left[ {{G_j}{x_j} + \frac{1}{2}({H_j} + \lambda )x_j^2} \right]} + \gamma T $ 基于残差数据构建新的决策树$ {T_i} $: $ \min O = - \displaystyle\frac{1}{2}\sum\limits_{j = 1}^T {\frac{G}{{H + \lambda }}} + \gamma T $, $ {w_j} = -\displaystyle \frac{{{G_j}}}{{{H_j} + \lambda }} $ 更新总模型: $ {F_{i + 1}}(x) = {F_i}(x) + {T_i}(x) $ 在验证集中测试模型 停止 收敛或达到预设迭代次数 表 2 以0.04 s为周期的计算时间
Table 2. Computational time for 0.04 s as a period
不同实现方法 CPU 所耗
时间/s具有10层PML截断的传统FDTD方法 9711.21 具有5层CFS-PML截断的隐式FDTD方法 342.06 内嵌复频率因子的深度可微森林
完全匹配单层模型115.21 内嵌复频率因子的深度决策树神经
图灵机模型114.51 内嵌双极因子的梯度增强决策树
完全匹配单层模型112.33 -
[1] Liu H, Zhao X, Yu Y, Qiu S, Ji Y 2023 IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 61 2002114Google Scholar
[2] Feng N, Zhang Y, Sun Q, Zhu J, Joines W, Liu Q 2018 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 66 2967Google Scholar
[3] Qi Y Z, Huang L, Zhangh J G, Fang G Y 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 234201 [齐有政, 黄玲, 张建国, 方广有 2013 62 234201]Google Scholar
Google ScholarQi Y Z, Huang L, Zhangh J G, Fang G Y 2013 Acta Phys. Sin.62 234201 [4] Chen J, Li J, Liu Q 2017 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 65 1896Google Scholar
[5] Mou C H, Chen J, Fan K H, Lu Y 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 184101 [牟春晖, 陈娟, 范凯航, 鲁艺 2022 71 184101]Google Scholar
Google ScholarMou C H, Chen J, Fan K H, Lu Y 2022 Acta Phys. Sin.71 184101 [6] Xie G D, Hou G L, Niu K K, Feng N X, Fang, M, Li Y S, Huang Z X 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 150201 [谢国大, 侯桂林, 牛凯坤, 冯乃星, 方明, 李迎松, 黄志祥 2023 72 150201]Google Scholar
Google ScholarXie G D, Hou G L, Niu K K, Feng N X, Fang, M, Li Y S, Huang Z X 2023 Acta Phys. Sin.72 150201 [7] Chen J 2018 J. Comput. Phys. 363 256Google Scholar
[8] Wang F, Wei B, Li L Q 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 104101 [王飞, 魏兵, 李林茜 2014 63 104101]Google Scholar
Google ScholarWang F, Wei B, Li L Q 2014 Acta Phys. Sin.63 104101 [9] Wang J, Yin W 2013 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 61 299Google Scholar
[10] Zhu X M, Ren X C, Guo L X 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 054101 [朱小敏, 任新成, 郭立新 2014 63 054101]Google Scholar
Google ScholarZhu X M, Ren X C, Guo L X 2014 Acta Phys. Sin.63 054101 [11] Zhang Y, Feng N, Wang L, Guan Z, Liu Q 2020 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 68 366Google Scholar
[12] Zhan Q, Zhuang M, Sun Q, Ren Q, Ren Y, Mao Y, Liu Q 2017 IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 55 5577Google Scholar
[13] Fang Y, Xi X, Wu J, Liu J, Pu Y 2016 IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 64 1957Google Scholar
[14] Fang Y, Xi X, Liu J, Pu Y, Zhao Y, Luo R 2018 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 66 6209Google Scholar
[15] Feng N, Yue Y, Liu Q 2015 IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 63 877Google Scholar
[16] Chen J, Wang J 2009 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 57 3375Google Scholar
[17] Yang S, Chen Z, Yu Y, Yin W 2012 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 60 1995Google Scholar
[18] Feng N, Zhang Y, Tian X, Zhu J, Joines W, Wang G 2019 IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 67 3260Google Scholar
[19] Feng N, Zhang Y, Wang G 2022 IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 70 1026Google Scholar
[20] Bishop C 2006 Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Springer) pp1–674
[21] Cai Y, Huang Y, Feng N, Huang Z 2023 IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 71 3284Google Scholar
[22] Feng N, Chen Y, Hong B, Huang Z 2023 IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 71 3294Google Scholar
[23] Li L, Ruan H, Liu C, Li Y, Shuang Y, Alù A, Qiu C, Cui T 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 1082Google Scholar
[24] Pérez-López D, López A, DasMahapatra P, Capmany J 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 6359Google Scholar
[25] Kim K, Ha I, Kim M, Choi J, Won P, Jo S, Ko S 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 2149Google Scholar
[26] Tang Z, Li S, Xu J, Zhang H 2023 Opt. Lett. 48 4416Google Scholar
[27] Tang Z, Xu J, Wang S, Zhang H 2023 Diamond Relat. Mater. 137 110091Google Scholar
[28] Yao H, Jiang L 2019 IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 18 192Google Scholar
[29] Feng N X, Chen Y S, Zhang Y X, Tong M S, Zeng Q S, Wang G P 2021 IEEE Microwave Wirel. Compon. Lett. 31 541Google Scholar
[30] Chen Y, Zhang Y, Wang H, Feng N, Yang L, Huang Z 2023 IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. DOI: 10.1109/TEMC.2023.3273724
[31] Feng N, Li J 2013 J. Comput. Phys. 232 318Google Scholar
[32] Feng N, Yue Y, Zhu C, Wan L, Liu Q 2015 J. Comput. Phys. 285 71Google Scholar
[33] Berenger J 1994 J. Comput. Phys. 114 185Google Scholar
[34] Chew W, Weedon W 1994 Microwave Opt. Technol. Lett. 7 599Google Scholar
[35] Kuzuoglu M, Mittra R 1996 IEEE Microwave Wirel. Compon. Lett. 6 447Google Scholar
[36] Roden J, Gedney S 2000 Microwave Opt. Technol. Lett. 27 334Google Scholar
[37] Becacha E, Petropoulus P, Gedney S 2004 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 52 1335Google Scholar
[38] Berenger J 2002 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 50 258Google Scholar
[39] Correia D, Jin J 2006 Microwave Opt. Technol. Lett. 48 2121Google Scholar
计量
- 文章访问数: 1899
- PDF下载量: 178
- 被引次数: 0