搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

慢波结构爆炸发射对高功率太赫兹表面波振荡器的影响

赵文娟 陈再高 郭伟杰

引用本文:
Citation:

慢波结构爆炸发射对高功率太赫兹表面波振荡器的影响

赵文娟, 陈再高, 郭伟杰

Influence of slow wave structure explosive emission on high-power surface wave oscillator

Zhao Wen-Juan, Chen Zai-Gao, Guo Wei-Jie
PDF
导出引用
  • 随着真空电子学器件的工作频率达到太赫兹波段, 表面波振荡器的横截面尺寸变小, 慢波结构的加工精度难以得到保证, 同时由于表面波振荡器的电磁场集中在慢波结构表面, 在高电压工作情况下, 太赫兹波段的表面波振荡器慢波结构爆炸发射电子会影响器件的工作特性. 本文分析了高电压工作情况下0.14 THz表面波振荡器慢波结构中电场的分布特性, 研究表明, 在慢波结构区域沿着轴线方向上存在电场幅度的包络分布, 在慢波结构中心位置处靠近慢波结构内半径处电场的幅度最大, 最易爆炸发射产生电子, 采用粒子模拟软件UNIPIC模拟了慢波结构处爆炸发射的电子对器件工作特性的影响, 同时考虑了电子回流所产生的二次电子倍增效应, 数值模拟结果表明, 慢波结构电子产生会导致器件的输出功率下降, 从数十兆瓦下降到兆瓦量级.
    As the working frequency of a vacuum electron device reaches the terahertz frequency band, the cross section of the surface wave oscillators (SWO) becomes very small, and the micro-fabrication precision of the device cannot be guaranteed, at the same time, because the electromagnetic field of SWO concentrates on the inner surface in slow wave structure, when the working voltage of surface wave oscillator is very high, the explosive emission probability of the slow wave structure increases greatly, and the explosive emission can influence the working characteristic of the device. This paper analyses the distributing property of the electrical field in the slow wave structure of 0.14 THz SWO. Parameters of the SWO under study are as follows: working voltage is 312 kV, explosive emitted current is 1.67 kA, periodic length of the slow wave structure is 0.7 mm, width of the slot is 0.4 mm, and the height of it is 0.3 mm; cold-test results indicate that the amplitude of the electrical field in the slow wave structure varies sinusoidally; the amplitude of the electrical field reaches a maximum value in the middle of the slow wave structure near its inner surface, and the explosive electron emission can occur most possibly in this position, because the electrical field in the slow wave structure varies with very high working frequency. The explosive emitted electron may bombard back the slow wave structure, and the secondary electrons will be emitted at a certain probability, for which the formula proposed by Vaughan is used to compute the secondary emission yield, and this formula is implemented in the self-developed particle-in-cell code UNIPIC; while the code is used to simulate 0.14 THz SWO with explosive emission in the slow wave structure. In the simulation, the slow wave structure multipactor discharge induced by electrons is also considered; the phase space of the electrons emitted from the slow wave structure shows that the energy of secondary electrons is below 5 keV, so the validity for secondary electron yield is affirmed. Numerical simulation results indicate that because the emitted electrons from the slow wave structure change the distribution character of the electrical field in the slow wave structure, especially the amplitude of the electrical field in the middle of the slow wave structure, the beam-wave interaction is weakened, and as a result, output power decreases from about 22.6 megawatts to only 1.89 megawatts.
    [1]

    Benford J, Swegle J 1992 High Power Microwaves (Boston: Artech House) ch. 6

    [2]

    Insepov Z, Norem J, Vetizer S, Mahalingam S 2011 AIP Conf. Proc. 1406, Newport, USA, June 1-3, 2011 p523

    [3]

    James Benford, Gregory Benford 1997 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 25 311

    [4]

    Hegeler F, Grabowski C, Schamiloglu E 1998 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 26 275

    [5]

    Norem J, Insepov Z, Huang D, Mahalingam S, Veitzer S 2010 AIP Conf. Proc. 1222 Chicago, USA, July 20-25, 2009 p348

    [6]

    Dong C, Bao R M, Zhao K, Xu C H, Jin W J, Zhong S X 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 127802

    [7]

    Booske J H 2008 Phys. Plasmas 15 055502

    [8]

    Wang G Q, Wang J G, Li X Z, Fan R Y, Wang X Z, Wang X F, Tong C J 2010 Acta Phys. Sin. 59 8459 (in Chinese) [王光强, 王建国, 李小泽, 范如玉, 王行舟, 王雪锋, 童长江 2010 59 8459]

