两格点两电子Hubbard-Holstein模型极化子的量子纠缠特性

任学藻; 贺树; 丛红璐; 王旭文

doi:10.7498/aps.61.124207

摘要

本文利用相干态正交化展开方法, 对两格点两电子Hubbard-Holstein极化子模型的能谱以及动力学特性进行了精确求解. 讨论了耦合强度g、平均声子数n以及电子初态对纠缠演化特性及系统冯诺依曼熵的影响. 数值计算结果表明: 1)纠缠度随时间的演化呈现出良好的周期性, 当其他的参数固定时, 演化周期随耦合强度g增大逐渐减小, 与平均声子数n无关; 2)系统冯诺依曼熵同电子状态占有率表现出严格的同步演化特性; (3) 在弱耦合强度和低平均声子数下, 初始电子态c2+ c2+|Oe或c1+ c1+ |Oe较c1+c2+c1+ c2+具有更大的最大冯诺依曼熵, 并随耦合强度增大、平均声子数的增加而逐渐接近.

关键词:

Abstract

We obtain the exact solution of energy spectrum and dynamics for the two-site Hubbard-Holstein model by the coherent states orthogonal expansion method. The influences of coupling strength g, the average number of phonons n and the initial electronic state on the evolution of system entanglement and von Neumann entropy are discussed. Numerical results are as follows. (a) Entanglement evolution with time shows a good periodicity. When the other parameters are fixed, the evolution period decreases as the coupling strength g goes up but it is independent of the average number of phonons n. (b) The von Neumann entropy of the system demonstrates strict synchronia with the electronic state occupancy probability. (c) Under the weak coupling strength and low average number of phonons, the initial electronic state c2+ c2+|Oe or c1+ c1+|Oe shows larger maximum von Neumann entropy during its evolution than that of c1+c2+c1+c2++ but they gradually approach to each other with the increase of coupling strength or average number of phonons.

Keywords:

作者及机构信息

1.
西南科技大学理学院, 四川,绵阳 621010;

2.
北京交通大学海滨学院, 河北,黄骅 061100

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金委员会-中国工程物理研究院联合基金(批准号: 10976025/A06)资助的课题.

Authors and contacts

1.
School of Science, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China-NASF (Grant No. 1097602/A06).

参考文献

[1]	Fehske H,Wellein G, Loos J, Bishop A R 2008 Phys. Rev. B 77 085117
[2]	Holstein T 1959 Ann. Phys. 8 325
[3]	Das A N P, Choudhury S 1994 Phys. Rev. B 49 18
[4]	Acquaroneet M 1998 Phys. Rev. B 58 7626
[5]	Chatterjee J, Das A N, arXiv:cond-mat/0210607
[6]	Ranninger J, Thibblin U 1992 Phys. Rev. B 45 7730
[7]	deMello E V L, Ranninger J 1997 Phys. Rev. B 55 14872
[8]	Berciu M 2007 Phys. Rev. B 75 081101
[9]	Bennett C H, Wiesner S J 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 2881
[10]	Bouwmeaster D, Pan J W, Mattle K, Elbl M, Weinfurter H, Zeilinger A 1997 Nature 390 575
[11]	Bennett C H, Brassard G, Jozsa R, Crépeau C, Jozsa R, Peres A, Wootters W K 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 1895
[12]	Deutsch D, Ekert A, Jozsa R, Macchiavello C, Popescu S, Sanpera A 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 2818
[13]	Shor P W 1995 Phys. Rev. A 52 2493
[14]	Bardeen J, Cooper L N, Schrieffer J R 1957 Phys. Rev. 108 1175
[15]	Phoenix S J D, Knight P L 1991 Phys. Rev. A 44 6023
[16]	Obada A S F, Hessian H A, Abdel A M 2005 International Journal of Quantum Information 3 591
[17]	Faisal A, El-Orany A, Wahiddin M R B, Obada A S F 2008 Optics Communications 281 2854
[18]	Hu Y H, Fang M F, Liao X P 2006 Acta Optic Sinica 55 4631
[19]	Zhang Y Y, Liu T, Chen Q H, Wang X G, Wang K L 2009 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21 415601
[20]	Zhang Y Y, Wang X G, Chen Q H 2009 Solid State Communications 149 2106
[21]	Chaterjee J, Das A N 2000 Phys. Rev. B 61 4592
[22]	Ren X Z, Jiang D L, Cong H L, Liao X 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 5406 (in Chinese) [任学藻, 姜道来, 丛红璐, 廖旭 2009 58 5406]
[23]	Irish E K, Gea-Banacloche J, Martin I, Schwab K C 2006 Phys. Rev. B 72 195410
[24]	Zhao Y, Zanardi P, Chen G H 2004 Phys. Rev. B 70 195113
[25]	Yao K L, Li Y C, un X Z, Liu Q M, Qin Y, Fu H H, Gao G Y 2005 Phys. Lett. A 346 209
[26]	Vladimir M, Stojanovic, Mihajlo Vanevic 2008 Phys. Rev. B 78 214301
[27]	Phoenix S J D, Knight P L 1988 Annals of Physics 182 381

