周期驱动系统的非平衡热输运与热力学几何

王子; 任捷

doi:10.7498/aps.70.20211723

摘要

随着对微纳尺度系统的深入理解和实验技术的进步, 发生在这些小系统中的热输运和能量转换近期吸引了大量研究. 不同于依赖静态热力学力(如温差、电势差等)的非平衡稳态调控手段, 受时间驱动的非平衡非稳态小系统具有特有的高可调性和普遍性, 其研究同时具有基础价值和应用潜力. 本文从几何这一基本概念出发, 分析了热力学几何相(曲率)和热力学距离这两个关键物理量, 以几何的视角展现和分析近期关于受驱动非平衡量子系统中输运调控和能量转换途径的热力学研究. 热力学几何不仅可以看作是这一大类系统中非平凡输运和耗散的本质起源, 也同样给我们提供了一种理论框架, 给出对于系统输运和能量转换的限制, 同时也可以给出慢驱动条件下量子热机性能的通用优化方式. 这将在未来帮助理解非平衡量子多体系统所发挥的能量输运/转换功能, 也会为发现高性能(高效率、高功率、高可靠性)量子热机提供新的设计思路.

关键词:

Abstract

With the in-depth understanding of nano-/micro-scaled systems and the developing of the corresponding experimental techniques, the heat transport and energy conversion processes in these small systems have attracted much interest recently. In contrast to the static manipulation methods, which hinge on the steady nonequilibrium sources such as temperature bias, chemical potential difference, etc., the temporal driving methods can control small systems in nonequilibrium non-steady states with much more versatility and universality. The research on periodically driven small systems holds both fundamental and pragmatic promises. This review is based on the fundamental concept of geometry. By analyzing the geometric phase and thermodynamic length in the transport process and the energy conversion process, we provide a unified perspective for the recent researches on the thermodynamic properties of driven nonequilibrium quantum systems. Thermodynamic geometry not only is the intrinsic origin of the nontrivial transport and dissipation, but also provides us with an all-applicable theoretical framework. The discussion over the geometry would yield multiple thermodynamic constraints on the transport and energy conversion, and can naturally construct a general optimization method as well. This will conduce to a better understanding of functionality for nonequilibrium quantum many-body systems acting as thermal machines. Also, this will inspire people to design quantum thermal machines with simultaneously more ideal performance, i.e. higher efficiency, higher power and higher constancy.

Keywords:

作者及机构信息

王子,
任捷

同济大学物理科学与工程学院, 声子学与热能科学中心, 上海市特殊人工微结构材料与技术重点实验室, 上海　200092

通信作者: 任捷, xonics@tongji.edu.cn

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 11935010, 11775159)资助的课题

Authors and contacts

Wang Zi,
Ren Jie

Shanghai Key Laboratory of Special Artificial Microstructure Materials and Technology, Center for Phononics and Thermal Energy Science, China-EU Joint Lab on Nanophononics, School of Physics Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Corresponding author: Ren Jie, xonics@tongji.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11935010, 11775159).

