搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

玻色-费米超流混合体系中的相互作用调制隧穿动力学

徐红萍 贺真真 鱼自发 高吉明

引用本文:
Citation:

玻色-费米超流混合体系中的相互作用调制隧穿动力学

徐红萍, 贺真真, 鱼自发, 高吉明

Interaction-modulated tunneling dynamics of a mixture of Bose-Fermi superfluid

Xu Hong-Ping, He Zhen-Zhen, Yu Zi-Fa, Gao Ji-Ming
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 研究了玻色-费米超流混合体系中的相互作用调制隧穿动力学特性, 其中玻色子位于对称双势阱中, 费米子位于对称双势阱中心的简谐势阱中. 采用双模近似方法得到描述双势阱玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚的动力学特性方程组, 并将其与简谐势阱中分子玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚的Gross-Pitaevskii方程进行耦合. 通过对不同参数下玻色-费米混合体系中的隧穿现象进行数值研究, 发现简谐势阱中费米子与双势阱中玻色子的相互作用使双势阱玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚的隧穿动力学特性更加丰富. 不但驱使双势阱中玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚从类约瑟夫森振荡转变为宏观量子自囚禁, 而且宏观量子自囚禁表现为三种不同的形式: 相位与时间呈负相关并随时间单调减小的自囚禁、 相位随时间演化有界的自囚禁以及相位与时间呈正相关并随时间单调增大的自囚禁.
    In this paper, we study the interaction-modulated tunneling dynamics of a Bose-Fermi superfluid mixture, where a Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) with weak repulsive interaction is confined in a symmetric deep double-well potential and an equally populated two-component Fermi gas in a harmonic potential symmetrically is positioned in the center of the double-well potential. The tunneling between the two wells is modulated by fermions trapped in a harmonic potential. When the temperature is adequately low and the bosonic particle number is adequately large, we can employ the mean-field theory to describe the evolution of the BEC in the double-well potential through the time-dependent Gross-Pitaevskii equation. For the Fermi gas in the harmonic potential trap, we consider the case where the inter-fermion interaction is tuned on the deep Bose-Einstein condensate of the inter-fermion Feshbach resonance, where two fermions of spin-up and spin-down form a two-body bound state. Within the regime, the Fermi gas is well described by a condensate of these fermionic dimers, and hence can be simulated as well by a Gross-Pitaevskii equation of dimers. The inter-species interactions couple the dynamics of the two species, which results in interesting features in the tunneling oscillations. The dynamic equations of the BEC in the double-well potential is described by a two-mode approximation. Coupling it with time-dependent Gross-Pitaevskii equation of the harmonically potential trapped molecular BEC, we numerically investigate the dynamical evolution of the Boson-Fermi hybrid system under different initial conditions. It is found that the interaction among fermions in a harmonic potential leads to strong non-linearity in the oscillations of the bosons in the double-well potential and enriches the tunneling dynamics of the bosons. Especially, it strengthens macroscopic quantum self-trapping. And the macroscopic quantum self-trapping can be expressed in three forms: the phase tends to be negative and monotonically decreases with time, the phase evolves with time, and the phase tends to be positive and increases monotonically with time. This means that it is possible the tunneling dynamics of the BEC in double-well potential is adjustable. Our results can be verified experimentally in a Bose-Fermi superfluid mixture by varying different interaction parameters via Feshbach resonance and confinement-induced resonance.
      通信作者: 徐红萍, xhpwlx8@126.com
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 11764039, 11305132, 11274255)资助的课题
      Corresponding author: Xu Hong-Ping, xhpwlx8@126.com
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11764039, 11305132, 11274255).
    [1]

    Anderson M H, Ensher J R, Matthews M R, Wieman C E, Cornell E A 1995 Science 269 198Google Scholar

    [2]

    Hadzibabic Z, Stan C A, Dieckmann K, Gupta S, Ketterle W 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 160401Google Scholar

    [3]

    Wu C H, Santiago I, Park J W, Ahmadi P, Zwierlein M W 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 011601Google Scholar

    [4]

    Stan C A, Zwierlein M W, Schunck C H, Raupach S M F, Ketterle W 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 143001Google Scholar

    [5]

    Deh B, Marzok C, Zimmermann C, Courteille P W 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 010701

    [6]

    陈海霞 2009 博士学位论文 (太原: 山西大学)

    Chen HX 2009 Ph. D. Dissertation (Taiyuan: Shanxi University) (in Chinese)