施引文献

[1]	Fehske H,Wellein G, Loos J, Bishop A R 2008 Phys. Rev. B 77 085117
[2]	Holstein T 1959 Ann. Phys. 8 325
[3]	Das A N P, Choudhury S 1994 Phys. Rev. B 49 18
[4]	Acquaroneet M 1998 Phys. Rev. B 58 7626
[5]	Chatterjee J, Das A N, arXiv:cond-mat/0210607
[6]	Ranninger J, Thibblin U 1992 Phys. Rev. B 45 7730
[7]	deMello E V L, Ranninger J 1997 Phys. Rev. B 55 14872
[8]	Berciu M 2007 Phys. Rev. B 75 081101
[9]	Bennett C H, Wiesner S J 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 2881
[10]	Bouwmeaster D, Pan J W, Mattle K, Elbl M, Weinfurter H, Zeilinger A 1997 Nature 390 575
[11]	Bennett C H, Brassard G, Jozsa R, Crépeau C, Jozsa R, Peres A, Wootters W K 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 1895
[12]	Deutsch D, Ekert A, Jozsa R, Macchiavello C, Popescu S, Sanpera A 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 2818
[13]	Shor P W 1995 Phys. Rev. A 52 2493
[14]	Bardeen J, Cooper L N, Schrieffer J R 1957 Phys. Rev. 108 1175
[15]	Phoenix S J D, Knight P L 1991 Phys. Rev. A 44 6023
[16]	Obada A S F, Hessian H A, Abdel A M 2005 International Journal of Quantum Information 3 591
[17]	Faisal A, El-Orany A, Wahiddin M R B, Obada A S F 2008 Optics Communications 281 2854
[18]	Hu Y H, Fang M F, Liao X P 2006 Acta Optic Sinica 55 4631
[19]	Zhang Y Y, Liu T, Chen Q H, Wang X G, Wang K L 2009 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21 415601
[20]	Zhang Y Y, Wang X G, Chen Q H 2009 Solid State Communications 149 2106
[21]	Chaterjee J, Das A N 2000 Phys. Rev. B 61 4592
[22]	Ren X Z, Jiang D L, Cong H L, Liao X 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 5406 (in Chinese) [任学藻, 姜道来, 丛红璐, 廖旭 2009 58 5406]
[23]	Irish E K, Gea-Banacloche J, Martin I, Schwab K C 2006 Phys. Rev. B 72 195410
[24]	Zhao Y, Zanardi P, Chen G H 2004 Phys. Rev. B 70 195113
[25]	Yao K L, Li Y C, un X Z, Liu Q M, Qin Y, Fu H H, Gao G Y 2005 Phys. Lett. A 346 209
[26]	Vladimir M, Stojanovic, Mihajlo Vanevic 2008 Phys. Rev. B 78 214301
[27]	Phoenix S J D, Knight P L 1988 Annals of Physics 182 381