文章全文 : translate this paragraph

参考文献

[1]	Martínez I A, Roldán É, Dinis L, Petrov D, Parrondo J M, Rica R A 2016 Nat. Phys. 12 67 Google Scholar
[2]	Seifert U 2008 Eur. Phys. J. B 64 423 Google Scholar
[3]	Scully M O, Zubairy M S, Agarwal G S, Walther H 2003 Science 299 862 Google Scholar
[4]	Roßnagel J, Abah O, Schmidt-Kaler F, Singer K, Lutz E 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 30602 Google Scholar
[5]	Rahav S, Harbola U, Mukamel S 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 43843 Google Scholar
[6]	Goswami H P, Harbola U 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 13842 Google Scholar
[7]	王子, 张丹妹, 任捷 2019 68 220302 Google Scholar Wang Z, Zhang DM, Ren J 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 220302 Google Scholar
[8]	Esposito M, Lindenberg K, Van den Broeck C 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 130602 Google Scholar
[9]	Nakpathomkun N, Xu H Q, Linke H 2010 Phys. Rev. B 82 235428 Google Scholar
[10]	Tu Z C 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 020513 Google Scholar
[11]	Van den Broeck C 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 190602 Google Scholar
[12]	Abiuso P, Perarnau-Llobet M 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 110606 Google Scholar
[13]	Miller H J, Mohammady M H, Perarnau-Llobet M, Guarnieri G 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 210603 Google Scholar
[14]	Solon A P, Horowitz J M 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 180605 Google Scholar
[15]	Ren J, Hänggi P, Li B 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 170601 Google Scholar
[16]	Nie W, Li G, Li X, Chen A, Lan Y, Zhu S 2020 Phys. Rev. A 102 43512 Google Scholar
[17]	Ren J, Liu S, Li B 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 210603 Google Scholar
[18]	Wang C, Ren J, Cao J 2017 Phys. Rev. A 95 23610 Google Scholar
[19]	Giri S K, Goswami H P 2017 Phys. Rev. E 96 052129 Google Scholar
[20]	Hino Y, Hayakawa H 2021 Phys. Rev. Res. 3 13187 Google Scholar
[21]	Yuge T, Sagawa T, Sugita A, Hayakawa H 2013 J. Stat. Phys. 153 412 Google Scholar
[22]	Sagawa T, Hayakawa H 2011 Phys. Rev. E 84 51110 Google Scholar
[23]	Crooks G E 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 100602 Google Scholar
[24]	Sivak D A, Crooks G E 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 190602 Google Scholar
[25]	Brandner K, Saito K 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 40602 Google Scholar
[26]	Miller H J, Mehboudi M 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 260602 Google Scholar
[27]	Breuer H, Petruccione F 2002 The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (New York: Oxford University Press)
[28]	Kolodrubetz M, Sels D, Mehta P, Polkovnikov A 2017 Phys. Rep. 697 1 Google Scholar
[29]	Cavina V, Mari A, Giovannetti V 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 50601 Google Scholar
[30]	Sekimoto K 1997 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 66 1234 Google Scholar
[31]	Berry M V 1984 Proc. R. Soc. A 392 45 Google Scholar
[32]	Thouless D J 1983 Phys. Rev. B 27 6083 Google Scholar
[33]	Deffner S, Lutz E 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 140404 Google Scholar
[34]	Seifert U 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 40602 Google Scholar
[35]	Brouwer P W 1998 Phys. Rev. B 58 R10135 Google Scholar
[36]	Splettstoesser J, Governale M, König J, Fazio R 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 246803 Google Scholar
[37]	Sinitsyn N A, Nemenman I 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 220408 Google Scholar
[38]	Esposito M, Harbola U, Mukamel S 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 1665 Google Scholar
[39]	Chen T, Wang X, Ren J 2013 Phys. Rev. B 87 144303 Google Scholar
[40]	Xu D, Cao J 2016 Front. Phys. 11 110308 Google Scholar
[41]	Wang C, Ren J, Cao J 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 11787 Google Scholar
[42]	Wang Z, Wang L, Chen J, Wang C, Ren J 2022 Front. Phys. 17 13201 Google Scholar
[43]	Hino Y, Hayakawa H 2020 Phys. Rev. E 102 012115 Google Scholar
[44]	Guéry-Odelin D, Ruschhaupt A, Kiely A, Torrontegui E, Martínez-Garaot S, Muga J G 2019 Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 45001 Google Scholar
[45]	Takahashi K, Fujii K, Hino Y, Hayakawa H 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 150602 Google Scholar
[46]	Funo K, Lambert N, Nori F, Flindt C 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 150603 Google Scholar
[47]	Hatano T, Sasa S 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 3463 Google Scholar
[48]	Weinhold F 1975 J. Chem. Phys. 63 2479 Google Scholar
[49]	Ruppeiner G 1995 Rev. Mod. Phys. 67 605 Google Scholar
[50]	Feng E H, Crooks G E 2009 Phys. Rev. E 79 012104 Google Scholar
[51]	Sivak D A, Crooks G E 2016 Phys. Rev. E 94 052106 Google Scholar
[52]	Brandner K, Saito K, Seifert U 2015 Phys. Rev. X 5 031019 Google Scholar
[53]	Brandner K, Seifert U 2016 Phys. Rev. E 93 62134 Google Scholar
[54]	Bhandari B, Alonso P T, Taddei F, von Oppen F, Fazio R, Arrachea L 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 155407 Google Scholar
[55]	Potanina E, Flindt C, Moskalets M, Brandner K 2021 Phys. Rev. X 11 021013 Google Scholar
[56]	Tu Z 2021 Front. Phys. 16 33202 Google Scholar
[57]	Quan H, Liu Y, Sun C, Nori F 2007 Phys. Rev. E 76 031105 Google Scholar