    [7]

    王汉权 2012 玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚中的量化涡旋及其动力学 (北京: 科学出版社)

    Wang H Q 2012 Quantized Vortex States and Dynamics for Bose-Einstein Condensates (Beijing: Science Press) (in Chinese)

    [8]

    Wang Y S, Li Z Y, Zhou Z W, Diao X F 2014 Phys. Lett. A 378 48Google Scholar

    [9]

    Karpiuk T, Brewczyk M, Ospelkaus-Schwarzer S, Bongs K, Rzazewski K 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 100401Google Scholar

    [10]

    Titvinidze I, Snoek M, Hofstetter W 2009 Phys. Rev. B 79 144506Google Scholar

    [11]

    Chen Q J, Wang J B, Sun L, Yu Y 2020 Chin. Phys. Lett. 37 053702Google Scholar

    [12]

    Yang S F, Zhou T W, Li C, Yang K X, Zhai Y Y, Yue X G, Chen X Z 2020 Chin. Phys. Lett. 37 040301Google Scholar

    [13]

    Cheng Y, Adhikari S K 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 023632Google Scholar

    [14]

    Wang J B, Pan J S, Cui X L, Yi W 2020 Chin. Phys. Lett. 37 076701Google Scholar

    [15]

    Wu B, Niu Q 2000 Phys. Rev. A 61 023402Google Scholar

    [16]

    Ye D F, Fu L B, Jie L 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 013402Google Scholar

    [17]

    Raghavan S, Smerzi A, Fantoni S, Shenoy S R 1999 Phys. Rev. A 59 620

    [18]

    Maraj M, Wang J B, Pan J S, Yi W 2017 Eur. Phys. J. D 71 300Google Scholar

    [19]

    Niu Z X, Zhang X, Zhang W 2019 Eur. Phys. J. D 73 112Google Scholar

    [20]

    Adhikari S K, Lu H, Pu H 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 063607Google Scholar

    [21]

    Qi P T, Duan W S 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 033627Google Scholar

    [22]

    Milburn G J, Corney J, Wright E M, Walls D F 1997 Phys. Rev. A 55 4318Google Scholar

    [23]

    Xiong B, Gong J, Pu H, Bao W, Li B 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 013626Google Scholar

    [24]

    李振威 2008 量子光学学报 14 426Google Scholar

    Li Z W 2008 J. Quantum Opt. 14 426Google Scholar

    [25]

    Wang Y S, Long P, Zhang B, Zhang H 2017 Can. J. Phys. 95 622Google Scholar

    [26]

    Erdmann J, Mistakidis S I, Schmelcher P 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 053614Google Scholar

    [27]

    Caballero-Benítez S F, Ostrovskaya E A, Gulácsí M, Kivshar Y S 2009 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 42 215308Google Scholar

  • 图 1  0-模时双势阱玻色子初始粒子布居数差$ {Z_{\text{b}}}(t) $和相对相位$ {\phi _{\text{b}}}(t) $随时间$ t $的变化关系, 以及${Z_{\text{b}}}\text{-}{\phi _{\text{b}}}$相图 (a)$ {N_{\text{b}}} = 0.3{N_{\text{f}}} $; (b)$ {N_{\text{b}}} = {N_{\text{f}}} $; (c)$ {N_{\text{b}}} = 2.2{N_{\text{f}}} $; (d)$ {N_{\text{b}}} = 5.5{N_{\text{f}}} $; (e)$ {N_{\text{b}}} = 7{N_{\text{f}}} $. (a)—(e)图中的初始条件为$ {Z_{\text{b}}}(0) = 0.6 $, $ {\phi _{\text{b}}}(0) = 0 $, $ {N_{\text{f}}} = 260 $, $ {g_{\text{b}}} = 2 \times {10^{ - 4}} $, $ {g_{\text{f}}} = 2 \times {10^{ - 4}} $, $ {g_{{\text{bf}}}} = 2 \times {10^{ - 2}} $

    Fig. 1.  For zero mode, population imbalance change with time $ t $, phase change with $ t $ and population imbalance change with the phase of the double-well: (a)$ {N_{\text{b}}} = 0.3{N_{\text{f}}} $; (b)$ {N_{\text{b}}} = {N_{\text{f}}} $; (c)$ {N_{\text{b}}} = 2.2{N_{\text{f}}} $; (d)$ {N_{\text{b}}} = 5.5{N_{\text{f}}} $; (e)$ {N_{\text{b}}} = 7{N_{\text{f}}} $. For (a)–(e) figures the initial condition is set to $ {Z_{\text{b}}}(0) = 0.6 $, $ {\phi _{\text{b}}}(0) = 0 $, $ {N_{\text{f}}} = 260 $, $ {g_{\text{b}}} = 2 \times {10^{ - 4}} $, $ {g_{\text{f}}} = 2 \times {10^{ - 4}} $, $ {g_{{\text{bf}}}} = 2 \times {10^{ - 2}} $.