    [9]

    Wang G Q, Wang J G, Tong C J, Li X Z, Li S, Wang X F, Lu X C 2013 Phys. Plasmas 20 043105

    [10]

    Li X Z, Wang J G, Sun J, Song Z M, Ye H, Zhang Y C, Zhang L J, Zhang L G 2013 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 60 2931

    [11]

    Li X Z, Wang J G, Song Z M, Chen C H, Sun J, Zhang X W, Zhang Y C 2012 Phys. Plasmas 19 083111

    [12]

    Wang J G, Wang Y, Zhang D H 2006 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 34 681

    [13]

    Wang J G, Zhang D H, Liu C L, Li Y D, Wang Y, Wang H G, Qiao H L Li X Z 2009 Phys. Plasmas 16 033108

    [14]

    Wang J G, Chen Z G, Wang Y, Zhang D H, Liu C L, Li Y D, Wang H G, Qiao H L, Fu M Y, Yuan Y 2010 Phys. Plasmas 17 073107

    [15]

    Rodney J, Vaughan M 1993 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 40 830

    [16]

    Rodney J, Vaughan M 1989 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 36 1963

    [17]

    Furman M A, Pivi M T F 2003 SLAC-PUB-9912

    [18]

    Cai L B, Wang J G 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 3268 (in Chinese) [蔡利兵, 王建国 2009 58 3268]

    [19]

    Wang J G, Cai L B, Zhu X Q, Wang Y, Xuan C 2010 Phys. Plasmas 17 063503

  • [1]

    Benford J, Swegle J 1992 High Power Microwaves (Boston: Artech House) ch. 6

    [2]

    Insepov Z, Norem J, Vetizer S, Mahalingam S 2011 AIP Conf. Proc. 1406, Newport, USA, June 1-3, 2011 p523

    [3]

    James Benford, Gregory Benford 1997 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 25 311

    [4]

    Hegeler F, Grabowski C, Schamiloglu E 1998 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 26 275

    [5]

    Norem J, Insepov Z, Huang D, Mahalingam S, Veitzer S 2010 AIP Conf. Proc. 1222 Chicago, USA, July 20-25, 2009 p348

    [6]

    Dong C, Bao R M, Zhao K, Xu C H, Jin W J, Zhong S X 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 127802

    [7]

    Booske J H 2008 Phys. Plasmas 15 055502

    [8]

    Wang G Q, Wang J G, Li X Z, Fan R Y, Wang X Z, Wang X F, Tong C J 2010 Acta Phys. Sin. 59 8459 (in Chinese) [王光强, 王建国, 李小泽, 范如玉, 王行舟, 王雪锋, 童长江 2010 59 8459]

    [9]

    Wang G Q, Wang J G, Tong C J, Li X Z, Li S, Wang X F, Lu X C 2013 Phys. Plasmas 20 043105

    [10]

    Li X Z, Wang J G, Sun J, Song Z M, Ye H, Zhang Y C, Zhang L J, Zhang L G 2013 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 60 2931

    [11]

    Li X Z, Wang J G, Song Z M, Chen C H, Sun J, Zhang X W, Zhang Y C 2012 Phys. Plasmas 19 083111

    [12]

    Wang J G, Wang Y, Zhang D H 2006 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 34 681

    [13]

    Wang J G, Zhang D H, Liu C L, Li Y D, Wang Y, Wang H G, Qiao H L Li X Z 2009 Phys. Plasmas 16 033108

    [14]

    Wang J G, Chen Z G, Wang Y, Zhang D H, Liu C L, Li Y D, Wang H G, Qiao H L, Fu M Y, Yuan Y 2010 Phys. Plasmas 17 073107

    [15]

    Rodney J, Vaughan M 1993 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 40 830

    [16]

    Rodney J, Vaughan M 1989 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 36 1963

    [17]

    Furman M A, Pivi M T F 2003 SLAC-PUB-9912

    [18]

    Cai L B, Wang J G 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 3268 (in Chinese) [蔡利兵, 王建国 2009 58 3268]

    [19]