施引文献

图 1 周期性驱动非平衡量子输运和其中几何性质的示意图　(a) 非平衡量子系统示意图. 量子系统由一个包含多个能级的系统来表示, 它可以与多个热库相连. 热库温度($ {T}_{\mathrm{h}} $和$ {T}_{\mathrm{c}} $)和系统参数$(\lambda)$都被含时地驱动. 由此, 可以产生系统与热库间的热量交换($ {Q}_{\mathrm{h}} $和$ {Q}_{\mathrm{c}} $)以及系统的功输出(W). (b) 此非平衡量子系统在参数空间($\boldsymbol{\varLambda }\equiv \left(T, \lambda \right) $)中的几何性质. 曲线坐标系表现出非均匀的热力学距离, 而各点的箭头表示几何联络. 几何联络在几何上对应平行移动一个微小参数时带来的和乐(holonomy)角. 热力学距离定义了一个具有度规的黎曼曲面

Fig. 1. A scheme of periodically driven nonequilibrium quantum transport and its geometry. (a) A diagrammatic nonequilibrium quantum system. The middle quantum system is illustrated by a multi-level system, which is coupled with several thermal reservoirs. The temperature of reservoirs ($ {T}_{\mathrm{h}} $ and $ {T}_{\mathrm{c}} $) and the mechanical parameter of the system ($ \lambda $) are simultaneously and periodically modulated. The heat exchange ($ {Q}_{\mathrm{h}} $ and $ {Q}_{\mathrm{c}} $) and work output $(W)$ are thus generated. (b) The geometry of this nonequilibrium quantum system in the space of parameters $(\boldsymbol{\varLambda }\equiv $$ \left(T, \lambda \right) )$. The curvilinear coordinate is adopted to show the inhomogeneous thermodynamic distance and the local vectors are for the geometric connection, as derived in the main text. Geometrically, the geometric connection is the holonomy angle during an infinitesimal parallel transport and the thermodynamic distance between neighboring points defines a Riemannian space with endowed metric.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 几何相热泵浦　(a) 最初研究的量子分子结系统, 工作介质由一个两能级系统描述, ${p}$和${k}$分别为各个占据数和跃迁速率^[15]; (b) 驱动两端温度产生的热泵浦现象, 图中用颜色表示了几何曲率的大小. 几何泵浦的热量为驱动回路包裹的范围内的几何曲率积分^[15]. (c), (d)自旋-玻色系统中几何相热流与系统-热库耦合强度$ \alpha $的关系^[18]. (c)为无Zeeman劈裂能的情形; (d)为有Zeeman劈裂能的情形^[18]. (a), (b)改编自文献[15]; (c), (d)改编自文献[18]