    图 2  $ {\text{π }} $-模时双势阱玻色子初始粒子布居数差$ {Z_{\text{b}}}(t) $和相对相位$ {\phi _{\text{b}}}(t) $随时间$ t $的演化, 以及$ {Z_{\text{b}}}{\text{ - }}{\phi _{\text{b}}} $相图 (a)$ {N_{\text{b}}} = 1/30{N_{\text{f}}} $; (b)$ {N_{\text{b}}} = 0.1{N_{\text{f}}} $; (c) ${{N}}_{\text{b}}={{N}}_{\text{f}}$; (d)$ {N_{\text{b}}} = 2{N_{\text{f}}} $; (e) $ {\text{N}}_{\text{b}}=\text{4}{\text{N}}_{\text{f}} $. (a)—(e)图中的初始条件为$ {Z_{\text{b}}}(0) = 0.4 $, $ {\phi _{\text{b}}}(0) = {\text{π }} $, $ {N_{\text{f}}} = 300 $, ${g_{\text{b}}} = $$ 2 \times {10^{ - 4}}$, $ {g_{\text{f}}} = 2 \times {10^{ - 4}} $, $ {g_{{\text{bf}}}} = 1 \times {10^{ - 2}} $.

    Fig. 2.  For $ {\text{π }} $ mode, population imbalance change with time $ t $, phase change with $ t $ and population imbalance change with the phase of the double-well: (a)$ {N_{\text{b}}} = 1/30{N_{\text{f}}} $; (b)$ {N_{\text{b}}} = 0.1{N_{\text{f}}} $; (c)$ {N_{\text{b}}} = {N_{\text{f}}} $; (d)$ {N_{\text{b}}} = 2{N_{\text{f}}} $; (e)$ {N_{\text{b}}} = 4{N_{\text{f}}} $. For (a)–(e) figures the initial condition is set to $ {Z_{\text{b}}}(0) = 0.4 $, $ {\phi _{\text{b}}}(0) = {\text{π }} $, $ {N_{\text{f}}} = 300 $, ${g_{\text{b}}} = $$ 2 \times {10^{ - 4}}$, $ {g_{\text{f}}} = 2 \times {10^{ - 4}} $, $ {g_{{\text{bf}}}} = 1 \times {10^{ - 2}} $.

    图 3  ${\phi _{\text{b}}}{\text{-}}{Z_{\text{b}}}$平面内的相图. 费米子数$ {N_{\text{f}}} = 300 $, 其中图(a)—(f)中, $ {N}_{\text{b}}=10, \text{ }30, \text{ }300, $$ 600, \text{ }1800, \text{ }2100 $. 红色线表示${\phi _{\text{b}}}(0) = $$ 0$时的演化轨迹, 黑色线表示$ {\phi _{\text{b}}}(0) = {\text{π }} $时的演化轨迹, 蓝色的点线表示0-模时相轨迹转变的临界值, 绿色的点线表示$ \pi $-模时相轨迹转变的临界值.

    Fig. 3.  Phase diagram in the ${\phi _{\text{b}}}\text{-}{Z_{\text{b}}}$. The number of fermions is $ {N_{\text{f}}} = 300 $ with (a)–(f)$ {N_{\text{b}}} = 10, {\text{ }}30, {\text{ }}300, {\text{ }}600, {\text{ }}1800, {\text{ }}2100 $. Trajectories with $ {\phi _{\text{b}}}(0) = 0 $ are depicted in red while those with $ {\phi _{\text{b}}}(0) = {\text{π }} $ are depicted in black. The blue dot line indicates the critical value of phase trajectory transition at 0 phase mode. The green dot line indicates the critical value of phase trajectory transition at $ {\text{π }} $ phase mode.