    Wang J G, Cai L B, Zhu X Q, Wang Y, Xuan C 2010 Phys. Plasmas 17 063503

  • [1] 骆新耀, 薛宇哲, 徐彻, 杜创洲, 刘庆想. 基于T形四周期谐振慢波结构的X波段高功率微波产生技术的理论与仿真.  , 2024, 73(9): 094101. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231921
    [2] 任泽平, 陈再高, 陈剑楠, 乔海亮. 频率色散表面阻抗对真空电子太赫兹源的影响.  , 2020, 69(4): 040701. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191488
    [3] 王航天, 赵海慧, 温良恭, 吴晓君, 聂天晓, 赵巍胜. 高性能太赫兹发射: 从拓扑绝缘体到拓扑自旋电子.  , 2020, 69(20): 200704. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200680
    [4] 左剑, 张亮亮, 巩辰, 张存林. 太赫兹片上系统和基于微纳结构的太赫兹超宽谱源的研究进展.  , 2016, 65(1): 010704. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.010704
    [5] 傅涛, 杨梓强, 欧阳征标. 等离子体填充金属光子晶体慢波结构色散特性研究.  , 2015, 64(17): 174205. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.174205
    [6] 郭伟杰, 陈再高, 蔡利兵, 王光强, 程国新. 0.14 THz双环超材料慢波结构表面波振荡器数值研究.  , 2015, 64(7): 070702. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.070702
    [7] 陈再高, 王建国, 王玥, 张殿辉, 乔海亮. 欧姆损耗对太赫兹频段同轴表面波振荡器的影响.  , 2015, 64(7): 070703. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.070703
    [8] 王光强, 王建国, 李爽, 王雪锋, 陆希成, 宋志敏. 0.34 THz大功率过模表面波振荡器研究.  , 2015, 64(5): 050703. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.050703
    [9] 王兵, 文光俊, 王文祥. 同轴交错圆盘加载波导慢波结构高频特性的研究.  , 2014, 63(22): 224101. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.224101
    [10] 陈再高, 王建国, 王光强, 李爽, 王玥, 张殿辉, 乔海亮. 0.14太赫兹同轴表面波振荡器研究.  , 2014, 63(11): 110703. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.110703
    [11] 韦朴, 周明干, 朱露, 张劲, 王雪峰, 吕东亚, 陈宁, 杨明华, 孙小菡. 螺旋线慢波结构夹持性能测试方法研究.  , 2013, 62(9): 094401. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.094401
    [12] 王光强, 王建国, 李爽, 王雪锋, 童长江, 陆希成, 郭伟杰. 0.14THz过模表面波振荡器的模式分析.  , 2013, 62(15): 150701. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.150701
    [13] 李小泽, 滕雁, 王建国, 宋志敏, 张黎军, 张余川, 叶虎. 过模结构表面波振荡器模式选择.  , 2013, 62(8): 084103. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.084103
    [14] 李爽, 王建国, 童长江, 王光强, 陆希成, 王雪锋. 大功率0.34 THz辐射源中慢波结构的优化设计.  , 2013, 62(12): 120703. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.120703
    [15] 刘洋, 徐进, 许雄, 沈飞, 魏彦玉, 黄民智, 唐涛, 王文祥, 宫玉彬. V形曲折矩形槽慢波结构的研究.  , 2012, 61(15): 154208. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.154208
    [16] 刘维浩, 张雅鑫, 胡旻, 周俊, 刘盛纲. 基于场致发射阴极阵列的太赫兹源的物理机理研究.  , 2012, 61(12): 127901. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.127901
    [17] 易红霞, 肖刘, 刘濮鲲, 郝保良, 李飞, 李国超. 基于电子注可回收能力的空间行波管慢波结构的优化设计.  , 2011, 60(6): 068403. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.068403
    [18] 高鹏, Booske John H., 杨中海, 李斌, 徐立, 何俊, 宫玉彬, 田忠. 太赫兹折叠波导行波管再生反馈振荡器非线性理论与模拟.  , 2010, 59(12): 8484-8489. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.8484
    [19] 路志刚, 魏彦玉, 宫玉彬, 吴周淼, 王文祥. 具有任意槽的矩形波导栅慢波结构高频特性的研究.  , 2007, 56(6): 3318-3323. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.3318
    [20] 岳玲娜, 王文祥, 魏彦玉, 宫玉彬. 同轴任意槽形周期圆波导慢波结构色散特性的研究.  , 2005, 54(9): 4223-4228. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.4223
计量
  • 文章访问数:  5601
  • PDF下载量:  147
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-01-29
  • 修回日期:  2015-03-13
  • 刊出日期:  2015-08-05

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map