Fig. 2. The geometric heat pump effect. (a) The originally studied quantum molecular junction system. The working medium is described by a quantum two-level system, with ${p}$ and ${k}$ denoting different populations and transition rates^[15]. (b) The geometric curvature in the two-temperature parameter space. The color denotes the magnitude of the geometric curvature. The pumped heat is the integral of geometric curvature over the encircled area^[15]. (c), (d) The geometrically pumped heat versus the coupling strength between the middle system and reservoirs in a quantum spin-boson system^[18]. (c) is for the setup with no Zeeman splitting while the splitting is present in (d) ^[18]. (a), (b) are adapted from [15], while (c), (d) are adapted from [18].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 通过热力学距离对慢驱动热机的限制和优化　(a) 周期驱动量子热机中的功率与效率权衡. 灰色区域是根据热力学几何得出的不可能区域, 黑色线对应等速率驱动方式, 而橙色线对应经过优化的驱动方式(驱动速度随时间变化), 这两种驱动方式中驱动速度的具体形式由图(b)给出^[25]. (c), (d) 对于驱动量子热机(一个谐振子)的多目标优化^[26]　 (c)不同的优化后的驱动速度; (d) 功的相对涨落与谐振子频率的关系, 此时为效率-功涨落的多目标优化. 红线为匀速率的驱动, 而蓝线对应优化后的驱动, 灰色区域为由热力学几何给出的不可能区域^[26]. (a), (b)改编自文献[25]; (c), (d)改编自文献[26]

Fig. 3. The constraint on and optimization of slowly driven quantum heat engine using the thermodynamics distance method: (a) The efficiency-power tradeoff in driven quantum heat engine. The gray area is ruled out by the thermodynamic geometry, with the black and orange line corresponding to the constant-speed driving and optimized driving protocols (driving speed is time dependent) respectively. The driving speed in these two protocols is illustrated in Figure (b)^[25]. (c), (d) A multiple target optimization of a driven heat engine composed of a harmonic oscillator: (c) the driving speed of the optimization result with different targets^[26]; (d) the relative work fluctuation versus the oscillator’s frequency (system’s parameter) with a multiple target optimization. The red line is for the constant speed driving while the blue one is for the optimized protocol. The gray area is prohibited by the thermodynamic geometry^[26]. (a), (b) are adapted from Ref. [25], while (c), (d) are adapted from Ref. [26].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