    图 4  (a), (c) 0-模和(b), (d)$ {\text{π }} $-模时, ${N_{\text{b}}}/{N_{\text{f}}}{\text{-}}{g_{\text{b}}}$${N_{\text{b}}}/{N_{\text{f}}}{\text{-}}{g_{{\text{bf}}}}$平面内的相图, 其中(a), (b)参数为$ {g_{\text{f}}} = 2 \times {10^{ - 4}} $, ${g_{{\text{bf}}}} = 2 \times $$ {10^{ - 2}}$; (c), (d)参数为$ {g_{\text{b}}} = 2 \times {10^{ - 4}} $, $ {g_{\text{f}}} = 2 \times {10^{ - 4}} $

    Fig. 4.  For (a), (c) zero mode and (b), (d)$ {\text{π }} $ mode, the phase diagram in the ${N_{\text{b}}}/{N_{\text{f}}}{\text{-}}{g_{\text{b}}}$ and ${N_{\text{b}}}/{N_{\text{f}}}{\text{-}}{g_{{\text{bf}}}}$ plane with (a), (b) $ {g_{\text{f}}} = 2 \times {10^{ - 4}} $, $ {g_{{\text{bf}}}} = 2 \times {10^{ - 2}} $ and (c), (d) $ {g_{\text{b}}} = 2 \times {10^{ - 4}} $, $ {g_{\text{f}}} = 2 \times {10^{ - 4}} $.

    Baidu
  • [1]

    Anderson M H, Ensher J R, Matthews M R, Wieman C E, Cornell E A 1995 Science 269 198Google Scholar

    [2]

    Hadzibabic Z, Stan C A, Dieckmann K, Gupta S, Ketterle W 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 160401Google Scholar

    [3]

    Wu C H, Santiago I, Park J W, Ahmadi P, Zwierlein M W 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 011601Google Scholar

    [4]

    Stan C A, Zwierlein M W, Schunck C H, Raupach S M F, Ketterle W 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 143001Google Scholar

    [5]

    Deh B, Marzok C, Zimmermann C, Courteille P W 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 010701

    [6]

    陈海霞 2009 博士学位论文 (太原: 山西大学)

    Chen HX 2009 Ph. D. Dissertation (Taiyuan: Shanxi University) (in Chinese)

    [7]

    王汉权 2012 玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚中的量化涡旋及其动力学 (北京: 科学出版社)

    Wang H Q 2012 Quantized Vortex States and Dynamics for Bose-Einstein Condensates (Beijing: Science Press) (in Chinese)

    [8]

    Wang Y S, Li Z Y, Zhou Z W, Diao X F 2014 Phys. Lett. A 378 48Google Scholar

    [9]

    Karpiuk T, Brewczyk M, Ospelkaus-Schwarzer S, Bongs K, Rzazewski K 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 100401Google Scholar

    [10]

    Titvinidze I, Snoek M, Hofstetter W 2009 Phys. Rev. B 79 144506Google Scholar

    [11]

    Chen Q J, Wang J B, Sun L, Yu Y 2020 Chin. Phys. Lett. 37 053702Google Scholar

    [12]

    Yang S F, Zhou T W, Li C, Yang K X, Zhai Y Y, Yue X G, Chen X Z 2020 Chin. Phys. Lett. 37 040301Google Scholar

    [13]

    Cheng Y, Adhikari S K 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 023632Google Scholar

    [14]

    Wang J B, Pan J S, Cui X L, Yi W 2020 Chin. Phys. Lett. 37 076701Google Scholar

    [15]

    Wu B, Niu Q 2000 Phys. Rev. A 61 023402Google Scholar

    [16]

    Ye D F, Fu L B, Jie L 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 013402Google Scholar

    [17]

    Raghavan S, Smerzi A, Fantoni S, Shenoy S R 1999 Phys. Rev. A 59 620

    [18]

    Maraj M, Wang J B, Pan J S, Yi W 2017 Eur. Phys. J. D 71 300Google Scholar

    [19]

    Niu Z X, Zhang X, Zhang W 2019 Eur. Phys. J. D 73 112Google Scholar

    [20]

    Adhikari S K, Lu H, Pu H 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 063607Google Scholar

    [21]

    Qi P T, Duan W S 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 033627Google Scholar

    [22]

    Milburn G J, Corney J, Wright E M, Walls D F 1997 Phys. Rev. A 55 4318Google Scholar

    [23]

    Xiong B, Gong J, Pu H, Bao W, Li B 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 013626Google Scholar

    [24]