[1]	刘俊娟, 魏增江, 常虹, 张亚琳, 邸冰. 杂质离子对有机共轭聚合物中极化子动力学性质的影响. , 2016, 65(6): 067202. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.067202
[2]	赵翠兰, 王丽丽, 赵丽丽. 有限深抛物势量子盘中极化子的激发态性质. , 2015, 64(18): 186301. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.186301
[3]	武振华, 李华, 严亮星, 刘炳灿, 田强. 分数维方法研究GaAs薄膜中的极化子. , 2013, 62(9): 097302. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.097302
[4]	赵翠兰, 丛银川. 球壳量子点中极化子和量子比特的声子效应. , 2012, 61(18): 186301. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.186301
[5]	王启文, 红兰. 二维量子点中极化子的自旋弛豫. , 2012, 61(1): 017107. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.017107
[6]	宋瑞, 刘晓静, 王亚东, 邸冰, 安忠. 电子-晶格耦合非线性项对极化子性质的影响. , 2010, 59(5): 3461-3465. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.3461
[7]	赵翠兰, 高宽云. 声子和磁场对量子环中极化子性质的影响. , 2010, 59(7): 4857-4862. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.4857
[8]	廖旭, 丛红璐, 姜道来, 任学藻. 非旋波近似下频率变化的光场对原子布居反转的调控. , 2010, 59(8): 5508-5513. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.5508
[9]	丛红璐, 任学藻, 姜道来, 廖旭. 精确求解级联型三能级原子与单模相干态光场场熵的演化特性. , 2010, 59(5): 3221-3226. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.3221
[10]	孙震, 安忠, 李元, 刘文, 刘德胜, 解士杰. 高聚物中极化子和三重态激子的碰撞过程研究. , 2009, 58(6): 4150-4155. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.4150
[11]	任学藻, 黄书文, 廖旭, 汪克林. 有限格点一维Holstein极化子研究. , 2009, 58(4): 2680-2683. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.2680
[12]	成秋丽, 谢双媛, 羊亚平. 频率变化的光场对双光子过程中量子纠缠的调控. , 2008, 57(11): 6968-6975. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.6968
[13]	赵凤岐, 周炳卿. 外电场作用下纤锌矿氮化物抛物量子阱中极化子能级. , 2007, 56(8): 4856-4863. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.4856
[14]	张耘. 极化子荧光及其断层扫描对Ti:LiNbO3光波导表征研究. , 2007, 56(1): 280-284. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.280
[15]	任学藻, 廖旭, 刘涛, 汪克林. 电子与双声子相互作用对Holstein极化子的影响. , 2006, 55(6): 2865-2870. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.2865
[16]	周青春, 祝世宁. 与准Λ型四能级系统互作用光场的熵演化. , 2005, 54(3): 1184-1189. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.1184
[17]	沈韩, 许华, 陈敏, 李景德. 钇掺杂钨酸铅晶体中的极化子和导纳谱. , 2003, 52(12): 3125-3129. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.3125
[18]	王鹿霞, 张大成, 刘德胜, 韩圣浩, 解士杰. 基态非简并聚合物中的极化子和双极化子动力学. , 2003, 52(10): 2547-2552. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.2547
[19]	敖胜美, 周石伦, 曾高坚. 非简并拉曼过程中交流斯塔克位移对场熵和缠绕的影响. , 2001, 50(1): 52-58. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.52
[20]	魏建华, 解士杰, 梅良模. 混合卤化物中的极化子与双极化子. , 2000, 49(11): 2264-2270. doi: 10.7498/aps.49.2264

计量

文章访问数: 7788
PDF下载量: 609
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

搜索

留言板