map

[1]	Martínez I A, Roldán É, Dinis L, Petrov D, Parrondo J M, Rica R A 2016 Nat. Phys. 12 67 Google Scholar
[2]	Seifert U 2008 Eur. Phys. J. B 64 423 Google Scholar
[3]	Scully M O, Zubairy M S, Agarwal G S, Walther H 2003 Science 299 862 Google Scholar
[4]	Roßnagel J, Abah O, Schmidt-Kaler F, Singer K, Lutz E 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 30602 Google Scholar
[5]	Rahav S, Harbola U, Mukamel S 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 43843 Google Scholar
[6]	Goswami H P, Harbola U 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 13842 Google Scholar
[7]	王子, 张丹妹, 任捷 2019 68 220302 Google Scholar Wang Z, Zhang DM, Ren J 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 220302 Google Scholar
[8]	Esposito M, Lindenberg K, Van den Broeck C 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 130602 Google Scholar
[9]	Nakpathomkun N, Xu H Q, Linke H 2010 Phys. Rev. B 82 235428 Google Scholar
[10]	Tu Z C 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 020513 Google Scholar
[11]	Van den Broeck C 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 190602 Google Scholar
[12]	Abiuso P, Perarnau-Llobet M 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 110606 Google Scholar
[13]	Miller H J, Mohammady M H, Perarnau-Llobet M, Guarnieri G 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 210603 Google Scholar
[14]	Solon A P, Horowitz J M 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 180605 Google Scholar
[15]	Ren J, Hänggi P, Li B 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 170601 Google Scholar
[16]	Nie W, Li G, Li X, Chen A, Lan Y, Zhu S 2020 Phys. Rev. A 102 43512 Google Scholar
[17]	Ren J, Liu S, Li B 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 210603 Google Scholar
[18]	Wang C, Ren J, Cao J 2017 Phys. Rev. A 95 23610 Google Scholar
[19]	Giri S K, Goswami H P 2017 Phys. Rev. E 96 052129 Google Scholar
[20]	Hino Y, Hayakawa H 2021 Phys. Rev. Res. 3 13187 Google Scholar
[21]	Yuge T, Sagawa T, Sugita A, Hayakawa H 2013 J. Stat. Phys. 153 412 Google Scholar
[22]	Sagawa T, Hayakawa H 2011 Phys. Rev. E 84 51110 Google Scholar
[23]	Crooks G E 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 100602 Google Scholar
[24]	Sivak D A, Crooks G E 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 190602 Google Scholar
[25]	Brandner K, Saito K 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 40602 Google Scholar
[26]	Miller H J, Mehboudi M 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 260602 Google Scholar
[27]	Breuer H, Petruccione F 2002 The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (New York: Oxford University Press)
[28]	Kolodrubetz M, Sels D, Mehta P, Polkovnikov A 2017 Phys. Rep. 697 1 Google Scholar
[29]	Cavina V, Mari A, Giovannetti V 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 50601 Google Scholar
[30]	Sekimoto K 1997 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 66 1234 Google Scholar
[31]	Berry M V 1984 Proc. R. Soc. A 392 45 Google Scholar
[32]	Thouless D J 1983 Phys. Rev. B 27 6083 Google Scholar
[33]	Deffner S, Lutz E 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 140404 Google Scholar
[34]	Seifert U 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 40602 Google Scholar
[35]	Brouwer P W 1998 Phys. Rev. B 58 R10135 Google Scholar
[36]	Splettstoesser J, Governale M, König J, Fazio R 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 246803 Google Scholar
[37]	Sinitsyn N A, Nemenman I 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 220408 Google Scholar
[38]	Esposito M, Harbola U, Mukamel S 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 1665 Google Scholar
[39]	Chen T, Wang X, Ren J 2013 Phys. Rev. B 87 144303 Google Scholar
[40]	Xu D, Cao J 2016 Front. Phys. 11 110308 Google Scholar
[41]	Wang C, Ren J, Cao J 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 11787 Google Scholar
[42]	Wang Z, Wang L, Chen J, Wang C, Ren J 2022 Front. Phys. 17 13201 Google Scholar
[43]	Hino Y, Hayakawa H 2020 Phys. Rev. E 102 012115 Google Scholar
[44]	Guéry-Odelin D, Ruschhaupt A, Kiely A, Torrontegui E, Martínez-Garaot S, Muga J G 2019 Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 45001 Google Scholar
[45]	Takahashi K, Fujii K, Hino Y, Hayakawa H 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 150602 Google Scholar
[46]	Funo K, Lambert N, Nori F, Flindt C 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 150603 Google Scholar
[47]	Hatano T, Sasa S 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 3463 Google Scholar
[48]	Weinhold F 1975 J. Chem. Phys. 63 2479 Google Scholar
[49]	Ruppeiner G 1995 Rev. Mod. Phys. 67 605 Google Scholar
[50]	Feng E H, Crooks G E 2009 Phys. Rev. E 79 012104 Google Scholar
[51]	Sivak D A, Crooks G E 2016 Phys. Rev. E 94 052106 Google Scholar
[52]	Brandner K, Saito K, Seifert U 2015 Phys. Rev. X 5 031019 Google Scholar
[53]	Brandner K, Seifert U 2016 Phys. Rev. E 93 62134 Google Scholar
[54]	Bhandari B, Alonso P T, Taddei F, von Oppen F, Fazio R, Arrachea L 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 155407 Google Scholar
[55]	Potanina E, Flindt C, Moskalets M, Brandner K 2021 Phys. Rev. X 11 021013 Google Scholar
[56]	Tu Z 2021 Front. Phys. 16 33202 Google Scholar
[57]	Quan H, Liu Y, Sun C, Nori F 2007 Phys. Rev. E 76 031105 Google Scholar