    李振威 2008 量子光学学报 14 426Google Scholar

    Li Z W 2008 J. Quantum Opt. 14 426Google Scholar

    [25]

    Wang Y S, Long P, Zhang B, Zhang H 2017 Can. J. Phys. 95 622Google Scholar

    [26]

    Erdmann J, Mistakidis S I, Schmelcher P 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 053614Google Scholar

    [27]

    Caballero-Benítez S F, Ostrovskaya E A, Gulácsí M, Kivshar Y S 2009 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 42 215308Google Scholar

  • [1] 邱旭, 王林雪, 陈光平, 胡爱元, 文林. 自旋张量-动量耦合玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚的动力学性质.  , 2023, 72(18): 180304. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20231076
    [2] 张定, 朱玉莹, 汪恒, 薛其坤. 转角铜氧化物中的约瑟夫森效应.  , 2023, 72(23): 237402. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20231815
    [3] 马赟娥, 乔鑫, 高瑞, 梁俊成, 张爱霞, 薛具奎. 可调自旋-轨道耦合玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚体的隧穿动力学.  , 2022, 71(21): 210302. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220697
    [4] 袁都奇. 囚禁有限unitary费米气体的热力学性质.  , 2016, 65(18): 180302. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.180302
    [5] 张恒, 王文元, 蒙红娟, 马莹, 马云云, 段文山. 玻色-费米混合气体的非线性Landau-Zener隧穿.  , 2013, 62(11): 110305. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.110305
    [6] 邢耀亮, 杨志安. 半导体光折变介质中光束传输的自囚禁及周期调制.  , 2013, 62(13): 130302. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.130302
    [7] 黄芳, 李海彬. 双势阱中玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚的绝热隧穿.  , 2011, 60(2): 020303. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.020303
    [8] 李高清, 陈海军, 薛具奎. 一维双组分玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚体系的量子隧穿特性.  , 2010, 59(3): 1449-1455. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.1449
    [9] 张科智, 王建军, 刘国荣, 薛具奎. 两组分BECs在光晶格中的隧穿动力学及其周期调制效应.  , 2010, 59(5): 2952-2961. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.2952
    [10] 林恺, 杨树政. Vaidya-Bonner黑洞的费米子隧穿.  , 2009, 58(2): 744-748. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.744
    [11] 王冠芳, 刘 红. 扫描磁场中玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚体系的奇异自旋隧穿.  , 2008, 57(2): 667-673. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.667
    [12] 李菊萍, 谭 磊, 臧小飞, 杨 科. 偶极旋量玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚体在外场中的自旋混合动力学.  , 2008, 57(12): 7467-7476. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.7467
    [13] 尤育新, 赵志刚, 王 进, 刘 楣. 高温超导体中约瑟夫森涡旋流阻的振荡效应.  , 2008, 57(11): 7252-7256. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.7252
    [14] 陈 立, 毛邦宁, 王煜博, 王丽敏, 潘佰良. Sr离子自终止和复合激光交替振荡的动力学模型.  , 2007, 56(12): 6976-6981. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.6976
    [15] 肖宇飞, 王登龙, 王凤姣, 颜晓红. 非对称的玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚中的约瑟夫森结的动力学性质.  , 2006, 55(2): 547-550. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.547
    [16] 马 云, 傅立斌, 杨志安, 刘 杰. 玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚体自囚禁现象的动力学相变及其量子纠缠特性.  , 2006, 55(11): 5623-5628. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.5623
    [17] 王震宇, 廖红印, 周世平. 直流偏置的与RLC谐振器耦合的约瑟夫森结动力学行为的数值模拟.  , 2001, 50(10): 1996-2000. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.1996
    [18] 孟续军, 宗晓萍, 白 云, 孙永盛, 张景琳. 混合物质原子结构的自洽场计算.  , 2000, 49(11): 2133-2138. doi: 10.7498/aps.49.2133
    [19] 邹健, 邵彬, 邢修三. 双模非经典光场辐照下介观约瑟夫森结中超流的动力学行为.  , 1997, 46(11): 2233-2240. doi: 10.7498/aps.46.2233
    [20] 刘福绥. 超导桥约瑟夫森效应的微观理论.  , 1977, 26(5): 411-416. doi: 10.7498/aps.26.411
计量
  • 文章访问数:  4323
  • PDF下载量:  73
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-11-24
  • 修回日期:  2021-12-20
  • 上网日期:  2022-01-26
  • 刊出日期:  2022-05-05

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map