[1]	胡敏丽, 房凡, 樊群超, 范志祥, 李会东, 付佳, 谢锋. NO⁺离子系统热力学性质的理论研究. , 2023, 72(16): 165101. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230541
[2]	翟荟. 基于冷原子的非平衡量子多体物理研究. , 2023, 72(23): 230701. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20231375
[3]	蔡子. 非平衡量子物态中的对称性与时间维度效应. , 2021, 70(23): 230310. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211741
[4]	. 非平衡量子多体系统专题编者按. , 2021, 70(23): 230101. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.230101
[5]	沈珏, 刘成周, 朱宁宁, 童一诺, 严晨成, 薛珂磊. 非对易施瓦西黑洞的热力学及其量子修正. , 2019, 68(20): 200401. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20191054
[6]	王子, 张丹妹, 任捷. 声子系统中弹性波与热输运的拓扑与非互易现象. , 2019, 68(22): 220302. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20191463
[7]	赵丽梅, 张国锋. 带有Dzyaloshinski-Mariya相互作用的两比特纠缠量子Otto热机和量子Stirling热机. , 2017, 66(24): 240502. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.240502
[8]	王涛, 黄晓理, 刘洋, 许欢. 带有Dzyaloshinski-Mariya相互作用的两比特XXZ模型的纠缠量子热机. , 2013, 62(6): 060301. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.060301
[9]	王建辉, 熊双泉, 何济洲, 刘江涛. 以一维谐振子势阱中的单粒子为工质的量子热机性能分析. , 2012, 61(8): 080509. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.080509
[10]	沈惠川. 分析热力学的应用：平衡态热力学中温度的相对论变换. , 2005, 54(6): 2482-2488. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.2482
[11]	王钢柱, 王纪龙. 缓变动态Kerr-Newman黑洞的量子热力学性质. , 2004, 53(6): 1669-1674. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.1669
[12]	高涛, 王红艳, 易有根, 谭明亮, 朱正和, 孙颖, 汪小琳, 傅依备. PuO分子X5Σ-态的势能函数及热力学函数的量子力学计算. , 1999, 48(12): 2222-2227. doi: 10.7498/aps.48.2222
[13]	李伯臧, 张德刚, 吴建华, 阎凤利. 循环量子系统中状态演化的Bloch定理和同步几何相位的统一. , 1997, 46(2): 227-237. doi: 10.7498/aps.46.227
[14]	张文忠, 王顺金. SU(3)线性非自治量子系统的代数动力学求解. , 1997, 46(2): 209-226. doi: 10.7498/aps.46.209
[15]	左维, 王顺金. 量子辐射场与经典流的相互作用 hω(4)线性非自治量子系统的代数动力学求解. , 1995, 44(9): 1363-1372. doi: 10.7498/aps.44.1363
[16]	左维, 王顺金. 代数动力学与SU(2)线性非自治量子系统. , 1995, 44(8): 1177-1183. doi: 10.7498/aps.44.1177
[17]	左维, 王顺金, A.Weiguny, 李福利. SU(1,1)线性非自治量子系统的代数动力学求解. , 1995, 44(8): 1184-1191. doi: 10.7498/aps.44.1184
[18]	欧发. 耗散系统的准热力学模型. , 1995, 44(10): 1541-1550. doi: 10.7498/aps.44.1541
[19]	熊元生, 易林, 姚凯伦. 量子Sherrington-Kirkpatrick自旋玻璃模型的热力学性质——各向异性和磁场影响. , 1994, 43(12): 2052-2058. doi: 10.7498/aps.43.2052
[20]	杜宜瑾, 陈立溁, 严祖同. 二维系统的热力学性质. , 1982, 31(7): 939-944. doi: 10.7498/aps.31.939

计量

文章访问数: 5838
PDF下载量: 300
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

搜索

留言板

周期驱动系统的非平衡热输运与热力学几何